Alan Zweibel

Because it was in reference to how Kilmeade's comment echoed nazism. How you raised the issues of good Germans, bad communist and abortion supporters is irrelevant to his comment.

Maybe before you question the relevance of my comments, you should read what this topic is: FOX HOST SUGGESTS LEGAL INJECTION FOR HOMELESS PEOPLE In other words, it's valid to discuss his comment. But not Communist, good Germans, or people who support abortion rights.

That's a big reason he's lost so much support among Hispanic voters. They came away with the impression that he was going to go after criminals only. They didn't pay close attention to what he was really saying.

If I got off on schadenfreude, I would say that these farmers who voted for Trump are getting what they deserve. But I won't. Because they don't. But what it does show is that the claim that people knew what they were getting when they voted for Trump is at least partially true. Trump was very clear about where he stood on immigration. Lots of voters apparently didn't believe that he really meant it. Of course, in other ways he misled voters too, He tried to give the impression that he rejected project 2025 because support for it played very badly among voters. In fact, apart from the abortion program of project 2025, he was and is an enthusiastic supporter of it.

Typical callous Maga fanatic.

So when you repeatedly don't get the point, that means someone is being dishonest. I guess I'm going to have to spell it out for you. In response to my comment likening Kilmeade's comment to Nazi policy, Slowhand said "Everything isn't about jews." And as I pointed out to him my comment wasn't about the Jews. I subsequently explaned why it wasn't about the jews. And now twice you come in with irrelevant comments; the first time comparing communists to nazis and the second time about Germans who saved jews. What has that got to do with point that Nazis murdered people they considered to be mentally defective? Which is what Kilmeade was calling for.

One day you're going to surprise everyone with a relevant comment.

This year, through August, China’s trade surplus widened to $785.8 billion from $612.6 billion a year ago. Its surplus with countries across Southeast Asia, Africa, Latin America and Europe has climbed rapidly. China’s electric vehicle brands are storming new markets in Europe and Southeast Asia, while sales of heavily discounted Chinese solar panels are booming in Africa. https://archive.ph/4K8GN#selection-799.0-811.133 I bet the Chinese are just waiting until the something hits the fan as the US economy's keeps on weakening. At which point, they'll be approached by the US begging for a deal.

Even if you knew as much as anyone on this subject (which is about as delusional and self-aggrandizing a comment as can be found in asean.now) you would know that the Nazis also killed those with mental and physical defects. Instead you made it about the Jews.

A provision tucked into a government spending bill could shield Bayer and other pesticides makers from billions of dollars in payouts to plaintiffs... The proposal follows intense lobbying by Bayer and other industry interests over the past year. But it has sparked outrage from a new force in Washington: followers of the “Make America Healthy Again” movement. https://archive.ph/7rzY1#selection-685.0-685.210 Protect children or Big Chemical. Not a tough choice for Republican politicians.

Irrelevant to the point raised by slowhand.

You're right. Everything isn't about Jews. That includes my comment. The Nazis didn't just murder people based on ethnicity or race. Go educate yourself about it.

You're right, Everything isn't about Jews. My comment among them. The Nazis didn't just murder people on the basis of their race or ethnicity. Go educate yourself about it.

That was certainly true in Nazi Germany. Feeling nostalgic much?

More Americans are facing stretches of unemployment of six months or more, a worrisome sign for the U.S. economy. More than 1 in 4 workers without jobs have been unemployed for at least half a year, new data shows. That number is a post-pandemic high and a level typically only seen during periods of economic turmoil. https://archive.ph/tc09M#selection-435.0-449.103 Winning!

Already did.

I gotta give him credit. He lies in the face of facts just like Trump.

Pathetic.

You obviously don't know it but on your page, there's a link shows all a member's post's going back 2 years. Here's a link to your first posts. https://aseannow.com/profile/379909-harrisfan/content/page/419/?all_activity=1

Now I got you. Your earliest post on aseannow.com is dated Feb 6, 2025. Care to share with us any more falsehoods?

And of course anybody who's not a fool would believe an anonymous highly partisan source reporting on their post predictions.

So, you think he legitimately won the election and Trump and the rest of the MAGA universe (except you) were full of it?

And what does "ahead by a margin" even mean? If someone comes out ahead of course there's going to be a margin.

In your view are those the only ones that should count? What's your point? And how did you predict the 2020 election? Oh I forgot. You're going to claim it was stolen. That Trump really won. So I suppose in your mind that means you're batting 100%.

First you say he got it wrong. Now you're saying he said 50/50 Nate Silver: Here’s What My Gut Says About the Election, but Don’t Trust Anyone’s Gut, Even Mine In an election where the seven battleground states are all polling within a percentage point or two, 50-50 is the only responsible forecast. Since the debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, that is more or less exactly where my model has had it. Yet when I deliver this unsatisfying news, I inevitably get a question: “C’mon, Nate, what’s your gut say?” So OK, I’ll tell you. My gut says Donald Trump. And my guess is that it is true for many anxious Democrats. https://archive.ph/bEslW#selection-653.0-665.107