Jump to content

Shivek

Banned
  • Posts

    795
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Shivek

  1. [How did ya guess i was from Malaysia?

    Because a Thai would never have known so much about football, and no-one in the main football nations would have said " What's the difference which name goes first" All over Europe and South America, a teams home is it's fortress. When you think back the years to 'Anfield', 'St James Park', Highbury', 'Elland Road' teams could just not go to these places and win. At least not twice. I discounted Africa,Japan, Korea as places that do not visit Thai Visa. That left only Malaysia and Singapore, and as I am one of the old firm, to me Malaysia and Singapore are much the same. Which part of Malaysia are you from?

    I'm from KL but livin in BKK. And Thais also know a lot of football dude. Dont understimate them. And i usually dont pay much attention in writing names in order. I usually just write according to my way but since that day when u said about home and way, u would have noticed that i'm writing according to the order.

  2. U

    Whats wrong in putting "U" instead of you? I think you are against everything i do and i say. Ok, i'll call them Chelsea. I got a bit angry that day so i wrote Chelscum. Sorry for that. And i've never ducked it, i'm from Malaysia. I think we can stop our arguement and be friends, cant we? But i suppose you're from UK and you're 40 yrs old right?

    Actually, I'm 58, big, fat and 'orrible. And I guessed you was from Malaysia anyway. But we've never had an argument. I don't argue with people. Wind them up; yes. Look at my signature :o:D

    How did ya guess i was from Malaysia?

  3. U dont like most of my posts so i think from today onwards i'm gonna stop posting here. But i actually knew u were joking, i know u very well dude.

    Goodbye.

    I have nothing against your posts. In fact I think they are informative, because you always post the latest press releases on football related stories. If I have anything against, then it's the childish " Chelsea Scum", which, for a guy that practically runs the football forum, and wants to be looked up to is out of order.

    Also I have asked you where you are from on three or four occaisions and you have ducked the issue every time. Why? And when I said sig, I meant info, like you have 'gunners 4 ever' now. And by the way I don't drink. It's funny that what Pie Boy said, cause you do have supermouths habit of putting U, instead of you.Maybe we can have some good sparring bouts on the forum as well. :o

    Whats wrong in putting "U" instead of you? I think you are against everything i do and i say. Ok, i'll call them Chelsea. I got a bit angry that day so i wrote Chelscum. Sorry for that. And i've never ducked it, i'm from Malaysia. I think we can stop our arguement and be friends, cant we? But i suppose you're from UK and you're 40 yrs old right?

  4. Lampscum10, what do u mean by using someone else's words? What words did i use were someone else's?

    i got this news from soccernet.com, so if u have any probs go shout at their forum.

    So the first half of your posting you say you wrote it, and in the second half you say you didn't.

    I see. Game of two halves is it? :o:D:D

    I meant that when u r telling about a game, u share the article so that readers believe you. Does does means copying someone's words? I dont think so, because i have always done this and at another forum baord people do it. But if u want, i can write it by myself next time.

    I think I've got it sussed Shivek. You're Thai aren't you. That is why all your posts are quotes, and things like when I questioned who was home and who was away, you said it didn't matter, and got all annoyed. Plus the fact that your sig a few weeks ago was ' Chelski headhunters' made me think you didn't know what that meant. Afew other thing make me think that you only know what you read about. I hold my hands up if I'm wrong, but I don't think so. Another thing what makes me think that, is your complete lack of sense of humour, and misunderstanding of jokes. Nothing to be ashamed of old mate. My wife's the same. :D

    Man, i dont like some of your humour coz it doesnt make me laugh but makes me annoyed and i always try to not talk or make prob with u. And secondly i'm not Thai. You like to really annoy someone until he doesnt know what he is writing. U dont like most of my posts so i think from today onwards i'm gonna stop posting here. But i actually knew u were joking, i know u very well dude. And i didnt have any sig written Chelsea headhunters, in fact i still dont have any sig coz i dont wanna have. So u must be drunk at the time u saw it. Dude, lets finish the topic here and i apologise for things i've said which u didnt like. I'm leaving.

    Goodbye.

  5. Lampscum10, what do u mean by using someone else's words? What words did i use were someone else's?

    i got this news from soccernet.com, so if u have any probs go shout at their forum.

    So the first half of your posting you say you wrote it, and in the second half you say you didn't.

    I see. Game of two halves is it? :o:D:D

    I meant that when u r telling about a game, u share the article so that readers believe you. Does does means copying someone's words? I dont think so, because i have always done this and at another forum baord people do it. But if u want, i can write it by myself next time.

  6. Roy Keane has stunned Manchester United by revealing he expects to leave Old Trafford at the end of the season.

    The Irishman's contract is due to expire in the summer and it was widely assumed he would be given at least an extra year, possibly to combine playing duties with a coaching role.

    However, in a live MUTV phone-in, Keane has rejected any likelihood of moving straight onto Sir Alex Ferguson's backroom staff and feels it will be the end of the season before United chief executive David Gill decides whether the 34-year-old will be handed an extension, by which time it will be too late.

    'I would like to play another year or two but I do not think it will be at Manchester United,' he said.

    'I would be surprised if I was offered a new contract and even if I was, I would not expect it to be until the end of the season but by then I will have already made a decision about what I am going to do.

    'There comes a time for everybody when they have to move on and I am prepared to play elsewhere.

    'I think it will be good to experience a different dressing room. It wouldn't be an English team though, coming back to Old Trafford and going into the away dressing room would be too hard for me to stomach.'

    The last statement is bound to alert Celtic, as Keane has made no secret of his desire to play for the Parkhead club at some stage in his career.

    Although he is currently sidelined with a broken foot, the prospect of United without Keane is virtually unthinkable.

    The fiery midfielder has been the inspiration behind Sir Alex Ferguson's side since he first arrived as a raw youngster from Nottingham Forest in 1993, making 480 senior appearances and playing a major role in almost all United's successes.

    Even though he missed the 1999 Champions League Final, the £3.75million Ferguson splashed out to secure his services will probably go down as some of the best money ever spent by United.

    However, it appears the United boss is losing his battle to keep Keane at the club.

    When the Cork-born player first mooted his intention to quit this summer in the middle of last season, he immediately received a telephone call from Ferguson informing him the Scot would be the man who decides when the midfielder will sever his ties with Old Trafford.

    Ferguson's position is not likely to have changed. Indeed, he will probably be reeling at tonight's announcement.

    But the harsh reality is if Keane is offered a new deal, it would almost certainly be for one year only and then on a pay-per-play basis, whereas at Celtic would almost certainly offer a better overall deal.

    In addition, Keane's departure has also been anticipated within the United hierarchy.

    One very senior Old Trafford official confided in private recently that the player may move away, before eventually returning to join the coaching staff.

    'I am not putting a gun to anybody's head,' said Keane. 'But my gut reaction last season was this would be my last year and I still feel that way.

    'You have to learn and be prepared to move on. Life will not stop when I leave Manchester United.

    'It might be an opportunity to go into management or coaching somewhere else and it is best to make a clean break because coaching at Manchester United doesn't really appeal.'

    Keane has made no secret of his desire to follow former Red Devils' skippers Steve Bruce and Bryan Robson into management and intends to complete his UEFA coaching badges over the next few months.

    But, interested lower league clubs who feel they may be able to attract the most influential domestic player of his generation, might be advised to look elsewhere.

    'I don't want to look too far ahead because I want to play on for a bit yet but I wouldn't want to drop too far down,' he said.

    'Your first job in management is an important one. I would like to go to a club with ambition, a decent fan base and some decent players.'

    Meanwhile, Keane said his international future would be thrashed out with Ireland coach Brian Kerr if his country failed to qualify for next summer's World Cup.

    The midfielder, who won the first of his 67 caps against Chile in 1991, came out of international retirement to try to help steer Brian Kerr's team to Germany next year and make up for missing out on the last tournament following his infamous pre-competition bust-up with Mick McCarthy.

    His current injury rules him out of next month's double-header with Cyprus and Switzerland and also possibly any play-off should the Republic secure second spot in their group.

    'I still think we have a chance to qualify,' he said. 'If we don't, we will I have to talk to Brian and see what happens but I don't want to cross that bridge before I get to it.'

  7. Lampscum10, what do u mean by using someone else's words? What words did i use were someone else's? And i think shame on u for not accepting that Pool deserved a win. And for ur info, i watched the match and next time i would give my own report so some people dont start shouting for no reason. And i didnt write anything which i wanna see, i just wrote what should've happened. And Lampscum10, i got this news from soccernet.com, so if u have any probs go shout at their forum.

  8. Chelsea survived two penalty appeals as Liverpool shaded the Champions League group G clash at Anfield.

    Referee Massimo De Santis rejected their claims for a first-half spot-kick when Sami Hyypia was clearly fouled by Didier Drogba and did the same after the break when William Gallas handled a header from Jamie Carragher.

    Liverpool dominated the game, especially in the second half, but like so many other teams this season they were unable to break down Chelsea's mean-spirited defence and both sides settled for a a share of the spoils ahead of their Premiership meeting on Merseyside this Sunday.

    Much of the pre-match hype had been about Chelsea's eagerness to exact revenge for last season's semi-final defeat in this competition.

    But Liverpool, inspired by Steven Gerrard and Xabi Alonso, showed drive and composure to end Chelsea's 100% record this season.

    Reds boss Rafael Benitez restored Steve Finnan, Luis Garcia, Djibril Cisse and Djimi Traore to his line-up, leaving Josemi, Stephen Warnock, Bolo Zenden and Florent Sinama-Pongolle on the substitutes' bench.

    Jose Mourinho replaced Hernan Crespo with Didier Drogba as his only change from the side that beat Aston Villa at the weekend, and the Premiership champions started pinged the ball around with ease in the early stages.

    Alonso was booked for grabbing Michael Essien and Frank Lampard blasted the free-kick wide from 20 yards with Liverpool barely able to get out of their half at this point.

    But they grew in confidence and Lampard should have been booked for a foul on Gerrard as the game ignited.

    Gerrard, who almost moved to Chelsea despite leading Liverpool to glory in last season's final in Istanbul, had the best chance of the opening half when he fired over from the edge of the box after good work by Traore. The Liverpool skipper had more time than he realised.

    By now the tackles were flying in and worries about having an Italian referee in charge of a very English occasion became evident. He missed some incidents, got others wrong and managed to upset both benches.

    Claude Makelele was booked for another foul on Gerrard as Liverpool pushed forward in support of Peter Crouch. A string of corners failed to rattle a superbly defiant Chelsea defence and the Londoners started to take a measure of control.

    When Chelsea were beaten in last season's semi-final second leg at Anfield, they were denied the width of Arjen Robben and Damien Duff.

    But not this time. Both found space to terrify Liverpool with their pace and although Alonso coolly halted a Robben run with a fine tackle and then a dummy before clearing, the danger of the Dutchman was obvious seconds later when he left Sami Hyypia floundering and produced the best save of the first half when Jose Reina tipped over a rising drive.

    The intensity continued after the break; Luis Garcia claimed he was hauled back by Paulo Ferreira as he raced into the box onto a Crouch flick, while the muscular presence of Essien continued to drive Chelsea forward, with Drogba heading over from six yards.

    Then Jamie Carragher's header looked to strike Gallas on the arm but Liverpool were refused what looked like an excellent shout for a penalty.

    De Santis did not improve and he missed John Terry's body check on Gerrard but booked Robben for dissent. Lampard was next to be cautioned for flattening Cisse.

    Liverpool were at Chelsea's throats now, but still could not make the breakthrough.

    Shaun Wright-Phillips replaced Robben just after the hour mark as the visitors sought to relieve some of the pressure.

    A mix-up between Carragher and Hyypia almost let in Duff, but Reina produced a desperate save. Hernan Crespo soon replaced the Irish winger and, for the home side, Cisse was replaced by Florent Sinama-Pongolle.

    By now it was anybody's game. Chelsea had all their attacking options on the pitch and Liverpool continued to strive for the goal their second-half display deserved.

    Terry was booked for a foul on Alonso with a minute left and defender Robert Huth replaced Drogba, but Chelsea hung on for a draw.

    • Benitez slams referee

    Rafael Benitez described as 'unbelievable the decision not to award his side a second half penalty in their Champions League clash with Chelsea.

    The crucial moment came when William Gallas looked to handle a Jamie Carragher header as Liverpool laid siege to the Chelsea goal in what was eventually a 0-0 draw in their Group G meeting.

    Liverpool manager Benitez also claimed there was another potential spot-kick when Luis Garcia was tugged back by Paulo Ferreira.

    For Liverpool it brought back memories of an incident in the league match between the clubs at Anfield last season when Tiago got away with another handball in the Chelsea box.

    Benitez dismissed Chelsea's long-running claims that Luis Garcia's match-winner in the semi-finals of the competition last season was not over the line, saying: 'In this game we did not have the linesman. It could have been a penalty and a red card, sometimes people forget these details.

    'And as for this occasion, I have seen it on TV, it was clear, unbelievable. The key is that when you play against big teams the small details are crucial. But that was a very big detail.

    Carragher was also highly critical after the game of the decision not to award Liverpool that penalty.

    Benitez said: 'I felt it was a good game, we played with a high tempo and tried to win. I am pleased with a point against a good team like Chelsea, but we really lost two points because we played better than them.

    'It is good we now have four points, but maybe it should be six. I think we showed the audience we could play well, it was important for us that we showed we could play well in big games like this.

    'There was one, maybe two, penalties we should have had. The most important thing was that we showed that in one game we can be better than Chelsea, and I felt we were just that.

    Chelsea boss Jose Mourinho insisted he was not happy with the draw, saying: 'I am not 100% satisfied, more disappointed. I am not crazy with happiness nor am I sick either.

    'An away point in Champions League is a positive result and I do not think anyone deserved to win, a draw is a fair result.

    'It was competitive and the result was very close.

    'But there was no space to play in midfield, there was a lot of power there, (Steven) Gerrard, (Dietmar) Hamann and (Xabi) Alonso. And we had (Frank) Lampard, (Claude) Makelele and (Michael) Essien so we had power too. There was no space to create situations.

    And, with Chelsea criticised this season for their long ball game, Mourinho attempted to shift the spotlight onto Benitez's side who again employed Peter Crouch as a target man.

    He said: 'We played 4-3-3, like we do always, in the last 30 minutes we played (Hernan) Crespo and (Didier) Drogba together to make use of Drogba's dominance, because he played very well. It could have given us three points.

    'A good game? It depends on your criteria, what you love in football. Everyone has a choice.

    'They use Crouch, some people like him some don't like him. Some people criticise direct play and others love it.

    'But we don't have to like or dislike, we have to cope with it. Terry and Carvalho coped very well with it. Liverpool didn't create much danger playing their style.

    Either Chelsea are too lucky or they bribe. ######ing cheaters. :o

  9. Jose Mourinho insisted Chelsea should not be unduly worried by memories of their Champions League semi-final defeat by Liverpool ahead of this week's group stage rematch - as they won at Anfield in the league last season.

    Chelsea suffered their lowest point of last season when Luis Garcia's hotly-disputed goal at Anfield knocked them out of the Champions League.

    However, as well as defeating Liverpool at Stamford Bridge in the Premiership and in the Carling Cup final in Cardiff, the Blues also secured a draw in the first leg of the European semi-final.

    More importantly for morale ahead of Wednesday's tie, however, they won 1-0 at Anfield in the Premier League on New Year's Day, with Joe Cole striking the winner with 10 minutes left.

    Mourinho declared: 'In April we lost but in January we won. So we know that we can win there, although we also know we can lose there. They are enjoyable matches. These big matches you enjoy more.'

    The Chelsea boss, whose side also face Liverpool away in the Premiership next weekend, is not short of confidence after the Blues secured their seventh consecutive league win against Aston Villa.

    That has left them 11 points ahead of Arsenal and 10 points ahead of Manchester United, having played just one game more than their two leading rivals.

    'If you know that they lost points then it's good because the distance is bigger in this moment. If we make a mistake and lose a game we have a distance,' observed the Chelsea boss.

    Mourinho admitted he cannot keep his entire squad happy, given the huge competition for places at Stamford Bridge, with the likes of Joe Cole, Robert Huth, Geremi, Glen Johnson and Carlton Cole having featured little this season.

    'I can't keep them all happy,' he told BBC1's Match of the Day. 'Last season Geremi was a little bit unhappy because he was on the bench. This time, I gave a chance to Glen Johnson and Geremi was disappointed. This is just one example. I can give you dozens of examples. I can't do it.'

    Mourinho must instead rely on Chelsea's squad morale and their pursuit of trophies on four fronts to keep his players content, although there could be at least one opening in his side at Anfield.

    Arjen Robben's fitness must be checked after limping off against Villa, while Mourinho must also decide whether Asier del Horno is ready for a comeback.

    Frank Lampard, whose brace helped Chelsea to the 2-1 win over Villa, declared: 'We are ready for Liverpool but they will be two very tough games, we know that. Going to Anfield is always difficult and going there twice in a week even more so.

    'We look ready for it and we want to get the right results. It was a deafening noise last season and it will be the same this week so we will have to be ready.'

    So what do u think? Will Pool beat up Chelscum?

  10. With results like this weekend, how can it be boring.

    ManU 1-Blackburn 2

    Midd 0-Sland 2

    Wham 0-Arsenal 0

    B'ham2-Lpool 2

    Villa gave Chelsea a game to remember. What more do you want.

    Of course the knockers are not going to worry about that in Chelsea( or Chelski's as the jelous minority label them)case. If Chelsea win they're going to say 'Look what you can do with money' if they lose, the same people are going to say' Money can't even buy them success'

        The funny thing is, most of the whingers support the team that sports the two most expensive players in the premiership, the team that over the last 12 years has spent more money than Chelsea, the team that is now owned by an American billionair. No mate, the Premiership still holds all the charm and skill that is not seen in other countries. And will do long after the Chelsea dogs have had their day and another team finds a manager that spends his sponsors money wisely.

    Agreed! EPL rocks! :o

×
×
  • Create New...