tgw

1 hour ago, treetops said:

Still there.  Last post was in February this year.

 

https://web.facebook.com/PattayaWatchdog/

 

so it's dead, Jim ?

75k followers and just like that ...

On 6/12/2024 at 1:59 PM, Hummin said:

Simple questions

 

Which country has the most feminine girls? And what is a feminine girl to you?

 

Travelling the world, dating Normal women, not women from P4P scene, I had a few experiences and good memories of those who invited me home for dinner and company, and the most seducctive women I met was from Sweeden. Feminine and dangerously tempting, playful and seductive hands down the most sexy girls in the world to a Norwegian. 

 

 Which country have the most feminine girls? And why

depends on what one considers feminine.

by my own criteria, I would say yes, the average Thai woman is more feminine than the average Western woman. I guess it's even more true for men 555

I had been following the Pattaya Watchdog group online, but got no news for a few months, approximatively since that Lion Cub was spotted in Pattaya, tried to find their FB group, but it seems empty, or was it deleted ?

Confirmed :

Tried to pay at 7-11, didn't work.

Tried to pay at Krungthai and they informed me about an error in Barcode and QR code.

Messaged their LINE account "taxincomepattaya" now, let's see if I get a reply.

I guess I'll need to get a yellow book.

8 hours ago, BobBKK said:

I also have family in Kiev, and I worked in Russia for a UK NGO. There is no difference between Slavs, and they will come back together again one day. Ukraine blatantly destroyed the Minsk agreement, and as has been told countless times, they did it to buy themselves time for this American proxy war after the elected government was overthrown. There are no elections in Ukraine and the opposition have been locked up in jails. You wear your bias like a badge of honour - shame on you.

what you are smoking has not been invented yet

I got a case where a client wants to accept donations from thankful people who got help on his website.

My client has a bitcoin wallet.

The donators don't all have a crypto wallet.

So I'm looking for an easy solution akin to "buy me a coffee" where donators click on a "donate" button, choose the amount, and are then taken to a payment form where they have the option to choose crypto, credit card, bank transfer... and/or other forms of payment, and once the payment has been made, the funds are deposited in crypto in my client's wallet.

My client doesn't want to know the donators' names, and my client doesn't want the donators to know his name.

Is there any platform that provides this kind of service ?

27 minutes ago, MichaelJackson said:

I made a small change in the WordPress Settings in which I changed the URL of the Wordpress site by accident. Now I am trying to get it back.

this should be an easy fix, unless that's not the only issue.

6 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:

Pointless asking here, ask experts in that field 

expert here.

8 minutes ago, Crossy said:

 

Rule #2: Make sure that your backup will actually restore!

 

There's only one thing worse than having no backup, and that's having a backup that won't restore (ask me how I know)

 

Rule #3: don't make the backup restore test on the running site !  use another virtual host or a local environment !

17 minutes ago, simon43 said:

You have trouble reverting it?  Did you make a copy of the original website before you messed it up?

sounds like no backup was made ...

seriously, don't do work for clients if you don't take precautions.

there is a civil liability !!

lucky if the client doesn't sue.

please, make full backups and use a local environment for any change/development of a client's live site.

I'm a professional website developer, contact me if needed.

1 hour ago, rabas said:

The leaked cable is indeed very interesting. Mostly a detailed summary of Russian views from various sources. But again note there is no mention (that I could see) of any Western promise to not expanding NATO. You would think the Russians would have at least mentioned it if there were.

there were no such promises.

"not one inch to the East" referred to the reunification of Germany, where NATO promised to not shift troops to Eastern Germany.

another thing to consider is that the cable isn't a recap of the situation, it's a report about what Lavrov said.

I was in Ukraine before the Orange Revolution. Lots of things (loads and loads of criminal acts by Russia) had already happened by then. Ukraine's bid for NATO membership at the time was a move to get protection from Russia.

1 minute ago, jvs said:

For any one who is willing to spend some time watching this video,there are some truths

on here for both sides!

I find it very hard to find anything here i can not agree with.

Thank you to the person who attended me to this channel.

 

their content is good, but I don't like the all-talk, there are no pictures, no videos, no maps, no nothing besides the talk and I don't find the voice particularly nice to listen to.

30 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

From the link

 

He wrote on X that it was “not the right time, not the right time at all. So many people die every day because we don’t have enough weapons and enough support from our allies.”

 

Perhaps they should have thought about that before they rejected negotiations. Always a losing prospect depending on countries that may have domestic issues affecting public/ government support.

Given that no western country has a treaty with Ukraine, none are obligated to help.

maybe you could explain about the negotiations, what deal was offered by Ruzzia ?

58 minutes ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

This coming out of Carnegie is probably a little heads up that we are at the limit of what the US will authorise and alarm at what a desperte Ukraine may do. It's an inner Beltway think tank and has the ear of the President and his advisers and maybe even channels his voice.

 

https://carnegieendowment.org/posts/2024/06/ukraine-prohibition-us-weapons-strike-russia?lang=en

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnegie_Endowment_for_International_Peace

 

The unfortunate reality is that there is a divergence between U.S. and Ukrainian interests. Kyiv has demonstrated that, in fighting off Russian aggression, it is willing to raise the risk of Russian nuclear use. Fair enough. Americans have their own interests, including seeing Ukraine successfully preserve its freedom and independence, but without risking a nuclear war in the process. It is not enough for American officials to express concern to Kyiv about the recent strikes. The United States should decline to further loosen its restrictions on the use of U.S.-supplied weapons. To relax the rules would risk American weapons being used against highly sensitive targets in Russia—including nuclear installations or leadership facilities, as well as early warning radars—thus potentially dragging the United States into in a high-stakes crisis against a nuclear-armed adversary.

the Carnegie writer is not in the loop it seems.

I see Ukraine's strikes on the Radar as a very clever part of ... I don't know what to call it, maybe you can find a name for what they are based on my explanation.

Here it goes :

- US going to authorize strikes with US weapons on Ruzzia

- Ruzzia hates the US

- Ukraine strikes Ruzzian radars with Ukrainian made weapons. The first radar was a useful military target, the second one.. doubtful. BUT ... it enraged the Ruzzians even more.

Effect : suddenly the US dissuading Ukraine from striking strategic Ruzzian early warning radars becomes a bargaining chip

which makes authorizing using US weapons to strike Ruzzian military targets within a narrow band around Ukraine seem like a lesser evil for Ruzzia, and at the same time clarifies the necessity for the West to better support Ukraine's defence efforts.

well played, Budanov !

5 minutes ago, retarius said:

Dangerous stupid thinking. The Chamberlain example is way overworked and is not the root of this conflict as you well know.

Nonsense post with zero content other than calling me stupid.

Why do so many anti-West and pro-Putin posts use expressions such as "as you well know" "my friends" etc ?

We are not friends with you and people like you, and no, we don't know what you (and your friends) all know so well. You will have to explain what you know so well but we don't.

the original story is clearer:

https://thethaiger.com/hot-news/crime/husband-of-ex-actress-charged-for-93-million-baht-porn-site

I guess the rephrasing is meant to avoid double content penalties.

1 hour ago, Misty said:

Nothing to do with reading comprehension. OP was ambiguous.

not at all.