Exsexyman

Why don't you link to a credible source instead of a loony blog, if you want o prove your point? I very much doubt if you can find one telling the same story.

Sigh!

http://www.theguardian.com/world/richard-adams-blog/2011/may/24/binyamin-netanyahu-congress-ovation

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/05/israeli-prime-minister-gets-20-standing-ovations-in-congress-sends-message-to-white-house/

Twenty nine orchestrated standing ovations! Even Stalin would have struggled to match that!

According to some nutty far-left blog. Really convincing.

How about The guardian? ABC News? Too many other sources who counted them to list here. But that's OK, you just carry on burying your head in the sand and adding your favourite childish little emoticon to try and discredit anything that counters your blinkered views. Whether you like it or not there were 29 orchestrated standing ovations, and also whether you like it or not that is positively Stalinist.

A lack of knowledge, understanding, and education.

Aw, don't be so hard on yourself!

Netanyahu’s well-funded Jewish conservative backers say they may use their funds to draw attention in the districts and states of any Democratic lawmaker who is not present at the US Capitol.

A similar threat was made during Netanyahu's ludicrous 'Speech of a Lifetime' where he received 29 standing ovations and showed to the world the U.S. is absolutely in thrall to a foreign power.

'AIPAC staffers who prowl congressional offices daily, let it be known that videos of the Members listening to Bibi would be kept on file and insinuated that how the Member’s performed during his speech to Congress would be taken into consideration when planning this summer’s Jewish fundraising events.'

This piece explains how Bibi got his 'spontaneous' standing ovations... http://mycatbirdseat.com/2011/05/franklin-lamb-is-the-arab-spring-spreading-to-us-congressional-staffs/

I do hope Netanyahu attends. The damage he did to U.S. prestige around the world (as if there were any left), last time, was colossal.

Twenty nine orchestrated standing ovations! Even Stalin would have struggled to match that!

Boomerangutang asserted: Iran and ISIS have a lot more in common than they have to clash about?

Morch responded: Like what?

I don't have it out for Iran. I was once ably assisted by an Iranian-American when I was in a tight spot, and he didn't even ask compensation for helping me out.

I know Iranians are Persian rather than Arab. Here's what they have in common with ISIS:

>>> fanatically Muslim

>>> keep women down, and assert women are inherently dirty and inferior

>>> snuff out freedom of press

>>> strongly back Sharia Law

>>> harsh medieval punishment for even minor offenses.

>>> Shouting 'Allah Akbar' in regard to anything/everything.

>>> Hate America

Granted, Afghanistan is more likely to side with ISIS, than Iran. But still, extremist cult beliefs can be binding. The only basic difference between Sunnis and Shi'ites stems from some some (obscure, to outsiders) interpretation of some event which happened hundreds of years ago. I have to read-up again on it. Yet, to keep the fires burning (literally and figuratively) for some family quarrel from hundreds of years ago appears near-ridiculous to forward-thinking westerners. It's as if they're straining to find things to quarrel about - and succeeding.

Over recent years the ratio of females against males entering higher education in Iran has risen to 60%. How do you square this with your outright falsehood, "Keep women down, and assert women are inherently dirty and inferior"? Not just higher education either, according to UNESCO world survey, Iran has the highest female to male ratio at primary level of enrollment in the world among sovereign nations, with a girl to boy ratio of 1.22 : 1.00.

You really should try and educate yourself a bit more before spouting bigoted nonsense.

Think you are confusing them with back door boys Khun Costas

Well, he is Greek, so "back door" is very natural for him

I understand that "back door action" is pretty much the norm in Greece, i read somewhere ages ago that the average Greek male likes to indulge at least twice a day. Which of course explains why their buildings are all ruins and their economy is down the toilet.

What's wrong with The Wurzles?

They single- handedly destroyed the image of the West Country farmer as a man of modern times, equipped with up-to-date technology and mindful of environmental consequences, instead they portrayed him as a man with a voracious sexual appetite only able to express himself through grunts and various ooh arrs.

Apart from the crap tunes of course.

Since when did West Country farmers have an image as a man of modern times and equipped with up-to-date technology, mindful of environmental consequences? Zummerzet's the only place I know where they drink pink diesel and run their tractors on scrumpy, and vice versa depending on the season.

I enjoyed the two clips in the Original Post, though - thanks for reposting.

SC

The Wurzels were never the same after their lead singer, the legendary Adge Cutler popped his clogs.

I couldnt stand this pompous self indulgant crap.

As if the above wasnt bad enough, along came this rubbish.

Thankfully salvation was at hand in the form of punk.

Aw c'mon, the BeeGees were grrrreat.

Not even the best drummer in the Beatles so the joke goes.

That may be so, but he makes a mean slice of toast!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XE45EM4POsw&feature=player_embedded

Best Floyd albums the first 2,piper at the gates of dawn and relics,if you don't know them ,you don't know the floyd

Floyd's first two albums were 'Piper at the gates of dawn' and 'Saucer full of secrets'. If you don't know that you don't know The Floyd!

I think his point is that many anti-Semites substitute the word "Zionists" for Jews to cover up their real intent. They are bigots, but smart enough to try to hide it.

Yes, it is very common to hide hatred against Jews and irrational opposition to the very existence of Israel behind the safer term anti-Zionist. It's curious how many "anti-Zionists" are against all peoples having the right to self determination in a nation state, such as Thais. Almost none. But the focus is only on JEWS not being worthy of the privilege of identification with a nation state.

There are a few problems with your victim mentality in this issue.

The anti-Zionists do not hide behind the term at all, and their focus is on Zionists (who happen to be Jews), not Jews per se. If their criticism of Zionists overflows, it is upon Israelis, not Jews per se, as it is the Israeli electorate that keeps on voting in the governments whose Zionist policies pervade.

And that should be fair enough...after all, look at all the condemnation of all Muslims because they don't speak out about Islamic extremism. Hmmm?

It should be pointed out that many Zionists are not Jews. Tony Blair, G W. Bush, Rupert Murdoch to name but three powerful people. Most of the true anti semites, the skinheaded knee jerk anti-semites wouldn't understand this at all, indeed the vast majority of them probably haven't got a clue what Zionist means! Criticism of Zioinists and their policies is perfectly legitimate. The problem is that when this criticism starts to hit the mark, sometimes Zionists have their own knee jerk response, they immediately accuse the critics of being ant-semite. Of course some of the critics are anti-semites, it is naive to suggest otherwise. But the actual premise of the criticism is still there. And will never be addressed because once the anti-semite card has been played, end of discussion. This is what happens, time after time. The questions raised in the criticism will be a taboo subject. People should be allowed to express their views of Israeli policies without always being called anti-semites as soon as the point they are making becomes a difficult one to answer by Zionist supporters. If i call Tony Blair a Zionist does that make me an Anti-Semite? Ridiculous!

Just find a Thai lady you don't like and buy her a house and pick up. Saves a lot of time and stress in the long run.

My son is getting the overnight bus from Chiang Rai to Pattaya, due in at 09-00 AM. Could someone tell which bus station in Pattaya it will arrive in. Many thanks in advance.

Eeek.

I must owe millions.

Lets face it, it is an uncontrollable piece of flesh sometimes!

There are days when I really like your posts. ☺

Then there are those other days?

Today is a ☺ day.

Just a wee note to say.

We are all trying to find as much information as we can that might be helpful to the trial.

"We are all trying to find as much information as we can that might be helpful to the trial"

As if anyone involved with the trial is going to take anything you say seriously given your track record on here. Talk about delusions of grandeur! Hysterical!

Her parents have flown out to the island ? Or are they trying to make it sound like they were there all along.. This is the sort of reporting that gets peoples suspicions up.

Perhaps they are just stating a fact and not trying to suggest anything else like you are. There is nothing suspicious about the reporting at all except in the minds of the conspirators.

Perhaps her parents have knowledge of an ongoing medical condition which leads them to state she died of natural causes. By her own admission she was taking copious amounts of various drugs mixed with copious amounts of alcohol. But to the likes of berybert and his little band of obsessive Enid Blyton Famous Five playing at detectives types this will never be considered. Just because they desperately want it to have been murder doesn't mean that it was.

Ah, yes, yet another impotent sucker who would otherwise have done nothing but talk, entrapped by the finest law enforcement agency in the world.

I feel so much safer.

Well done, Federal Bureau of Inveiglement.

Spot on.

It's the same old story.

The timing is usually significant as well.

Various players in the military/security industry have at one time or another during periods of prosperity or crisis garnered massive "what if" budgets. Not only do they want to keep getting this "what if" money, even if it means scaring the bejesus out of every man/woman & child in their jurisdictional purview they'd lots more of it.

That's why they scare people with this.

It's a cycle, really, as well as a basic "narc" play.

The useful idiots that get pulled in as perpetrators, terrorists or what have you are just hapless fools looking to establish identity. In the majority of cases without their FBI, CIA, NSA "handlers" these guys couldn't find their @$$e$ with both hands and a flashlight.

Give a local ethnic crim a few bucks, an operating budget, guidance, and some "relief from scrutiny", to get these bozo PATSIES in play and (guess what) . . . . . He eventually WILL, okay ?.

The deed is done. Can be horrific. Can be monstrous. Can be "nipped in the planning stages"

The terrorist bozos are then harvested as fodder for the incredibly consensus prone, simplicity prone, hater prone (cough, cough) media.

The usual band of nitwits takes valuable time off watching "Dancing With the Stars" and "pro poker" to suck up this new improved reality TV.

CNN and Fox wheel in their bombastic, "scarificationist" terrorism experts to put the final nonsense pronouncement onto the whole stinking stew of lies, conjecture and waste.

Who benefits from this kind of dross ?

Well, Funseekers, how 'bout we just follow the money.

Isn't it strange that these would be domestic 'terrorists' never have any friends apart from confidential FBI informants. It really is an extraordinary coincidence!

Another sad lone nutter manipulated and entrapped by the FBI. I suppose it makes it look as if they are doing something to justify their huge budget.

Some French Muslim kids at school refuse to participate in moment of silence for terror victims.

http://therightscoop.com/french-muslim-children-refused-to-participate-in-schools-moment-of-silence-for-terror-victims/

Shocking! Let's hope their hides were belted.

gladly oblige.

British, Irish, Hitler?

What has this got to do with Charlie???

Absolutely nothing! But some here love to go for a bit of deflection whenever Islam is criticized.

Charlie Hebdo's latest edition to depict Prophet Muhammad

The cover of the latest edition of satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo has been published in French media, and depicts the Prophet Muhammad.

The cover shows the Prophet holding a sign reading "I am Charlie", below the words "all is forgiven"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-30786211

And the BBC doesn't show the cover. Typical!

From the BBC today. They do show the cover. So you are wrong again. Typical.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-30794973

Yet you hope to ban a race of people + run out all that are already there? Perhaps already legal citizens

with the same rights as You & I?

The 7/7 bombers, the shoe bomber, the underwear bomber, the Lee Rigby attackers, the Glasgow Airport attackers and the Rotherham rapists were all legal citizens, weren't they?

Those that are British (and several never were) are mostly dual nationals. A Home Officer barrister has contended that they could therefore, under the British Nationality Act 2006, be stripped of British nationality at least as readily as foreigners can be deported. Some may since have secured their status be renouncing the other nationality.

Some 'legal UK citizens' celebration the Paris murders.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABKJYR2LI34

That video is five months old, although i suspect you already knew that before you posted it. Your agenda is now exposed for all on here to see. You besmirch the memories of the murdered staff in Paris with your attempt to ratchet up the hatred by posting clear untruths. You are probably too dull to comprehend it, but you have stooped to the same level as the Islamic lunatic murderers. Shame on you.

The victim here was not someone from a trailer park, she was actually a nuclear scientist, so presumably an educated and intelligent person. It beggars belief that she could be so negligent and stupid.

Duke of York strenuously denies he had ten thousand men

January 5, 2015

Buckingham Palace has issued a strong denial that the Duke of York, Prince Andrew, has been involved in bizarre hill marching based sexual practices.

According to reports up to ten thousand men are alleged to have been involved in incidents involving the Duke.

One participant, who cannot be named for legal reasons said Me and loads of other guys were offered money to dress up in early 19th century uniforms and then march to the top of a hill.

When we got there we were greeted by an extremely excited Prince Andrew. He was very giggly now I think about it.

Then, just when we thought it was all over, he seemed keen to make us march all the way back down again.

Another man, who also claims to have been involved claimed He was quite firm about it, when we were up we were up and when we were down we were down.

Denying the claims a Buckingham Palace spokesman told us, All allegations in this matter are false, and records will clearly show these men were neither up nor down.

http://newsthump.com/2015/01/05/duke-of-york-strenuously-denies-he-had-ten-thousand-men/

Ah yes.

'The grand old Duke of York'

He had ten thousand men'

'And his case comes up next Tuesday'