MSingh Posted January 13, 2009 Share Posted January 13, 2009 (edited) These are some interesting Stats.. Great to see the Hammers with the most successful passes, outside of the Top 4 of course... http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11994_2705370,00.html Edited : Man City = They have the same amount of Shots on Target as the League Leaders, are more accurate with them than the League Leaders, but lie close to the relegation Zone ???????? Defending is so obviously the problem there then surely ?? Edited January 13, 2009 by MSingh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redrus Posted January 13, 2009 Share Posted January 13, 2009 lol Some fantasy team sheets maybe changing this weekend.... redrus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macclad Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 Stats make grim reading for Stoke fans with only 56 shots on target all season and the least number of successful passes but to be fair to them they are battling hard and might yet survive come the end of the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkkjames Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 Stats make grim reading for Stoke fans with only 56 shots on target all season and the least number of successful passes but to be fair to them they are battling hard and might yet survive come the end of the season. do throw-ins count as a shot on goal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
technocracy Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 I am absolutely positive our attacking stats will be changing for us in the 2nd half of the season! Come this weekend we'll have played the 'Top 4' home and away (excluding Arse away) - 11 of our 21 points so far have from playing teams in the top half of the table. As for tacklers I am pretty amazed there isn't a single Stoke player in the Top 5! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkkjames Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 I am absolutely positive our attacking stats will be changing for us in the 2nd half of the season!Come this weekend we'll have played the 'Top 4' home and away (excluding Arse away) - 11 of our 21 points so far have from playing teams in the top half of the table. As for tacklers I am pretty amazed there isn't a single Stoke player in the Top 5! it's ok, mr all-world tackler machoramo is not in the top five either. but these stats are bit misleading, when you have most of the ball, you don't need to tackle as often. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevieH Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 you can prove anything with stats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbojangles Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 Edited : Man City = They have the same amount of Shots on Target as the League Leaders, are more accurate with them than the League Leaders, but lie close to the relegation Zone ???????? Defending is so obviously the problem there then surely ?? Nail on the head Singh Hopefully we will address this very shortly. (insert fingers crossed smily) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkkjames Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 Edited : Man City = They have the same amount of Shots on Target as the League Leaders, are more accurate with them than the League Leaders, but lie close to the relegation Zone ???????? Defending is so obviously the problem there then surely ?? Nail on the head Singh Hopefully we will address this very shortly. (insert fingers crossed smily) I agree, signing kaka will help with your goals against. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbojangles Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 Edited : Man City = They have the same amount of Shots on Target as the League Leaders, are more accurate with them than the League Leaders, but lie close to the relegation Zone ???????? Defending is so obviously the problem there then surely ?? Nail on the head Singh Hopefully we will address this very shortly. (insert fingers crossed smily) I agree, signing kaka will help with your goals against. Or, we could carry on leaking goals but as long as we score more in a game than we let in, it's still the same result Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkkjames Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 Edited : Man City = They have the same amount of Shots on Target as the League Leaders, are more accurate with them than the League Leaders, but lie close to the relegation Zone ???????? Defending is so obviously the problem there then surely ?? Nail on the head Singh Hopefully we will address this very shortly. (insert fingers crossed smily) I agree, signing kaka will help with your goals against. Or, we could carry on leaking goals but as long as we score more in a game than we let in, it's still the same result BJ, losing 5-4 instead of 5-1 is the same result mate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbojangles Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 Edited : Man City = They have the same amount of Shots on Target as the League Leaders, are more accurate with them than the League Leaders, but lie close to the relegation Zone ???????? Defending is so obviously the problem there then surely ?? Nail on the head Singh Hopefully we will address this very shortly. (insert fingers crossed smily) I agree, signing kaka will help with your goals against. Or, we could carry on leaking goals but as long as we score more in a game than we let in, it's still the same result BJ, losing 5-4 instead of 5-1 is the same result mate. James, re-read my post. I said as long as we score MORE in a game than we let in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkkjames Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 Edited : Man City = They have the same amount of Shots on Target as the League Leaders, are more accurate with them than the League Leaders, but lie close to the relegation Zone ???????? Defending is so obviously the problem there then surely ?? Nail on the head Singh Hopefully we will address this very shortly. (insert fingers crossed smily) I agree, signing kaka will help with your goals against. Or, we could carry on leaking goals but as long as we score more in a game than we let in, it's still the same result BJ, losing 5-4 instead of 5-1 is the same result mate. James, re-read my post. I said as long as we score MORE in a game than we let in. Yes I did bj, but i mentioned kaka and you mentioned scoring more,,,anyways, me thinks you need to spend 50 million x2 on defenders and forget kaka the great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbojangles Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 Edited : Man City = They have the same amount of Shots on Target as the League Leaders, are more accurate with them than the League Leaders, but lie close to the relegation Zone ???????? Defending is so obviously the problem there then surely ?? Nail on the head Singh Hopefully we will address this very shortly. (insert fingers crossed smily) I agree, signing kaka will help with your goals against. Or, we could carry on leaking goals but as long as we score more in a game than we let in, it's still the same result BJ, losing 5-4 instead of 5-1 is the same result mate. James, re-read my post. I said as long as we score MORE in a game than we let in. Yes I did bj, but i mentioned kaka and you mentioned scoring more,,,anyways, me thinks you need to spend 50 million x2 on defenders and forget kaka the great. We have enough money to buy Kaka and others. Surely you wouldn't turn down Kaka, if he said he'd go to United would you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkkjames Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 Edited : Man City = They have the same amount of Shots on Target as the League Leaders, are more accurate with them than the League Leaders, but lie close to the relegation Zone ???????? Defending is so obviously the problem there then surely ?? Nail on the head Singh Hopefully we will address this very shortly. (insert fingers crossed smily) I agree, signing kaka will help with your goals against. Or, we could carry on leaking goals but as long as we score more in a game than we let in, it's still the same result BJ, losing 5-4 instead of 5-1 is the same result mate. James, re-read my post. I said as long as we score MORE in a game than we let in. Yes I did bj, but i mentioned kaka and you mentioned scoring more,,,anyways, me thinks you need to spend 50 million x2 on defenders and forget kaka the great. We have enough money to buy Kaka and others. Surely you wouldn't turn down Kaka, if he said he'd go to United would you? am i the only one that thinks he is a tad over-rated? very very good no doubt but year on year touted as one of the top 3 players in the world? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevieH Posted January 14, 2009 Share Posted January 14, 2009 (edited) am i the only one that thinks he is a tad over-rated? very very good no doubt but year on year touted as one of the top 3 players in the world? you may well be. he's undoubtedly one of the handful of best players on the planet and has been consistently good year on year. edit: whether english football would suit him or not is another matter. Edited January 14, 2009 by StevieH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldgit Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 am i the only one that thinks he is a tad over-rated? very very good no doubt but year on year touted as one of the top 3 players in the world? you may well be. he's undoubtedly one of the handful of best players on the planet and has been consistently good year on year. edit: whether english football would suit him or not is another matter. He's young enough to adapt to the rigours of the Premiership and has pace while Shevchenko was a tortoise and should never have left AC Milan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkkjames Posted January 22, 2009 Share Posted January 22, 2009 found this site regarding who's hurt and for how long... http://www.physioroom.com/news/english_pre...njury_table.php Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparkles Posted January 22, 2009 Share Posted January 22, 2009 found this site regarding who's hurt and for how long... http://www.physioroom.com/news/english_pre...njury_table.php Excellent site , well done. I see Owen Hargreaves has "jumpers Knee' what the h-ell is that ? Another name for tendonitis ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkkjames Posted January 22, 2009 Share Posted January 22, 2009 (edited) found this site regarding who's hurt and for how long... http://www.physioroom.com/news/english_pre...njury_table.php Excellent site , well done. I see Owen Hargreaves has "jumpers Knee' what the h-ell is that ? Another name for tendonitis ? yes but how reliable is it, Anderson carried off on a stretcher with suspected broken ankle and no mention on this list??? Jumpers Knee - not sure what that is but thought I got that once while trying to do the mrs on the carpet. Edited January 22, 2009 by bkkjames Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSingh Posted January 23, 2009 Author Share Posted January 23, 2009 found this site regarding who's hurt and for how long... http://www.physioroom.com/news/english_pre...njury_table.php Excellent site , well done. I see Owen Hargreaves has "jumpers Knee' what the h-ell is that ? Another name for tendonitis ? yes but how reliable is it, Anderson carried off on a stretcher with suspected broken ankle and no mention on this list??? Jumpers Knee - not sure what that is but thought I got that once while trying to do the mrs on the carpet. Just to let you know Chaps, i've been looking at that Site for about 3 or 4 years & in my opinion it's very, very unreliable & i don't take a great deal of notice of it any more.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkkjames Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 speaking of stats, was wondering if any of you lads had the same feeling as I am (and no, I don't need to take a turd), but anyone have stats on goal scoring per game this year vs years past? I know we are down but how is the league as whole? If my suspicions are true, I reckon it's down to the fact that teams are / have splashed out on defensive minded players and are lining up more conservatively. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSingh Posted January 27, 2009 Author Share Posted January 27, 2009 speaking of stats, was wondering if any of you lads had the same feeling as I am (and no, I don't need to take a turd), but anyone have stats on goal scoring per game this year vs years past? I know we are down but how is the league as whole? If my suspicions are true, I reckon it's down to the fact that teams are / have splashed out on defensive minded players and are lining up more conservatively. You mean the League on the whole ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now