rasg

And how would you know? Christopher Wray, answering questions (or not) in Congress admitted that they had more than a single CHS in the crowd on 6th Jan.

We already know about Ray Epps but you can guarantee many more, simply because he refused to give a number.

So, please tell. What have you seen first hand that others have not or who can’t find out for themselves?

I have friends from the US who know far less than me simply because they are not that interested or swallow the bilge that the MSM put out as news. 

5 hours ago, Steven55 said:

So many well-know Reps admitted "NO FRAUD" Many courts concluded "NO FRAUD" . Pls inform yourself how Roger Stone already in 2016 designed the "Stop the Steal" campaign, which wasn't activated in 2016, but later in 2020. a Danish documentary reveals his criminal actions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Storm_Foretold

No a single court ruled no fraud. They almost all admitted no standing, which of course is (and was) pure nonsense.

6 hours ago, Steven55 said:

Rasg, You look at it from the point of view of Babbit. Now, let's look at it from another angle: Think about this: you support the 2nd amendment, you are at home and an angry mob storms your house. Four unarmed guards have given up defending your house. Next, the mob breaks your windows with sticks, one person without a stick climbs through your window. You don't know anything what this person has said or done in the minutes before she tried entering your house. You want to defend your family at all costs, you are stressed, you give a warning that you will shoot, however, that person continues climbing through the window. Next you shoot. I bet you are convinced you did what you had to do and that it was right. Agree?

No I don't. Have you watched Babit's execution? I have. It was a cold blooded murder.

12 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

Because you don't care if a jury found Trump liable for sexual assault. 

 

If the victim were your relative, you might feel differently.

Hilarious! E Jean Carroll was a serial accuser of men for rape and couldn’t even remember the month or year it was supposed to have taken place.
 

They even had to change the law so she could bring the case.

2 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

One jury found Trump guilty of felonies, another found Trump liable for sexual assault.

Correct. Felonies that have literally been Trumped up for Trump as they were nothing more than misdemeanours.

They had to change the law to bring the E Jean Carroll sexual assault case. She couldn’t even remember what month or even the year that it took place. Oh. I forgot. She has made the similar allegations several times before...

3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

DNC, Clinton campaign agree to Steele dossier funding fine | AP News

 

So you now admit that Trump was never convicted of sexual abuse, much less rape likec you have been falsely claiming, 

 

Thank for coming clean, Feel better now? 

The only crime committed by Trump will be overturned on appeal as Jack Smith was found to have been improperly appointed by the DOJ. That judgement was by SCOTUS.

The same for all the others was that he was found liable for in stacked civil courts. All are dead in the water. No convictions or guilty decisions in civil courts.

6 hours ago, Dan O said:

Not sure what you consider an insurrection then if invading the Capitol with the express purpose of taking hostages and preventing the confirmation of the presidential appointment is not a insurrection. You may want to talk with the Proud Boys or Oath Keepers about your position as they may believe it. You can call it whatever you want and it won't change a thing that happened and won't save the orange idiot for his role in insighting it

You had to make it sound even sillier than it was. "Taking hostages!" 😂😂😂 If I was Kier Starmer, I would have said taking sausages which would probably be more accurate. I'm looking forward to the true numbers of FBI stooges who were in the crowd stirring the crowd up. They've refused to answer the question so far but it will come out soon.

10 hours ago, Captain Monday said:

Can we agree there are no structural election issues or significant voter fraud?

 

That's the most ridiculous thing I have read.

You'll find out exactly how much voter fraud took place in 2020 and IS taking place over the coming weeks,

10 hours ago, Steven55 said:

Trump said on Jan 6, 2021: "Walk to the Capitol, fight like hell, I will walk with you".
Next, Trump went home , the crowd walked to the Capitol without coward Trump and 5 people died. Which makes Trump liable for third-degree man-slaughter??? (He was asked by his staff in the White House to tell the crowd to stop it, but he didn't do a thing for one hour... Not empathy, no integrity, just selfishness and showing to be completely incompetent.)

I decided to stay out of this thread because most of what has been said is pure nonsense but I can’t let this one go.

Two people died on Jan 6th. Ashlie Babit was shot by a Michael Bird who was under no threat whatsoever. She had at least four riot police behind her and was no threat whatsoever.
Roseanne Boyland was beaten to death by the police at the entrance to the tunnel.

If you take a look at the latest CCTV from Jan 6th you can see it for yourself.

 

25 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

I have no idea what you are talking about.

 

Hillary Clinton commented on the dangers of commercial social media platforms using propaganda to influence elections. Don't you agree that could be a problem?

Isn't it funny? You are happy that Mark Zuckerberg, Google, YouTube and others were influencing the election in 2020 because it allowed the Dems to win. Zuckerberg to the tune of $420 million to "fortify" the election in the Dem's favour" and also to censor anti Dem voices. By the way. Fortify the election means cheat.

It's well documented and Zuckerberg has been trying to cover his backside over the last few weeks by apologising for it. Not only for suppressing the Hunter Biden laptop story but also for the $420 million Zuckerbucks scam.
 

4 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

I have no idea what you are talking about.

And that's the whole point. You have no idea about what is REALLY going on in your own country because you believe everything that Hillary Clinton tells you. You will find out very shortly.

2 hours ago, candide said:

And your demonstration that "almost without exception.... is an example which doesn't confirm your assertion. The Durham investigation has been a huge fail, to the point that Riclag took out his picture from his profile. 🤣

Tee hee. John Durham is about to get started. He got the evidence that he needed on the Clinton campaign, the Steele dossier etc.

11 hours ago, Kwaibill said:

 

Show where any of those you specifically named have advocated specifically changing the U.S. Constitution, Frank.

Well Hillary has spent the last week explaining that the Libtards want to change the freedom of speech laws with good old fashioned censorship so there is that for starters. They hate the truth which is why they being hit from every angle at the moment AND it's about to get a lot worse for them.

To answer the original question, "Why is the MAGA movement so susceptible to crazy conspiracy theories?" the answer is this.

What starts as a conspiracy theory has, almost without exception, turned out to be true. Russia, Russia, Russia was exposed my John Durham as a huge hoax, for example.