Jump to content

mrfill

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    3,589
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mrfill

  1. 35 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

    Yes, the motorcylist should not have been there but (and yes there's a but) the Kiwi seems to be moving pretty quick (hard to tell but sure flies past the truck and the white pickup) but how did he not see the motorcycle. The middle lane was clear to move into to avoid the collision and there seems to be absolutely no movement to avoid.?

    You do realise that the helpful circle around the motorcycle was added later, I trust. With a likely closing speed around 120mph and no headlight, it is not easy to see and reaction time would have to include the time taken to realise that it was really happening.

    • Like 2
  2. 51 minutes ago, BestB said:

    He was not in public, but on a private property, he did not asked to be filmed, nor had given permission for video to be posted.

     

    It does not say he was on overstay, when you handed over to immigration you get deported, you do not get handed over for a cup of coffee.

     

    Furthermore read this again 

     

    It was not stated in the story that he was being deported but INN quoted police spokesman Pol Col Krissana Pattanacharoen as saying that the cops had not stood still in the matter and that they were determined to stamp out wrongdoing by foreigners including people on overstay.

     

    Yes it was a private party at a private venue, do not need to be a lawyer to figure this one out, unless you think hotel is a public property.

     

    There was entry fee which makes it a private party once again held at a privately owned venue.

     

    There was no sex act or nudity but silly acting.

     

    It makes no difference where hotel is located or where pool is visible, it is still a private property

    So if I pay an entry fee to go to a televised football game with 99,999 others at a privately owned ground, you don't consider that to be public?

    But then if it is private, you don't need permission to film - or do you always give permission to be filmed with CCTV on private premises?

  3. 55 minutes ago, CLW said:
    1 hour ago, happy chappie said:
    A few of these would be handy.cant understand how a place like phuket with 10,000s of people going into the sea each day haven't got anything like this..
    IMG_2422.JPG.e2b65d0d0e53cbae11d690e74b02f43f.JPG
    IMG_2423.JPG.9bac3a43a63f93615b5912f18e57ec25.JPG

    Because it costs money to buy and maintain them.

    And the ones illustrated cost the government £0. Not a bean. RNLI is a charity and is not government funded.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...