
sambum
-
Posts
9,525 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Posts posted by sambum
-
-
1 hour ago, PopGun said:
He would have no problem getting into Britain without a passport.
There are thousands of undocumented men entering the country every week.
Well said!
-
Facing a 21 year sentence and out on bail - will probably do a "Boss"!
-
1
-
-
15 hours ago, geisha said:
Of course it’s not free? Who do you think pay for everything, Santa Klaus ?
No wonder your post went into my "Junk" folder with that kind of pedantic attitude!
"The NHS in England is mainly funded by general taxation and National Insurance. A small part comes from patient charges, such as for prescriptions and dentistry."
My point, as you (should) well know, is that if you get treated for a sprained ankle or a heart attack in an NHS Hospital in the UK - you will NOT have to pay for the treatment, and by the way that includes immigrants - legal or illegal.
-
"The Yoovidhya family, co-owners of Red Bull, have clinched the top spot as Thailand’s richest. Their immense net worth soared, highlighting the country's ever-evolving wealth landscape."
Hence "Boss" is still "on the run" from the law!
-
2 hours ago, wensiensheng said:
“We here in the UK “
Says it all. You’re reliant on a cash strapped antiquated medical system that U.K. people complain about in spades, but also claim it to be the envy of the world.
In Thailand there’s no problem actually seeing a doctor. Or dentist for that matter. The standard varies dramatically depending on where you seek treatment.
For the record, I don’t envy the U.K. NHS at all. It’s crap.
The point about the NHS is the treatment is free - dependent on the urgency of the situation, you may have to wait a while.
In Thailand, I agree that you can get seen by a doctor very quickly, but any subsequent treatment can be very expensive!
-
1
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
The Ministry of Public Health is in the final stages of revising the Alcohol Control Act 2008. Minister Somsak Thepsutin announced that the House’s recent approval of the bill is part of efforts to liberalise a market expected to boost tourism and support smaller breweries.
"The Ministry will also manage further actions, including announcements about alcohol sales onboard trains and in designated areas....."
"Meanwhile, the Prime Minister will officially announce alcohol sales at Bangkok's Hua Lamphong railway station, taking into account the station's appropriate safety measures.
However, we will continue to ban alcohol sales at other stations and aboard trains."
So just how does banning alcohol aboard on trains and stations boost tourism? When the reason they banned it in the first place was because of the horrendous actions of one of their own (unvetted) staff by raping a young girl and killing her by throwing her off the train?
-
2
-
1
-
Lawyer Wirasak Nakin noted the family has petitioned the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) over the body's movement, deemed unnatural.
I would have thought that any dead body moving would be "unnatural"?
-
1
-
-
Nice to see "Security" taking such an active role!!!
-
9 hours ago, kiwikeith said:
Lunch from 11am to 2pm you would be fissed on the job when you get back to work
Going back to work at 2pm because after that you can't buy any more booze? If it's the workers getting "fissed" that they're worried about, one would thaink that they would ban booze between 11 am and 2 pm? 🙂
-
2
-
-
28 minutes ago, cjinchiangrai said:
My recollection is that there is an exception for commercial trade where you could buy a whole box. 3k for a box of whiskey is a bit dear but 650 for a box of beer is certainly easily handled. Then again, the lao khao vendors are open 24-7. Out here in the sticks, nobody pays attention. the only losers are Big-C and 7-11.
Add Macro and Tesco Lotus to that list!
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
On 6/27/2025 at 4:50 PM, redwood1 said:The 2-5PM sales ban is almost sacred now ...Its always defended by officials, Yet no one can really explain why it exists...Strange...
One of the reasons given is that it was to stop schoolkids buying booze!
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Effective June 27, sales will only be allowed during specific hours: from 11am to 2pm, and from 5pm to midnight. This applies throughout the country,................."
I thought those were the rules already for this 3rd World country trying to attract tourists as the figures (according to TAT!!!) have shown a significant drop?
-
1
-
-
What on earth has the headline pic (The interior of a car!) got to do with the story?
-
2 hours ago, Cabradelmar said:
Yes, it's a nickname for Bang Kwang Central Prison
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, StayinThailand2much said:
Yes, and, strangely, these factors are hardly ever mentioned as reasons for declining tourist numbers. Instead it's 'kidnappings', 'poor economic conditions in other countries', or 'border disputes'... If they cannot even acknowledge decade-old scams, ever changing visa policies, etc., as reasons for stagnating tourism income, how can they ever solve this?
By being honest! 🤣
-
"Thailand's tourism sector is reeling as foreign visitor numbers slide. From January 1 to June 22, there was a 4.24% drop in arrivals compared to the same time last year, revealed by the Ministry of Tourism and Sports."
Must be breaking TAT's heart having to show a DROP in numbers!
-
I wonder how many "new" probes and consequent "meetings" will be held before this affair finally gets "put to bed"?
-
35 minutes ago, Magictoad said:
Rohypnol is seen in the newspaper reports of rapes and attacks on people.
True, but this post is about Cannabis Infused sweets and jellies - why not bring in LSD , Cocaine, Meth Amphtamine, and all other "hypnotic" drugs while you're at it?
-
1
-
-
"Anticipating future political shifts, Thaksin is reportedly orchestrating a new cabinet composition. This reshuffle would see the ultra-conservative Ruam Thai Sang Chart rise to the second-largest coalition spot after Pheu Thai, replacing Bhumjaithai, who left the government coalition."
I thought that part of the agreement regarding his return was that he stayed out of politics - Hmmm?
-
9 hours ago, newnative said:
I wonder if your Thai wife's friend had her eye procedure done at a public hospital--which, of course, would be cheaper than a private hospital such as what you used, and result in two different prices. Also, to start with, her standard lens likely cost far less than your special type of lens. My Thai spouse and I both had lasik done at a private hospital and we were both charged the same price.
About 12 years after our lasik, we both had lens replcement, Supersight, done. Same private hospital. Mine cost slightly more but that was only because I required a different, more expensive lens, not because I was a farang and my partner Thai. The service was quick and easy, both of us done in one day, with both eyes done for each of us.
Contrast that to my partner's Thai sister. She also wanted lens replacement but, to save money, she used her public hospital. When we saw her, she had had one eye done but was waiting to have the second one done because the public hospital had run out of the type of replacement lens she needed. Months later, she was still waiting. I think she has now had the second eye finally done.
So, in this example, two different prices, for two levels of medical care, reflecting the use of a private hospital over a less expensive public one. Frankly, I don't have a problem with Thai citizens paying less at both public and private hospitals--or parks, museums, monuments, etc., etc.
You are quite right in your assumptions in that she had hers done at a Public Hospital whereas I opted to go to a Private Hospital. However, I got a quote from the Public Hospital where she was treated, and for the cataract removal and basic lens fitted they were going to charge me app 40,000 baht, whereas she paid 6,000 baht! I don't mind paying slightly more, but almost SEVEN times as much is a BIG price differential!!!
(I opted to go to a Private Hospital because (a) A couple of farang friends had been there and recommended it highly, and (b) the Public Hospital did not stock the type of lens that I required.)
Regarding your point re "parks, museums, monuments, etc., etc.", I wonder how Thais would feel if, for instance, they had to pay £50 to visit London Zoo, whereas the locals only had to pay £10? (Figures for illustration points only!)
-
2 hours ago, Espanol said:
Concerns?
We're just happy.
I wish the Indians would disappear too and Thailand would be a nice place again, especially Pattaya.Nice place? Pattaya? Again?
Ah, the "FAMILY FRIENDLY RESORT"!
-
2
-
-
"Yuttasak Supasorn, former Governor of the Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT), has outlined six key
reasonsexcuses behind this trend:" -
2 hours ago, captain_shane said:
You live in a scam area then. I got a toe nail removed at the hospital here and it cost 200 baht.
Good price! I live in a tourist area and that was at the most expensive hospital on the island. They were going to charge me "up to 500,000 baht" for a spinal operation because I had a very sore shoulder! Cleared itself after a couple of days and my local clinic doc reckoned it was probably a trapped nerve!
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, unblocktheplanet said:
THB 50 extra. I just can't afford to get sick!
I would like to know where you get the 50 baht from!
At one of our local hospitals they were going to charge a "farang" 19,000 baht for ONE stitch in a cut finger!!!
-
1
-
British Man Faces 21-Year Sentence for Human Trafficking
in Pattaya News
Posted
It does if they're thought to be a flight risk!