Jump to content

virtualtraveller

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    1,098
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by virtualtraveller

  1. Face it, which is acceptable 1) replacing top level civil servants with ones you trust 2) putting your own family members into key positions, merit aside. The case is linked to both you can't morally say one is fine but not the other.

    But the bigger pic is that PTP abused their governing privileges and nothing could stop them doing that, except of course a court abusing their judicial interpretations.

  2. She was controversially the clone Prime Minister at the centre of a short-lived and interesting political experiment by Puea Thai, whereby you have a puppet prime minister and the real person in charge is someone 'the people' did not vote for, and is ineligible for an official political role because he's a fugitive from justice. Of course, you cannot have a democracy where the person making the decisions is never accountable. You cannot have a man in Dubai telling the Thai govt to gamble 400 billion baht on a rice scheme, then shrug it off when it doesn't work out. You cannot call that democracy. The courts were right to take her down because someone has to accept responsibility for absurd policies directed from illegitimate leader. Peua Thai can't have it both ways, if they want elections then they need to let themselves be lead by the PM and team who were elected.

    • Like 1
  3. This writer has just landed from Mars! The boycott of the election was the least of the problems, let's remind ourselves that the previous elections produced an autocratic leadership dominating parliament for selfish gains leading to massive discontent on the streets. Any elections without fixing that is a waste of time. And considering how much money is involved the Dems are wasting their time competing with an incumbent that has squirrelled away 100 billion plus in rice money, just waiting for an election.

    Abhisit might be part of the problem, but a smaller part, and as one of the antagonists he's at least making a sincere effort to address the underlying problem, the other side is just in denial.

    To be clear, the problem IS NOT about elections, it's about a deeply flawed society resulting in a dysfunctional democracy that has been perverted by money politics, corruption, lack of accountability and this notion of 'blank cheque' governance to the winners.

    The nation should have rejected this article, it's laughably naive!

  4. It's sad when someone dies relatively young, and I admire her for trying to pursue accountability and taking it international, but I have to disagree with her on 'seeking justice'. Listening to her, seems that she became emotionally involved after the death of her brother and fell in line with all the red propaganda that Abhisit 'ordered' the 'murder' of her brother. It was a complicated situation with plenty of different people complicit to varying degrees of intention or duty. There will never be 'justice' for these people because their idea of 'justice' is built on misinformation, false ideology and deceptive agendas.

  5. Whatever it is, it's unsurprisingly being managed in an unplanned chaotic manner, with no uniformity and obviously no guidance from MoE. Should have made it compulsory for Unis then schools follow later. Biggest problem is it creates a 6 month shortfall in revenue to pay school fees. Well, this a private sector concern, but a summer camp situation might not be a bad idea focusing on new teaching skills, take the time to upgrade all the teaching methodology.

    • Like 1
  6. There is no neutral group left, save for the king. He is the only one with authority and respect to make all sides step back and find common ground towards a solution. This crisis has been steadily drifting towards this solution except that it needed to first become deadlocked. Whether the proposal is from Thaksin, Prem or whoever is irrelevant, it is a attempt at mediated solution. The king has deliberately stayed out of it in order to remain impartial, I'm sure we can rely on his judgment to accept or modify a proposal, should he choose to, that would be fair. If its not acceptable to any particular party then perhaps it's because that party is angling for some unfair advantage or to preserve an unbalanced status quo that suits them.

    • Like 2
  7. After they get a few MPs, I'm sure Thaksin will make them a generous offer to abdicate to his latest party. Thaksin had only one accurate political insight, that most Thai politicians are bought cheaply and easily.

    Aye, that be the truth, I couldn't have put it more succinctly myself. That is why Prompong showed up with some flowers, wishing them well.

×
×
  • Create New...