candide

BARR: “To me, it’s amazing that you read through the indictment and his behavior in that indictment. And it’s nauseating, it’s despicable behavior. “Whether it’s criminal or not, someone who engaged in that kind of bullying about a process that is fundamental to our system and to our self-government shouldn’t be anywhere near the Oval Office. And for him to be attacking a prosecutor who is investigating that with all the epithets, and so forth, which he has no basis for, as far as I can tell, is ridiculous. https://edition.cnn.com/2023/08/03/politics/bill-barr-trump-what-matters/index.html

More embarassing spectacle! ???? "I feel badly for Mike Pence, who is attracting no crowds, enthusiasm, or loyalty from people who, as a member of the Trump Administration, should be loving him," Trump wrote. "He didn’t fight against Election Fraud, which we will now be easily able to prove based on the most recent Fake Indictment & information which will have to be made available to us, finally ― a really BIG deal. The V.P. had power that Mike didn’t understand, but after the Election, the RINOS & Dems changed the law, taking that power away!" https://news.yahoo.com/donald-trump-fires-back-mike-222643958.html

Which recession? Apart from Germany. The Eurozone growth rate is higher than Brexited UK. One question (a real one). How is the Brexit project not globalist? Global Britain, web of free-trade deals, Singapore-on-Thames, a global financial market hub, less regulation, lower worker protections, etc... Is that not globalist?

Which crime?

Tu quoque Jared mi!

It seems to be quite a reasonable forecast for 2023, considering that production during the first months of 2023 was already above the 12.4 level: 12,568; 12,532; 12,770; 12,677; 12,662 https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=MCRFPUS2&f=M

A MAGA fan calling others "sheep". That's rich!

21 Donald Trump election lies listed in his new indictment https://edition.cnn.com/2023/08/02/politics/trump-indictment-lies/index.html "Even in listing 21 lies, the 45-page indictment does not come close to capturing the entirety of Trump’s massive catalogue of false claims about the election. But the list is illustrative nonetheless – highlighting the breadth of election-related topics Trump was dishonest about, the large number of states his election dishonesty spanned, and, critically, his willingness to persist in privately and publicly making dishonest assertions even after they had been debunked to him directly."

Nah... the Aryan Brotherhood will protect him! ????

Well, when his sister was elected, elections were organised under the Abhisit government by an EC appointed after the coup. I doubt they had a pro-Thaksin bias.

Highest post-pandemic growth among G7 countries, lowest current inflation rate among G7 countries, record low unemployment, record oil and gas production and exports, etc.... So boring, indeed!

How does it compare with U.K? ???? https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn02784/

The article was examining claims from an image diffused in social media. One half was true and one half false. To start with, you forgot to mention what was the question in the title of the article. It was: "When Joe Biden’s son Hunter was serving as "a director to Ukraine’s largest private gas producer," the elder Biden "threatened to withhold $1 BILLION in U.S. aid to Ukraine if they didn’t fire a prosecutor looking into" the gas company." No one denies that Hunter was working for Burisma when Joe threatened to fire Shokin. That was the half of the social media post examined which was true. There is also something else written in the article (quote below): "We found no evidence to support the idea that Joe Biden advocated with his son's interests in mind, as the message suggests. It's not even clear that the company was actively under investigation or that a change in prosecutors benefited it." That was the other half of the social media post examined which was false.

March 19, 2023, 6:22 PM CET

Posting the same unproven claims over and over will not make it true. You continuously evoked the article to justify your claims, but you are unable to quote the allegedly relevant part of the article. Could it be that you are trolling?

Let's forget about the troll and analyse the indictment... "Former Vice President Mike Pence's notes were mentioned in the charging document of former President Donald Trump that came down Tuesday. The notes were taken during a meeting with the former president sometime before the Jan. 6 riot. Pence's notes allegedly detailed what Trump said about election fraud and how he planned to challenge the election." Donald Trump indicted: Mike Pence's notes referenced in charging document https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/courts/mike-pences-notes-referenced-charging-document

What do you have, apart from vague allegations, based on cherry-picking parts of the testimony (around 20 calls during 10 years), and ignoring the other parts (they never talked business, Hunter was giving the "illusion", etc...)? It's all "don't you think" etc...

So, in brief, you still have nothing!

About which crime?

Just curious. Where did you read it?

So the occurrence rate is 0,0054794521! ????

JUST IN: Grand jury investigating 2020 election interference hands up indictment https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-2020-election-probe-08-01-23/index.html

That's their usual trick. They are also holding back the FBI agent's testimony which contradicts their darling whistleblowers. Well, apparently, it seems some people fall for it.

Comer says! ???? When will the GOP release the testimony so that we can know what has been exactly said?

I know but there are sources I prefer not to evoked. BTW, do they contradict what I mentioned?