dr_lucas

Foreigners can easily get meds from the Thai Red Cross, for reasonable prices, probably much cheaper than anywhere else and identical to the prices Thais are paying.

They hopefully gonna teach the youth about HIV PEP and PrEP as well.

Courtesy of chatgpt: The statement contains a mix of historical linguistic facts and contemporary misunderstandings, and it reflects a common misconception. Here's a breakdown: ✅ Partly True (Linguistic Origin): The term "Semitic" originally refers to a language family, which includes Hebrew, Arabic, Aramaic, Amharic, and others. In that sense, both Jews and Arabs are "Semitic peoples" linguistically. ❌ Misleading or Incorrect (Modern Meaning of "Anti-Semitism"): The term "anti-Semitism" was coined in 19th-century Europe by German journalist Wilhelm Marr, and from the beginning, it specifically referred to hostility or prejudice against Jews, not against all Semitic peoples. In modern usage, "anti-Semitism" = anti-Jewish prejudice, not general hatred of Semitic-language speakers. Major organizations like the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), Oxford Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, and the UN all define anti-Semitism as specifically anti-Jewish. ⚠️ Misuse of the Linguistic Argument: Some people use the broader linguistic definition of "Semitic" to claim that "Arabs can't be anti-Semitic" or "Criticism of Jews isn't anti-Semitism", but these arguments misrepresent the actual historical and current usage of the term. The phrase "Jews don't have a monopoly on anti-Semitism" is often used to deflect or delegitimize concerns about anti-Jewish hate, which can veer into bad-faith or antisemitic rhetoric itself. ✅ Summary: Semitic = linguistic term for a group of languages (Hebrew, Arabic, etc.) Anti-Semitism = modern term for anti-Jewish hatred. It has nothing to do with Arabic speakers in this context. So, the post is technically semi-accurate on language, but misleading and wrong on the sociopolitical and historical meaning of "anti-Semitism". I'm not gonna even waste time responding to the rest of the biased nonsense in the post

Another Aussie? Deport him and blacklist all Aussies from entering Thailand. They're doing no good for this country.

Busted! lmao Obviously was talking about his own antisemitic feelings...

I think you forgot to mention "she" said "she" hates jews because they like to kill Christian babies and use their blood for baking and religious ceremonies...

There are more, but those are all Muslim countries which don't recognize Israel as a country, so maybe time to get a bit more education. Plus, got nothing to do with the topic. Also @MalcolmB

Although this may seem off-topic, the Maldives, a Muslim-majority country, has banned Israelis due to political reasons. No other country has enacted such a ban, and certainly not based on behavioral concerns. That said, judging by how often Brits, Indians, Chinese and Russians are brought up on this forum, it seems they'd be the ones first in line for a ban, definitely not the Israelis.

Illegal bike rental business...wow, hold on, let me load up my guns (and bring the entire island police for the bust)

SMS is so outdated. They should employ a system like the USA's Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA). It's part of the Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS) managed by FEMA. WEA sends emergency alerts to smartphones in a specific geographic area using cell broadcast technology. These alerts can include details about severe weather, AMBER alerts, or other critical emergencies, and they override silent mode to ensure they're noticed. Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA) don't use SMS because SMS technology has certain limitations that could delay or compromise the effectiveness of emergency alerts. Here are a few reasons why WEA is preferred: 1. Speed and Reach: WEA uses cell broadcast technology, which sends messages to all compatible devices in a specific geographic area almost instantly. SMS, on the other hand, sends messages individually to each recipient, which could cause delays, especially during high-demand situations. 2. Location Precision: WEA targets devices within a defined area, regardless of their phone numbers or carriers. SMS would require knowing and selecting specific phone numbers, which isn't practical for dynamic or geographically focused emergencies. 3. Reliability: During emergencies, cellular networks can become congested. SMS relies on the same infrastructure as voice and data, so it may fail or slow down. Cell broadcast used by WEA is more robust in such scenarios. 4. No Subscription Needed: WEA doesn’t require users to sign up or provide their phone numbers, ensuring everyone with a compatible device in the alert zone receives the message. SMS, by contrast, would require a list of recipients. WEA's design prioritizes speed, precision, and accessibility—key factors in life-saving emergency communications. It's all about ensuring critical information gets to the right people at the right time!

And I thought British manners are still a thing...

A lot more often than cancer risk (linked to overcooking/burning/toasting) and some of these can be fatal. Hot pan 1 minute each side depends on pan temperature, meat thickness, cooking method etc. To reduce risk of carcinogens, you can try using healthier cooking methods like baking, roasting, poaching, or slow cooking.

Raw or undercooked beef can contain bacteria like E. coli, Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Listeria, which can lead to food poisoning if not properly killed by cooking. Undercooked beef can also contain parasites like tapeworms or trichinella.

By your definition, there are numerous Israeli 'farangs.' A significant proportion of Jewish Israelis are of European descent or heritage, and many are indeed white.

If you need to ask, you probably haven't been to France lately...