Forum explores harmonising of Thai healthcare schemes

[webfact]

Forum explores harmonising of healthcare schemes
PRATCH RUJIVANAROM
THE NATION

BANGKOK: -- A FORUM in Bangkok this week was seen as a preliminary step in the country's move to create a National Health Security Council to harmonise the three healthcare schemes - Universal Healthcare Scheme, Social Security Scheme and the Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme.

The First National Conference on Thai Universal Health Coverage was hosted by a coordination committee for health security, which concluded yesterday.

A major topic of the forum was to achieve equal and fair health standards among all levels of the population by reforming the health security system.

In seeking ideas for a Universal Health Coverage (UHC) system, experts stressed the need for public participation and localisation to ensure this equality around the country.

"A strong public role is needed both to achieve universal coverage and to ensure equitable access and use of the health system," said Prof Anne Mills from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicines in the UK.

Mills said she drew from the experience of country members in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

She concluded that the wealth of the country to subsidise a fund for a UHC system was not the major factor in establishing a successful health security system which provided equal access to healthcare for all the population.

She cited the US, where the most funds were spent on the healthcare system - but it ranked worst on the list of OECD countries for health equity.

"In a more diverse health system, a stronger public role is critically needed to ensure the equality of health," she said.

Dr Narongsak Angkasuwapla, former deputy public health minister, agreed that localisation of the health security system was equally important in health security system management.

"Thailand is a big country with a lot of regions. Each has its own problems, therefore the centralised health security policies may not be relevant and suitable to address individual regional problems," Narongsak said.

He suggested local interests should be enhanced into the health security system by allowing local people to participate in the system.

"Locals should have the ability to determine that central policies were appropriate for them and they should take part in the health development in their region," he said.

On the other aspect of equity in the health security system, Mills suggested that different levels of equity should be guaranteed. Groups of people with different needs should have access to the specialised healthcare they requir-ed, while those with similar healthcare needs should have their kind of healthcare services within reach.

Prof Ammar Siamwalla, on the coordination panel for the health security chairman, said this forum was just a first step and it was too early to come out with substantial plans for all health schemes.

He admitted the harmony needed to bring these parties together would be hard to achieve. There were still many different opinions among the agencies responsible for each health scheme.

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/national/Forum-explores-harmonising-of-healthcare-schemes-30273273.html


-- The Nation 2015-11-19

[JoePai]

Nice idea but too many vestige interests.

[Daniel Boon]

the problem with 'localised' coverage will be that instead of claims spread over the greater population, will cause problems locally; however, it could also lead to barring certain coverage prevalent to local conditioncs

[connda]

Just change 'Harmonising'<sic> to 'Privatizing' and I think you'll find the head of the nail that insurance lobbyists are planning to hit with their big old lobby hammer.