Rob13

If those Grab Car taxis were any good the  drivers would be out there finding lost piles of money and returning them to the rightful owners.

If you take the sleeper, make sure you get the lower berth. Upper berth is pretty small.

Apparently, Jared's been preparing his defense by  watching reruns of the Iran/Contra  trial.  

Quote

Top presidential adviser Jared Kushner’s legal team pushed back Friday night against a report that the White House senior adviser and Trump son-in-law had at least three undisclosed contacts with a Russian ambassador during and after the 2016 presidential campaign, saying he had “no recollection” of the alleged exchanges.

 

"Mr. Kushner participated in thousands of calls in this time period. He has no recollection of the calls as described,” Kushner’s lawyer Jamie Gorelick told POLITICO in a statement, responding to a Reuters report about Kushner's contacts with Russian ambassador to the U.S. Sergey Kislyak.

 

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/26/jared-kushner-russian-contacts-238877

 

40 minutes ago, robertthesculptor said:

Why is an incompetent under educated person with sexual issues in charge anyway.

 

The thread's not about POTUS.

Gecko farming is  a burgeoning industry. 

It's the lattice of coincidence 

2 hours ago, mtls2005 said:

Just prior to this video starting Trump looked lost and confused...maybe he was tired? 

 

Stress of the job is wearing on him. How's he gonna last 4 years.

10 minutes ago, ilostmypassword said:

People didn't work for food stamps or, for that matter, food, or welfare in the new deal. They were given all kinds of jobs and paid for their labor. For able bodied workers that would be a great idea.

Here is a pretty thorough discussion of the welfare situation in the usa.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2015/09/08/ben-carsons-claim-that-we-have-10-times-people-more-people-on-welfare/?utm_term=.d7a3403aea59

Same as the New Deal programs or something different, doesn't much matter. The idea being if you require the recipients to work, it would reduce the numbers of people trying to defraud the program.  It could work well with trump's infra-structure plan, and the wall to for that matter. 

5 hours ago, Ahab said:

So enforce the rules, cut out the fraud and you could also cut the money required to fund the people that actually need the help. 

Or better yet, build in a deterrence to fraud. Make the recipients work for the food stamps and welfare ala FDR's New Deal. As long as the govt is handing out free money, there will people telling lies to get it. 

6 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

No point in doing so as it's never going to happen that an anti Trumper will ever admit that Trump has done anything right.

Can't win; don't try 555

Keep on trollin then.

6 hours ago, webfact said:

 

"We can't let a madman with nuclear weapons let on the loose like that," Trump said. "

39 minutes ago, Ahab said:

I went to live with my older sister and we were on government assistance. No one wants to cut assistance to those that need it, to get them back on their feet, but welfare fraud is rampant in the USA and only someone that willfully ignores it or chooses not to see it would state otherwise.

So you understand leftism after all.

Fraud is a reason to enforce the rules not a reason to cut out the programs. 

5 hours ago, Ahab said:

Makes no sense to me, but leftism makes no sense to me either.

Think about leftism next month when you get your social security.  Should make more sense to you that way.

5 hours ago, funandsuninbangkok said:

Funny how you want to get rid of Trump just because he won but never complained about Obama even during crap like this. 

 

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/may/24/whistleblower-dhs-knowingly-let-ms-13-gang-members/

 

 

Saying 'yeah but Obama' isn't an argument for trump, it's just evidence that they're both inept. If you're trying to convince people that trump is a good choice as pres,  try showing how the country's better off since he took office, or at least how good his policies are.The 'yeah but argument' is just trolling.

1 hour ago, habanero said:

On 5/21/2017 at 4:14 PM, Rob13 said:

 

 What crime has been committed?

Dunno, that's why there's an investigation. Here's a list of possibilities:....Obstuction of justice, taking bribes, collusion(it is crime), election tampering, hacking. treason,,,,,Pretty long list really.

One day an Indian boy asked his father why they have such long names? The dad answers, "Well son whenever a Indian baby is born the father would go outside and name the baby after the first thing he sees... Why do you ask Two Dogs <deleted>."

1 hour ago, masuk said:

I hope the rescuer doesn't catch something nasty. The water in the moat looked far from clean recently.

First thing i thought too. Think I'd take a round of antibiotics if it were me.

1 hour ago, gk10002000 said:

while walking early at 630 AM, passing several joggers, old people walking etc, a cop pulled over and demanded he frisk me saying I looked suspicous and wanted to know what I was doing walking at 630!

Try trading the trench coat and loafers  in for a  ski parka and some adidas.

3 hours ago, hyku1147 said:

The same swelling  psychosocial dynamic (pack mentality) that prevented Lefties from seeing through Moore's blatant facade, is preventing "anti Trumpers" from conducting proper self analysis.

Kinda like the same psychosocial dynamic that keeps the trumpies from seeing their candidate for what he really is......funny how that works.

On 9/4/2015 at 3:13 PM, StevieDee said:

I have never seen what does it it's not a mosquito or wasp.

Sounds like a noseeum. 

41 minutes ago, smedly said:

some are over 50 and still have no income from outside

Unless they're running online scams then the moneys coming to them from anywhere they set up an account.

13 minutes ago, funandsuninbangkok said:

To bring articles of impeachment against a president requires a majority vote in the House of Representatives. When the case is tried by the Senate, a vote of at least 2/3 of those present is required to convict and remove the president from office. T

If  Mueller digs up some solid evidence that trump broke the law then it's a pretty short step  to think enough GOP congressman would vote to get rid of a criminal  instead of risking votes supporting one. It  all comes down to people saving their own backside.

Probably oughta wait out the investigation  before passing out cigars.

1 minute ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I support anyone against HRC.

 

Fair enough. 

IMHO, to get the US off of oil it's going to take a Pres, willing to increase  spending on public services like busses, trains, bike paths, alternative energy etc. Pretty much everything an average GOP nominee would campaign against. 

5 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Stop buying Saudi oil. 

I'd really like to see the west have to give up it's love affair with cars and go back to public transport or bicycles in cities. Be a good result.

What is wrong with you?

Why would you support trump if you want to to see the US get greener?

1 hour ago, stander said:

A majority of American voters say there is no evidence of collusion between members of President Trump’s campaign and Russia and most are doubtful that investigations into the matter will lead to impeachment.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/334612-poll-most-say-trump-wont-be-impeached

Pretty silly poll...innit.

Why would you conduct an investigation if you already have evidence?

Cops don't search your car because they have evidence, they search your car because they have probable cause to look for evidence.

As the article says 75% of Americans agree that there is enough probable cause to warrant a search into Trumps activities.  Sounds like a vote of no confidence to me.