ThailandRyan

34 minutes ago, earlinclaifornia said:

He already said he won't testify at the trial. Wait and see. 

News late today in the US says he has no plans ro testify but will testify if called as a witness.

https://abcnews-go-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/pence-plans-testify-trumps-jan-6-trial-comply/story?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&id=102056198&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From %1%24s&aoh=16913689241120&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fabcnews.go.com%2Famp%2FPolitics%2Fpence-plans-testify-trumps-jan-6-trial-comply%2Fstory%3Fid%3D102056198%23amp_tf%3DFrom%20%251%24s%26aoh%3D16913689241120%26referrer%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com

12 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

"The DOJ is not going to make accusations without facts/evidence to back them up". 

Hahahahahahaha.....!    It's got a bloody history of doing just that!

Enlighten us Lou. Please tell us about indictments made without facts or evidence to back them up.

2 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

You need to get out a bit more, then.   How could you know what areas of the indictment will be confirmed to be "facts"?

If they were not facts in evidence Sir then the grand jury would never have heard them.  The facts in evidence are well supported and up to the defense to try and punch holes in and ergo as you say are accusations which are supported and not unsupported.  Please know the difference between the two

15 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Bob doesn't seem all that happy with his educated wealthy respectable Thai woman (according to previous posts).

Maybe it's time for him to try a bar girl?

Yet he did if you remember.  He stole the bargirl from an old foreigner who was sleeping and took her on a trip with him.  I am highly skeptical of anything posted by Bob or as he was known for awhile Bogs, as his stories are all just that stories and seem to be wind-ups but whatever, if people want to believe him then more power to him.

7 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Wouldn't they then have to arrest election denier Stacey Abrams too? Or has America now openyly got 2 sets of laws, one for conservatives and another for the left.

 I love how the left try(and fail) to state why their own election deniers are good, while GOP members that want to make sure results are on the up and up are "insurrectionists". So hypocritical 

Did Stacey Abrams create fake electors, try and stop Pence, or incite folks to "Fight like Hell" Your still in the weeds.  And this is not a witch hunt, or election interference, your hero DT violated the law and is now being held accountable.  Tell me and us here on AN how Stacey Abrams violated the law with being a vocal election denier?

10 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

He incited people to make their voices heard "peacefully and patriotically". 

Peacefully, so Jan 6th was peaceful? He also tried to intimidate election workers as well, or is that all fake.  As far as Pence goes he tried to have him stop a ceremonial procedure to close out the election as far as the EC was concerned, or did that not happen?  Did he not also employ a tactic to have Fake electors installed?  Your off in the weeds, looking for your golf ball right about now, but if you were trump it would mysteriously drop from a tree and onto the green or fairway........stop being so naïve.

2 hours ago, earlinclaifornia said:

American Heros when USA needed it most. 

Who stood up for the rule of law and what was right and did not cave. 

10 minutes ago, riclag said:

This is the highwater mark for , the ultimate scam perpetrated on the electorate! The coordinated effort to delegitimize a elected President , using msm and former intel agencies officials !

This is why many will always have Trumps back and why his  numbers continue growing!imop

 

Thats funny.  What the issue is really about is that they and others, much like you and the poster you quoted, never look at the rule of law and apply it evenly and fairly to all involved.  As a now retired CEO of my own investigations company after a life as a LEO, if one of my employees did something wrong or the company was led astray under my watch, than I as the head of the company would be responsible.  If as a LEO Manager if something happened under my watch and I never did anything to stop it, and even if I was not involved, then I would be culpable as well.  You folks just can not see that.  As the now former POTUS has done, and did, and is still doing, he is inciting folks to do his bidding, that is not Free Speech.

It appears that from recent statements by the infamous MTG she will be trying to institute the Holman rule - Wikipedia in order to shut down Jack Smith.

Its funny that the Trump Supporters and MAGA crowd have also latched onto the "They had 2 1/2 years to prosecute Trump, why wait until now, oh its because of the Biden crime family and its election interference"  How many times must folks be told that it takes time to build a case, gather the evidence, interview witnesses and then determine if charges are appropriate.  Two and a half years ago the date would have been February 2020, and just right after the Jan 6th debacle.  How could prosecutors have built a case in just under a month.  Many of those interviewed were just done this year as more and more information was obtained about there involvements.  Yet the MAGA faithful believe what Trump spouts, and had he been charged in 2020 or 2021 they would have had the same rhetoric with "Pelosi is leading this witch hunt".  

The rule of law is the rule of law, and it does not matter who you are, commit a crime or crimes and after and investigation is done and completed it will go to court, cases take time to assemble and if you rush them then they fall apart and you, as the defendant, walk free when you were guilty and false prosecution statements are made, 

2 hours ago, James Roderick said:

Are you really saying that it wasn't Hunter Biden's laptop, and all that incriminating information was fake ??  

Yet you still believe a story which still has never been fully investigated nor investigated.....why do you think that is, and don't go into the rabbit hole with conspiracy drivel.  If the evidence was there and was clear then the story would have grown legs......

4 hours ago, James Roderick said:

The last election wasn't that fair. If the media had reported on Hunter Biden's laptop then Trump would have certainly won. Instead the media, and particularly social media actively suppressed most stories damaging to Biden , and withheld those benefiting Trump - that was hardly fair.  

 

Was Hunter running for President?  It would not have mattered one Iota.

35 minutes ago, observer90210 said:

To make a sort of update on the issue it seems that this visa is subject to prior formalités with the thai BOI and if approved, one can only then file for the LTR.

 

Second, it seems that this visa says 10 years but that seems actually a 5 year visa that is granted and once expired, it can be extended  for 5 more years, hence the 10 year mention.

 

So technically speaking the LTR seems actually an extendable 5 yr visa ?

 

Please correct me as I am surely missing out a lot here.

It is a 10 year visa which is broken into two 5 year segments.  Near the end of the 5th year the LTR holder will need to provide the BOI with the same type of paperwork provided when they were first approved to verify they still comply with the regulations.  After that is done and they are then re-approved the second 5 year permission to stay will be stamped into the Passports.  The 10 years was paid up front and no further fees are due at the end of the 5th year. 10 years for 50k Thb 

The terrible news for Trump is that his spectacle seems to be reverberating amongst Federal Judges, even retired ones, who feel the need to admonish Trump.

A conservative former federal judge said Trump 'has cynically chosen to inflict this embarrassing spectacle on the Nation' following his indictment (msn.com)

A conservative former federal judge admonished former President Donald Trump on Twitter after a new federal indictment was unsealed against him on Tuesday.

Former Judge J. Michael Luttig said it's both "tragic and regrettable" that Trump chose to "inflict this embarrassing spectacle on the nation."

Luttig previously acted as an informal adviser to Vice President Mike Pence.

Well they need to wait until there is a cabinet.  This appears to be putting the cart before the horse.....

1 hour ago, CharlieKo said:

That isn't democracy, no matter how you try to make it seem so. The case is the Democrats against Trump.

You better come out from the dark cave in the basement your in and look at the true facts.  Facts which are not of the Dem's making.  Is the indictment fictitious to you, or do you believe Donnies call to head to the Capital on January 6th because it will be "Wild" never happened, and he never asked someone to find him votes or make fake electors.........Your oblivious to the reality of things.  Your acting like a kid caught on film stealing from the cookie jar and then denying it ever happened.