- Popular Post
attrayant
-
Posts
5,202 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by attrayant
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
23 minutes ago, mcambl61 said:Again, show real actual evidence
That Bannon, a white supremacist, was Trump's chief adviser is REAL. That is a true statement. Based on that REAL, ACTUAL thing that happened, it is EVIDENT that Trump and his party leadership support white supremacists. This is not just a baseless claim or opinion of mine.
I don't know what else you want. What would qualify as evidence to you?
- 1
- 1
- 2
-
- Popular Post
4 minutes ago, BobBKK said:He said what we all know as fact. No evidence but let's wait the FBI report.
Why wait for the FBI report if you already have all the facts?
- 4
-
What if devices are in the checked luggage? By the time you're waiting for your luggage to come around on that conveyor belt, you're already well past all security checks.
I guess if I have to fly internationally, I'll wipe my devices before I leave and restore them after I'm safely out of the airport.
-
Most people would use a wish to cure cancer, eliminate child poverty or world hunger. But...
2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:I wish people would stop repeating the propaganda that [Obama] is a 100% black man.
...is just bizarre.
- 2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
25 minutes ago, mcambl61 said:Please show the real logical evidence of supporting white supremacists.
Are you pretending to forget that Steve Bannon was Trump's chief strategist and, for a while, was on the national security council?
- 2
- 1
-
13 minutes ago, mcambl61 said:
Right then, so the party of emotionally irrational activists harassing and shouting down people, pouring drinks on innocent people on the right and an occasional attempted assissination of a congressman. And all of a sudden it is a retaliation and justified?
So I guess you're not going to stop whining then? Perhaps it was too much to hope for.
Did you see the examples I gave?
The Merrick Garland incident: republicans being obstructionists and refusing to allow hearings on judicial nominations, even below the supreme court.
Gerrymandering: election hijacking, plain and simple. In what kind of an election could your party win 53% of the vote but get 77% of the seats? Answer: a hijacked one.
Push-polls: Would you still vote for Trump if you knew that he fathered an illegitimate black child?
Finally, there is Mitch McTurtle standing on the floor of the senate announcing his obdurate, obstructionist intentions.
Show me where I said anything about attempted assassination.
- 1
- 1
- 1
-
The Story of Trump's Family Wealth
Seems his daddy suckled at the government's teat for a good while.
-
51 minutes ago, impulse said:
A lot of my so called friends never forgave me when I quit drinking. My image with them worsened immensely when I quit getting drunk and spending a wad every weekend buying rounds.
My image may have worsened, but the quality of my life and my self esteem (and my bank account) sure did benefit.
You should call the FBI and inform them of this immediately.
-
And Trump has not proven anything merely by claiming innocence.
-
- Popular Post
Krugman gets a bull's-eye with his piece in the NY Times: The Angry White Male Caucus
“[Trump’s] jihad against Barack Obama was fueled by envy: Obama was a black man who was also a class act, with all the grace and poise Trump lacks. And Trump couldn’t stand it.
Kavanaugh is clearly cut from the same cloth, and not just because he rivals Trump in his propensity for lying about matters great and small."
The highly privileged are afraid of losing their privilege to social change.
- 7
- 1
-
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, NaamGin said:This story has already been refuted by Trump, stating that the IRS signed off on these types of transactions long ago.
You don't seem to know what the word 'refute' means.
- 3
- 2
-
- Popular Post
It's NAFTA version 1.1. Just some minor tweaks have been added.
- 3
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
5 hours ago, mcambl61 said:completely uncorroborated accusations with information withheld on purpose to delay the conformation while the ranking dem senator schemed to have certain activists attorneys appointed, no coincidence at all....really. then pretending to have a fear of flying all the while she is flying everywhere.
Sauce for the goose. I'm tired of democrats always taking the high road; refusing to give in to the temptation of playing dirty, and then losing seats to morally bankrupt, mud-throwing republicans. After the Merrick Garland incident, gerrymandering, push-polls and all the other dirty tricks republicans like to play, I am all for democrats fighting fire with fire.
Stop whining about democrats doing things that republicans have made into an art form.
- 5
- 1
- 1
-
6 hours ago, Boon Mee said:
Coupled with a little nudging from Trump, amazing progress.
Are you trying to make the entire United Nations assembly laugh out loud again?
-
- Popular Post
Good signs of progress between these two nations. The South Korean President was elected on a promise to get relations with the North back on track and he seems to be making good on that promise.
- 7
-
5 minutes ago, NaamGin said:
Link to BusinessInsider provided in my previous reply which referenced the AP author on the topic.
"People familiar with the contacts say the interactions have done nothing thus far to quell tensions over North Korea's nuclear weapons and missile advances, which are now fueling fears of military confrontation."
"the interactions have done nothing"
"But they say the behind-the-scenes discussions could still be a foundation for more serious negotiation, including on North Korea's nuclear weapons, should President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un put aside the bellicose rhetoric of recent days and endorse a dialogue."
"could still be"
The AP gave Trump the equivalent of a participation trophy. Better luck next time, Donald.
Meanwhile, how are things progressing? Trump blames stagnant North Korea talks on US-China trade war (that he started).
- 2
-
8 minutes ago, NaamGin said:
I have facts.
Why don't you present them?
8 minutes ago, NaamGin said:After decades of isolationism, why would Kim all of a sudden end this era and extend an olive branch to SK? Simply because he announces that his nuclear program is complete, so now he wants to dismantle it? All of this happened in a vacuum, right?
After decades of isolationism, why would Kim all of a sudden end this era and extend an olive branch to the USA? Simply because he announces that his nuclear program is complete, so now he wants to dismantle it? All of this happened in a vacuum, right?
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
And thus begins the politicization and devaluation of the judiciary; formerly one of America's most trusted institutions.
- 4
- 1
- 2
-
- Popular Post
10 minutes ago, NaamGin said:This was a direct result the Trump administrations negotiations with Kim Jung Un.
There had been no negotiations with Trump prior to that meeting, unless you count name-calling on Twitter as a form of negotiating. There had been some talks between the north and south earlier, in January and February. Here's the timeline. Clearly, things start happening in early 2018:
https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/dprkchron
Can you describe whatever negotiations you're referring to? What agreements were reached as a result of your imagined negotiations?
- 2
- 1
-
11 minutes ago, NaamGin said:
As far as "progress" being made, name one negotiation that led to NK denuclearization and normalization of relations with SK. Again, I will be waiting patiently.
April 27th, 2018: North Korean leader Kim Jong Un met with South Korean President Moon Jae-in. It's the first time a member of the Kim dynasty has set foot on southern soil since the end of the Korean War in 1953 and the latest bid to settle the world's last Cold War standoff.
- 1
-
8 minutes ago, melvinmelvin said:
if you look at the body language analysis video somebody posted a day or two ago, you will learn that the lady was left with rather few positive words
A woman recounting and reliving her sexual assault in front of a panel of men had rather few positive words? Shocking!
- 2
-
- Popular Post
4 minutes ago, riclag said:In America your innocent until proven guilty!
Not in a job interview.
- 2
- 1
-
9 hours ago, UncleTouchyFingers said:
By the way, you've got some nerve claiming that scrutinizing an appointee might "ruin the integrity of the court" when Kavanaugh himself has already done that with his spittle-filled rage directed at the committee, his claim that allegations against him are part of a left wing conspiracy to seek revenge on behalf of the Clintons. Does that sound like somebody who'll be impartial? Appointing him will only serve to further divide the court.
You yourself are hoping for him to wreak havoc purely out of spite:
9 hours ago, UncleTouchyFingers said:I also hope that Kavanaugh goes even harder right in his future rulings just out of spite for what Democrat politicians did to him, his family, and his future on the court.
How can you claim to have any interest in maintaining the integrity of the court with that kind of deplorable trash talk?
- 1
-
2 minutes ago, UncleTouchyFingers said:
You raped me in 1987 and I’ve been traumatized ever since.
Prove it didn’t happen.
Nope; can't prove that so let's not ruin the integrity of the court by appointing the nominee. See how easy it is not to ruin the integrity of the court?
- 2
Republicans aim to confirm Kavanaugh this weekend after FBI report
in World News
Posted
And as long as Trump wins, just screw everybody else, right? Even his constituents are getting screwed.
It's easy to win when you make up the rules as you go.