Eric Loh

3 minutes ago, sfokevin said:

Everyone need to at least watch this C-Span clip

 

 

The beauty of the spontaneous applause was it drowned out the desperate Reps trying to insert their last words or probably rites. 

11 hours ago, webfact said:

U.S. and China 'getting close' to trade deal -

Has the fat man sung? 

3 minutes ago, WalkingOrders said:

Sure, it's all coming there gonna get him one day, and the Democrats are on the right path for sure. ???? That can be impeachment try number 3. ???? Time ticks. Barr is coming! Oh but hey, it's got plenty of bi-partisan support just like past impeachment attempts. Right? 75 votes in the Senate No worries ???? Let's wait and see, oh and one more time Barr is coming!

Tax fraud will most probably get him like Al Capone. 

46 minutes ago, WalkingOrders said:

Haha. Mueller gave the most convoluted gobbledygook I ever heard for his reasoning. You could see the pain on his own face while he said it. He turned out to be nothing more then an old man who was a front for Democrat operative prosecutors who tried their best with no case available to them to prosecute. Mueller looked ashamed....of course who knows, but he oughta be ashamed!

Haha indeed. Muller may have the last laugh. They are criminal acts that will indict citizen Trump in the Muller investigation. That is if the tax dodge,  campaign funds violation among many charges and those still under investigation waiting for him. 
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/06/06/how-trump-could-be-prosecuted-after-the-white-house-227050

2 minutes ago, WalkingOrders said:

No problem the case in China. Easier said then done

https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/443637-peter-schweizer-hunter-biden-needs-to-testify-on-ukraine-china-business

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/analysis-hunter-biden-tied-to-china-firm-with-questionable-dealings I could go on, despite the CNN MSNBC bs none can dispute the facts. They only talk around them.

Mate that was a talking point. Like your personal opinion. Show me the case. Have they been charged in China. Same as the Burisma talking point. Have the State Dept, FBI or DOJ charged the Bidens. Quick answer is no as there are simply no evidence. Talking points and self interest opinions are dime a dozen here. 

10 minutes ago, WalkingOrders said:

  In China, the case with Biden is even far more uglier

Walk the talk. Show us the case in China. Your fictional opinion as disclaimer should be inclusive. 

1 minute ago, BobBKK said:

Me too but win he will due to the Dems strategy - people, generally, hate obvious bias and hypocrisy.  

Agree. It’s for the Dems to lose not because of bias and hypocrisy ( plenty in the Reps camp) but poor strategic planning and too timid to face down Trump. 

13 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

We can't take anything for granted. He'll still have an advantage in terms of the electoral college regardless.

That’s right. It is like Prayut having that advantage to be PM with help from the constitution and election laws. Bottom line undeserving, 

18 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Indeed. Wonder what the haters will do when Trump wins another 4 years? Will we have another 4 years of continual whining from Schiff and Nancy?

If he win another 4 years, I will feel sorry for America and the rest of the world and I would say the global climate and environment too. Big if but if public sentiment for his impeachment, polls and the massive funds generated by the Dems are to go by, he probably will lose. The world will be a better place without him. Mother Nature will sigh a relief too. 

22 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

When you cannot use reason, logic, evidence or facts to support your arguments then attack the source.  Is that your strategy, Eric?  If it is, it's feeble.

 

Also, the link I provided is to actual documentation.  No story lines, no narrative, simply hard, cold facts.  John Solomon uploaded them.  Are you suggesting that he made these documents up?

No I don’t think he make up the documents but I think he was trying to throw up controversy and hope something stick and someone or some agencies like the State Department or DOJ will react. So far, nothing not even a feeble rustling of interest from these investigative agencies. 

4 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

Ask and you shall receive, Jingthing.  I'm sure you were hoping I was just bluffing.

 

https://www.scribd.com/user/259237201/JohnSolomon

John Solomon well known and accused of magnifying small scandals and creating fake controversy. Disappointed with you for not providing any information from Alex Jones. 

8 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

But I thought there was no evidence of Biden corruption?  You guys have been swearing to it for over a month.  Why, you guys would even link to MSM pieces that called it a conspiracy theory.  Don't tell me you guys are giving up on the "no evidence" claim so easily.

Affirmative no evidence there were corruption. Ukraine top prosecutor said so. Your allegation is a nothing burger but credit you for trying to pull a John Kennedy stunt. 

2 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

What's this?  Leaked bank documents from the Ukrainian General Prosecutor’s office showing complex money transfers?  Involving AS PrivatBank in Latvia?  Funneled through Busima Holding Limited (Cyprus)?  A slush fund owned and operated by Devon Archer, John Kerry Senior, John Kerry Junior, Heinz Jr, and Hunter Biden?

 

Say it ain't so, Joe!

 

Oh, and documents implicating Joe Biden, George Soros, Hillary Clinton and Joseph Misfud's collusion and possible criminal activity in Ukraine?

 

Is undeniable truth being exposed?  Heads will explode!

 

(One of many, many documents released.)

 

 

 

 

All peaceful on the western front. Don’t get yourself into a fit. If there are any truth to your allegations, Trump’s surrogate AG Barr will be all over it. 

5 minutes ago, heybruce said:

"Trump has claimed he released the aid on September 11. But five sources told Bloomberg that $141 million of the money was actually authorized to be released several days earlier after lawyers determined that the White House Office of Management and Budget and, therefore, the president, had no legal standing to block the funds."   https://www.aol.com/article/news/2019/11/10/ukraine-aid-was-released-after-federal-lawyers-said-trump-freeze-was-illegal-report/23857555/

Trump didn’t authorized the release of fund period.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/report-state-dept-quietly-released-ukraine-aid-at-boltons-orders

9 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

Any excuse for Reuters to use the term"bromance" I guess. Reuters is such a vile despicable news org.

Reuter’s should reserved the term bromance to the Trump-Kim relation. He did declared that he fell in love with Kim and have been exchanging beautiful letters. ???? 

10 minutes ago, Nigel Garvie said:

Point of order only:- The US was already involved in Syria before ISIS rose to power. They (Including UK and France etc) were supporting a ragbag group of Sunni terror groups - many believe at Saudi Arabia's request. Remember the pathetic attempts to establish the "Moderate opposition" at $1m per soldier.

 

If your friend/child/relation was killed in 9/11 (Or 7/7 UK) you might wonder why your government was supporting Al Qaeda in Syria (Later to become Al Nusrah). 

 

Otherwise I agree with your points.

Respectfully US designate Al Nusrah as a terrorist organization and State Department categorically denied arming them and Treasury sanctioned and targeted their financial structure. They cut ties with Al-Qaeda in ‘16. I am no expert and this is totally off topic. Have a good day.  

2 hours ago, TopDeadSenter said:

I disagree. It was an easy way to show the dems are just fine with the concept of "quid pro quo" as it pertains to foreign policy and aid so long as it themselves doing it. Others can not use that method. They will be impeached.

 

An apples and oranges out of context approach could be used to highlight the sheer hypocrisy (and sillyness)of the situation. For ex Trumps predecessor invaded Libya and Syria on suspicious premises and caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people and civil strife, slavery and violence that continues to this day. Nobody batted an eyelid and he got the nobel award. Trump has a phone call with another world leader and asks him to look into corruption and it's the end of the world, meltdown and temper tantrum the likes of which have never been seen before. Certainly makes you wonder.....

 

You really got to provide better examples if you want to be taken seriously.

Libya military intervention was to implement UN Security Council Resolution to stop crimes against humanity. US intervention was part of NATO allies involvement. 
 

Syria intervention was again a coalition involvement against ISIL.

Meanwhile Trump’s phone call was a personal effort to get dirt on the Bidens. If corruption was what he after, he should asked for an investigation of Rick Perry and his shady deal with Zelensky to get his energy buddies the oil and gas project. Their bids were lower than others but they still clinched the project. 

3 hours ago, Baerboxer said:

 

Yes.

 

But I don't want to see some bitter old corrupt hag from America openly interfering in British Politics whilst whining on about how wrong it is to interfere in American politics.

 

Hypocrisy of the left, as usual. Always "do as we say, not as we do". 

Going by your argument, Boris Johnson shouldn’t comment that he side with the protestors in Hong Kong and shouldn’t even talk to them.