.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
- Popular Post
roobaa01
-
Posts
1,554 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by roobaa01
-
-
2 minutes ago, candide said:
You made a very precise claim, can you please quote what in Art. 2 Sec.3 supports your claim that it authorised a president to ask a foreign government to discredit a political opponent in the absence of an official investigation?
imo the president's concern about corruption thus guilliani is just in time in kiev to gather evidence which should debunk the dem charade. he will meet with mr. derkatsh ukrainian member of parliament, who claims to be possesing papers that evidently show biden wrongdoing.
wbr
roobaa01
-
1
-
-
legal experts like this stanford university woman are imo doubtful characters when being promoted by an institution close to dems as nominee for the us supreme court. this raises imo concerns about her as an impartial witness.
wbr
roobaa01
-
1
-
1
-
-
euro up from 33.25 to 33.75, kiwi dollar up from 19.25 to 19.75 since last week so something is moving.
wbr
roobaa01
-
a comment from the future the next polls will see trumpy surging for it is no secret that tv participation rates for the impeachment charade have plummeted.
wbr
roobaa01
-
2
-
-
democrats in panic mode is the worst threat to us democracy for example schiff obtaining nunes phone transcripts and then release... this is a threat to basic rights.
wbr
roobaa01
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
9 minutes ago, JCauto said:
To be perfectly clear, the one "dissenting" professor expressed concern that the process needed to be "watertight", that there needed to be a longer time for the investigation and for the people who were directly involved to testify. The Republicans have steadfastly refused to allow that. Indeed, the President suggested that the Impeachment Investigation and Trial proceed as soon as possible, something that puts him at odds with the Congressional Republicans. Which do you believe should be followed, the Professor and his Republican colleagues or the President? Do you agree with the Professor that those issued a subpoena should testify before this inquiry stage is completed?
Lastly, I have to ask "is that the new standard you'd suggest be followed from now on?" Because, if so, then when any President is investigated, they have the right to completely ignore the investigation and legal subpoenas to get the involved parties to testify, then you can close the case and be seen as "innocent" because of the lack of direct testimony to those party to the events? Remember, there will be other presidents whom you don't like so well. Do you wish to give them this same blank cheque to do whatever they want without oversight?the answers will be given by the american public with next polls.
wbr
roobaa01
-
2
-
-
5555 a biased talkshow were democrats failed to present evidence. 3 muppets professors with one sided opinions, one prof turley receiving threats after his disagreeing statement.
charade remains charade. within this charade rep nunes sues fakenews channel cnn for usd $435 million.
wbr
roobaa01
-
2
-
-
41 minutes ago, jany123 said:
Sure... why not... but on the off hand that it does not... on the off hand that it’s (the IGs report) a nothing burger... will you then accept popular wisdom and agree that you have simply been swallowing the trumps?
the crimial referals to be seen very interesting.
wbr
roobaa01
-
- Popular Post
2 minutes ago, bristolboy said:If you are counting on the Republicans in the Senate to call Russian hacking and other clandestine activities re the 2016 election false, keep in mind that the Senate Committee entrusted with investigating said subject, already has confirmed that the Russians' involvement as characterized is a fact.
the ig report on the 9.12 will expose all involvements by deep state officials, dnc corrupt nature etc. and the dem impeachment sham will be contributing to their downfall.
wbr
roobaa01
-
1
-
2
-
300000 to 400000 laid off already
by next year 500000 young graduates are unemployed acc. to bangkok post.
how many lost jobs in the service industry and entertainment industustry due to
tourism decline ??? same in construction due to condo oversupply ???
all tit.
wbr
roobaa01
-
1
-
-
31 minutes ago, Don Mega said:
And ?
Thailand public health system is available to foreigners if they qualify.
my viewpoint why is thailand not opening its health system to foreigners, who are legally married
to a thai supporting the family. of course the foreigner would need to pay contributions for example in germany being on pension about monthly euros 150=thb4500 on every euro 1000 pension. i think that would be fair.
wbr
roobaa01
-
to all readers....im married to my thai wife for 20 years now. my wife entered germany 1999 and was covered through my public german family health insurance the first she set foot on german soil.
now im retired and we are living in thailand but no public family health care , why ?? only available for public servants.
wbr
roobaa01
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, Sticky Wicket said:
Because Thailand is so special, it's the Number 1 country in the world!
yeah amazing thai statistics.
wbr
roobaa01
-
2
-
-
can someone explain....india is currently experiecing its worst economic slump since 2008, thus how does that correspond to rising indian tourism and spending thb 10k a day.
wbr
roobaa01
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, candide said:What you call evidences are allegations.
And when you are confronted with evidence, you never contradict them. Just come up with general blah blah like in this post.
So two former ambassadors publicly complaining that Zlochevsky and Burisma were not investigated (including while Shokin was General prosecutor): is it fake news? Do you deny it?
The EU and IMF also asking for Shokin to be fired, and IMF's Lagarde publicly threatening to withold funds, is it fake news?
Shokin quasi-unanimously voted out by the Ukraine parliament, is it fake news?
Former Ukranian vice- general prosecutors and general prosecutor confirming there was no active investigation at that time, is it fake news?
Biden applying official US policy and supporting complaints by ambassadors, is it fake news?
fake news is what cnn hoax news and the daily beast reported about senator nunes and ukraine last friday for that nunes goin to drag cnn etc...to court, lovely.
wbr
roobaa01
-
1
-
2
-
2
-
- Popular Post
9 minutes ago, candide said:Lol. As usual Trumpist link sources that provide no evidence.
The document is a lame attempt by the GOP Senate to justify ex-post (letter dated 15 Nov.) Trump's allegation. And as usual citing Solomon's biased report (biased and concocted by Giuliani and Parnas).
Plenty of evidence that Shokin was not investigationg, i.e. this citation from the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine in September 2015, while Schokin was General prosecutor?
"We have learned that there have been times that the PGO not only did not support investigations into corruption, but rather undermined prosecutors working on legitimate corruption cases.
For example, in the case of former Ecology Minister Mykola Zlochevsky [cq], the U.K. authorities had seized 23 million dollars in illicit assets that belonged to the Ukrainian people. Officials at the PGO’s office were asked by the U.K to send documents supporting the seizure.
Instead they sent letters to Zlochevsky’s attorneys attesting that there was no case against him. As a result, the money was freed by the U.K. court and shortly thereafter the money was moved to Cyprus.
The misconduct by the PGO officials who wrote those letters should be investigated, and those responsible for subverting the case by authorizing those letters should – at a minimum – be summarily terminated.”
https://www.justsecurity.org/66271/timeline-trump-giuliani-bidens-and-ukrainegate/
we will see imo about the bidens after lindsay graham has received the documents from pompeo about the ukraine.
wbr
roobaa01
-
4
-
2
-
On 11/25/2019 at 10:50 AM, Chomper Higgot said:
I suspect the next step will include the investigation of other crimes.
We shall today get the court ruling on McGahn giving testimony, a ruling that will equally apply to Bolton.
Lav Parnas has handed documents and recordings to Congress and expressed a desire to give testimony.
Trump’s tax records court battle is nearing an end.
And in the background NY has a Grand Jury in process examining Trump’s businesses.
Trump’s impeachment hearings have only just started.
reality also started with gallup- 53 % against trump impeachment and removal, 43 % are in favour,
a 10 % reality.
see what the supreme court can do for donald, tax return issues have gone well.
wbr
roobaa01
-
2
-
1
-
-
reminds me of bare air the oz airline, where female cabin crew served nakedly after take off.
wbr
roobaa01
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
1 minute ago, stevenl said:You do realise that the impeachment is about Trumps quid pro quo, not about Biden's request on behalf of the US government?
how can it be quid pro quo without first hand testimonies ??? or is it bribery based on hearsay ??
wbr
roobaa01
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
2
-
- Popular Post
8 minutes ago, TopDeadSenter said:A bunch of triggered neverTrumper civil servants that think they know better than the President up on the stand. We have a disappearing whistleblower who was removed from the witch-hunt when his partisan past behavior and political activism was uncovered. We heard 2nd and 3rd hand hearsay. We heard 2nd hand hearsay by one of a bunch of wine drinking diners at a busy restaurant that overheard a mobile conversation on the other side of the table(my favorite!). Assumptions and presumptions. No witness showed any hard evidence that Trump extorted the Ukrainian president. The Ukrainian president said he was not extorted or pressured. There was no conference where the Ukrainian president said he was investigating Biden. The aid money was paid in full. The only real hard evidence were the transcripts that proved there was no extortion. Did I miss anything?
the dem smearsay verbal change from quid pro quo to extortion to bribery based on fake media opinion poll.
wbr
roobaa01
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
3
-
- Popular Post
1 minute ago, Saint Nick said:You don't get it, obviously!
A bunch of people by now, confirmed, what ever the whistleblower said!
The whistleblower could be Hillary Clinton herself...IT...DOES...NOT...MATTER!
There are a bunch of people (handpicked by Trump, military personal etc) who absolutely confirmed the quid pro quo, the bribery, that is was all orchestrated by Trump and his goons and they all KNEW IT and knew, what it meant!
nothing but hearsay, no first hand account information only opinions.
wbr
roobaa01
-
6
-
2
-
6
-
2
-
5
-
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, TopDeadSenter said:Such anger and hatred. Clearly one side is terrified of this farce getting to the senate where witnesses selection can not be controlled and weaponized by the dems. And rightly so. As soon as Schiff is dragged up to testify about his coordination with the "whistleblower", his lying about not knowing the whisleblower he coordinated with, and the whistleblower himself being asked about his links to the dem elite, and Biden "son of a bleep he got fired". Oh yes, this will be a classic. No wonder Trump wants this.
glory, glory, halleluja the democratic smearsay and hearsay finally be put on trial and their corrupt nature exposed to the public. im missing our democratic prosecutor obviously not much to write.
wbr
roobaa01
-
8
-
1
-
3
-
1
-
1
-
1 hour ago, Trolleen said:
Many different people come to Thailand. Not enjoy to meet all of them.
English American Getto people.
Russian together with Chinese and Indian.
Soon will come Africa people
africans are already there see pratunam in bkk. but i wonder about india experiencing its worst economic slump since 2008 hence indian tourism to los high ???
wbr
roobaa01
-
13 hours ago, stat said:
Thanks for the information regarding Hanse Merkur!
Was the certificate accepted at embassy and did you manage to get past immigration with the health insurance certificate?
Not even sure if I will stay longer then one year so will go for longstay but thanks for pointing out the alternative. Main reason for sticking with longstay is that I do not need to do visa runs that take a full day each and cost additional money.
1. it is written clearly in the police order non-oa issue after the 31.10.19 for 1 rst year foreign insurance policies are accepted. no i did not enter the country as i stay here on marriage extension. a member in this german forum nittaya.de posted about hanse merkur.
2. you miss out on the fact that non-o's can be converted into extensions of stay 12 months plus multiple re-entry total cost thb 5700, serving in the same way as non-oa. thereto no health insurance issue. anyway you pay about euro 150 thb 5025 visa fees in germany.
wbr
roobaa01
Pelosi pursues articles of impeachment against Trump, says democracy at stake
in World News
Posted
thereto the bidens, schiff, the fakeblower would be wonderful x-mas entertainment.
also more important to us people than the dem impeachment charade 266 k jobs added, 54k manufcturing jobs added, 3 % eco growth, 3.1 % wage growth.
is nunes suing schiff for violation of civil rights in conjunction with his phone transcription release ???
wbr
roobaa01