candide

Of course he's a family man! Here's the proof: he employed his family at the WH! 😀

You're expecting him to substantiate his claims are you? 😀

He's not telling lies he's telling B.S.! Congratulations, That's a good one! 😆 Note that the two are not exclusive, he can be both a liar and tell B.S., like when he claimed the 2020 election has been rigged by massive fraud.

Of course, It's not true.

I know it. It's me who posted that link before. If you read it, you will find that it shows It's not a real election, and also that it uses both election and selection to qualify the process. it also shows It's organised by the EC and that the government does not select Senators. Finally, it concludes: "What the constitutional drafters envisioned as an election among an exclusive club of the nonpartisan experts will turn out to be an election for the elderly, wealthy, and well-connected few."

You are contradicting yourself. You claimed that the MSM presented Schiff parody as it were the original transcript in order to fool people ("it was spread far & wide by all the bought out MSM, implying it was what was actually said"). But you have yourself provided two links from the "bought out MSM" showing that they did not do that, and actually provided a critical analysis of Schiff speach to their readers.

It's incoherent. On the one hand you are claiming that his wealth is unexplained (amount known from his tax return), and on the other hand you are claiming there have been hidden payments. If there had been hidden payments (of which you have no proof), the wealth brought by these payment would not show in his official wealth amount. And anyway, your claim of payments from China or Ukraine is baseless. But if you have some proof, send it to Comer, He's desperate as he cannot find any. FD-1023 anyone? In summary, you have nothing.

I doubt that was part of the mission given to him....

Not true. The MSM published the original transcript from the WH, as Politico did. Which misinformation did Schiff spread, exactly? https://www.politifact.com/article/2019/sep/30/context-adam-schiffs-dramatized-version-trump-zele/

The usual baseless claims. You can check the sources of his wealth in his tax returns which have been made public for years (unlike the Orange man)

The first sentence of the Politico article: "The White House released a readout of President Donald Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenski" Schiff presented an interpretation of the phone call in a speech, he never claimed it was the original text.

His return has been decided at a higher level than the military elite....

In Thailand, the government certainly doesn't control the NACC and the Judiciary. It's decided at another level.

China has no say on what is allowed or not in the U.S. They cannot "allow" a different set of speech. U.S regulations apply. Since the servers are in the U.S.

Since when is China promoting free speech and free thinking? Lol! Try to write Winny the Poo on Wechat when you are in China. If I have to be spied on by the U.S. only, or by both the U.S. and a fully authoritarian and rival State like China, I prefer to be spied by only by the U.S.

I know that. But the aim of the bill is not to increase censorship or surveillance (of course, TikTok is already spied by the NSA, just as Google). It's above removing the Chinese shareholder. Edit. It's not only the NSA. Since TikTok servers are located in the U.S. for U.S. users, its data is subject to the same laws as Google and others. It means that the U.S. agencies have the same access as with Google and others.

Have you ever looked at China trade statistics? And BRICS is neither an alliance nor a trade zone. The main trade partners of any BRICS country (apart from Russia) are NATO countries and allies. Here are the China trade statistics by country. http://english.customs.gov.cn/Statics/e1351568-5e17-4534-affd-c369e3506613.html

Oh, and I forgot to stress that the title of the OP (Schoolchildren are converting to Islam 'out of fear' in German schools: Study warns) is misleading. In the BZ original article, the title is that a member of security forces sayd that, not that the study stated it.

B.S. That's not the issue. The issue is about removing the Chinese shareholder, not about censoring Riot on.

Complete B.S.! And Blinken would be antisemitic? Are you really that ignorant? 😅

China's trade is dominantly with NATO countries and allies such as Japan, SK, OZ, etc.... and the U.S. is the first trade partner.

Thanks for the picture! I understand better now! 😁

The phone call was recorded. 😆 https://www.politico.com/story/2019/09/25/trump-ukraine-phone-call-transcript-text-pdf-1510770

See my post above.

As I expected, it originates from the BildZeitung! 🤣 https://www.bild.de/politik/inland/staatsschuetzer-schlaegt-alarm-deutsche-kinder-konvertieren-aus-angst-zum-islam-66264176841ad84a3ea833d8?ticket=ST-A-34005-aWLqrudJ1ATAG5bZwXue-sso-signin-server The Daily Mail (which is the source of the OP) added an extra level of distortion and confusion, as it tends to presents statements by an anonymous "Staatschutzer" in a way they can be confused with findings of the study. the Daily Mail also doesn't highlights that it was a survey among Muslim students. Gosh, the Daily Mail has even less professional ethics that the Bildzeitung. 😆 Oh and It's also written in the BZ that the sample is not representative.