Misterwhisper

What a hypocrite. She wouldn't be seen dead with a farmers' scarf tied around her waist when she frequents obscenely expensive clubs and restaurants in Bangkok and Chiang Mai with her posse of coat-tailing sycophant friends.

On another note: it might be the photo's low resolution... but why is she having a white moustache gracing her upper lip? Milk fan? Foaming at the mouth? Or... (noooo, discard that thought!!!)

7 hours ago, mrwebb8825 said:

 

Then this is a poll of the truly out of touch and/or stupid because before making it legal, children and youth made up 70-80% of the users. Those are the people that didn't think or care about jail for getting high.

 

Are these same people concerned over the inappropriate/illegal use of tobacco and alcohol among children and youth?

...or the appalling traffic death toll among young Thais?

So.... at which school was that picture taken? Just curious...

When was that groundbreaking decision brainstormed? During a "hemp luncheon"?

5 hours ago, chang1 said:

How long before 7-11s have bedrooms?

...and room service.

16 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

to prevent abuse of cannabis and hemp among students and teaching staff

I can only imagine the scenes that must've been going on in faculty lounges since June 9. Afternoon classes probably had to be suspended most days as teachers were incapable of crawling to the class rooms after "lunch". Not that the students were in any better shape...

Isn't it amazing how quickly that much trumpeted blanket "cannabis liberalization" has been curtailed again - all in the span of just 1 week?

And that happens soooo frequently in Thailand, with laws being issued in a hurry without having been thought through, turning out to have more holes than my great-grandma's self-knitted woolen stockings. 

2 hours ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

What happened to Harold? 

He went on to marry his 18-year-old Swedish au-pair after realizing that Natt had been clipping other guys' toe nails, too..

3 hours ago, Seismic said:

Technically porn stars are not prostitutes, because they are not paid for sex, they are paid to act.

So are prostitutes...

5 hours ago, Inala said:

She's lovely, although there is a hint of hardness in her face. Right age. I think she would probably make for an interesting life partner. Not boring like some typical 'good' Thai farm girls...

You really shouldn't judge books by their boobs covers.

6 hours ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

I remember her, she looks different with her clothes on. 

 

Isn't that a quote from a James Bond film, "The Man with the Golden Gun"?

Bond: "Oh, Miss Anders, I didn't recognize you with your clothes on."

8 hours ago, webfact said:

In 2012 she made more headlines after marrying an American millionaire who was nearly twice her age. The marriage didn’t work out and they were divorced five years later.

I remember that, including the rather picante photos showing Natt lovingly clipping the thick toe nails of her geezer husband, "Harold", who insisted that she was his true sole mate and that their love would last forever. Of course, there soon emerged rumors that she apparently was also clipping the toe nails of a few other guys...  

20 hours ago, marin said:

I prefer the old way that was 350 a gram.????

 

But legal now I guess. ????

I preferred the really old way.... when a whole bag of sticky flowers and buds (20 grams) was.... 40 baht. That was in the mid-1990s, of course.

6 hours ago, RichardColeman said:

Geoff Goldblum is mayor of Prachin Buri ? 

Yep... and life he will find a way (across the border).

How did the PM so eloquently call it? Ah yes, "exporting Thai culture to the world"... 

4 hours ago, steven100 said:

surely that beach cannot be Thailand,  there's no trash anywhere and the water is blue.

The hundreds of banana boats, scooters, snorkeling platforms and longtail boats that usually prevent beachgoers from seeing the water at all also are missing...  

3 hours ago, hotchilli said:

And if law enforcement are too damn lazy to do anything feel free to post it on social media to get them off the fat rear-ends.

I bet that's against against the law, too.

We all know by whom and for whom these laws are made.

1 hour ago, Dumbfounded said:

Any part of the plant over 0.2% is illegal, the buds cannot be used in food or for smoking as anything above 0.2% is still considered a Category 5 drug and will be prosecuted. This isn't a law, it's a joke

Thank you! Finally someone says it. Because the media - including the OP - still reports it wrongly. The OP for example only refers to "oil extracts".

I wonder why this is all so difficult to understand.

EVERY part of or substance derived from hemp/cannabis plant that has a THC content of more than 0.2% (either by dried or liquid weight) remains ILLEGAL.