Jump to content

johnnybangkok

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    3,209
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

3,521 profile views

johnnybangkok's Achievements

Gold Member

Gold Member (8/14)

  • 10 Posts
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • First Post
  • 5 Reactions Given
  • Very Popular Rare

Recent Badges

9.2k

Reputation

  1. “Worst president in the history of the United States”. Trump - “Hold my beer”
  2. An irrelevant politician trying desperately to keep herself in the spotlight. There was a reason she was 'Britain’s shortest-serving prime minister after a tenure of less than 50 days'. She was useless.
  3. So let's break this all down. 'On February 12, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent met with Zelensky in Kyiv to offer a proposal granting the U.S. access to Ukraine’s mineral rights in exchange for de facto American protection.' - As the article itself states, 'Critics have likened the U.S. insistence on claiming a share of Ukraine’s mineral wealth to a “mafia shakedown' because that's exactly what it is. 'Then, on February 15, Zelensky publicly rejected the proposal at the conference, calling it “not in the interests of a sovereign Ukraine,” - Oh look, the leader of ukraine is looking out for Ukraine - what a surprise! 'The conflict escalated further on February 19 when Zelensky retaliated, accusing Trump of living in a “disinformation space.” - Trump has accused him of being a dictator, of having started the war (one of his most bizarre yet) of having a 4% approval rating and interestingly, nothing about Putin. Trump absolutely lives in the 'disinformation space'. '“It’s a sh*t sandwich,” admitted one Trump administration official' - it certainly is and the bullying tactics of Trump who is literally reading out of a Russian propaganda manual, and not even involving Ukraine in talks about it's own future (as well as ignoring America's European 'partners') is unprecidented in it's lack of worldwide diplomacy and strong-man delusions. The Art of the Deal? Isn't page 1 that you don't reveal your hand BEFORE you start negotiations, yet here we have Trump doing exactly that and toddying to Putin who he hasn't criticised even once during all of this. He calls Zelensky a dictator when there's a VERY obvious one involved in all of this. And before all you Trump fan-boys jump in, let's imagine if the shoe was on the other foot. Let's just imagine it was America that was agressively invaded instead of the Ukraine and the 'peace' negotiations mean America has to give up Hawaii, Florida and Texas as well as all it's mineral rights. How would you all feel about that? No one wants the war in Ukraine to continue but Zelensky is completely justified in his criticism of Trump.
  4. In other words, you’re even too extreme for Riclag 😂
  5. I can't buy any orange make-up. I blame Trump!
  6. Whataboutism at its finest. The subject was Musk and you’ll be hard pressed to find anyone (well perhaps Trump) who lies more.
  7. You were the one that mentioned “old and out of touch”.
  8. And at 75, she’s still 3 years younger than Trump.
  9. Well if he kept his Asperger’s nose out of everything then he wouldn’t be. He’s the one who thinks it’s his divine right (God complex much?) to insert himself into all these situations mostly though cherry picking points, misrepresenting facts and downright lying, All broadcast through one of the biggest load speakers there is. He deserves everything he gets. No sympathy at all for him.
  10. I was just about to say that. Trying to invite comparisons to the two is disingenuos at best, outright lying at worst. Trumps exact words were ''If you don't fight like hell you're not going to have a country anymore' which perhaps could be seen in the same light as Warren's 'We are here to fight back.', if not for the somewhat inconvenient fact that his ganboys then actually did head to The Capitol Building, fought hand-to-hand with the security services before actually invading the building. How anyone can see these two things as being remotely similar is beyond me.
  11. Yes well done, you found the rocking horse $hit I mentioned. As has OneMoreFarang. There will always be an example to find something by someone to “corroborate “ your view but again, it’s VERY rare. If someone is truly trans, then where are they to go? Should they be forced into male changing rooms and men’s toilets where they can face more than a few hysterical women having a hissy fit? As usual, it’s a nuanced subject not helped by the VERY few examples where common sense should prevail. And the “old foggies” I was referring to are you lot.
  12. All the usual old foggies getting their knickers in a twist about complete non -events like trans using women’s bathrooms. Firstly this is as rare as rocking horse $hit, excessively amplified by the right and their quest to make identity politics the main dividing line for us all. living in Bangkok I see ladyboys using women’s toilets ALL the time (it would be more weird to see them use the men’s) and not one single time have I ever seen a women complain about it - so exactly what is the problem? Now if a 6ft brikkie walks in wearing nothing but lipstick then sure, it would be weird but again, what exactly is he going to do? Peer over the cubicles? Try and get a glimpse of a woman on the toilet? It’s just all exaggerated nonsense to get the gullible all worked up. And many of you are falling for it time and time again.
  13. Of course you dont. And I have neither the patience nor the crayons to explain it to you.

×
×
  • Create New...