Jump to content

davemos

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    510
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by davemos

  1. 6 hours ago, asiacurious said:

     

    A link would have been nice.  Really, it isn't hard to do!  https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.05.18.21257385v1 

     

    I looked through the non-peer reviewed pre-print study and I'll wager it never gets published.  It's riddled with problems.

     

    One of the big ones is that it completely ignores any analysis of population density on mask mandates.  The only thing it does say about density is this:

     

     

    Another issue is that the pre-print study you cite says this:

     

     

    Well I looked up that footnoted study (HTML / PDF) and it actually says the opposite of what the authors of your cited study claim it says.... (emphasis added) 

     

     

    This kind of egregious error (unintentional or not) should make people very weary of the quality of the pre-printed study you brought to the conversation.

     

    Finally, the study that I link to provides the following data about mask mandates and dine-in eating at restaurants, a variable can have huge impact on the data that your study completely ignores.  This table nicely summarizes the data:

     

    image.thumb.png.6eafc82642049670d7b70712db682e5b.png

     

     

     

     

    Time line old <deleted> from you .Tuesday update 

     

  2. New findings reported Tuesday in a University of Louisville study challenge what has been the prevailing belief that mask mandates are necessary to slow the spread of the Wuhan coronavirus. The study notes that "80% of US states mandated masks during the COVID-19 pandemic" and while "mandates induced greater mask compliance, [they] did not predict lower growth rates when community spread was low (minima) or high (maxima)." Among other things, the study—conducted using data from the CDC covering multiple seasons—reports that "mask mandates and use are not associated with lower SARS-CoV-2 spread among US states."

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...