Jump to content

LolaS

Member
  • Posts

    393
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by LolaS

  1. On 5/26/2017 at 5:43 AM, Ruffian Dick said:

    I believe you're missing my irony. --> :wink:

    Nice places like CM get "discovered" too often; it's getting crowded enough as it is.

    oh I see, actually there is decline of population in thailand and in north, I would like to see some data backing this claim.

  2. Honestly, ne or two days when there is burning from hills, but that is all. any other example is an exaggeration.

    Yes I have asthma but by living in Chiang Mai condition got better and I never used inhalator (pump) or any strong medication, I only used montek because I m on contraceptions and being 35, maybe you are all older person and this can cause some problems if you have underlying conditions. I dont know.

    my familly lives in Germany, Poland, and Russia, coutry that have longer winter and more smoke due to the burning of coal and wood, trust me that air is far far far more worst.

    I live around robinson, and I work around CMU; 

    I usually walk or take a red car or now uber, and I never NEVer had problem with air. of course there are few days smoky, but still !! nothing. i dont deny that there are few days, but comapring to those places that I been , visited or lived, chiang mai is heaven. Of course i dont deny that older ppl should take care of themselves and move somewhere appropriate

    • Like 1
  3. 3 years I am here, I dont use pump anymore, I dont use powder Turbuhaler as I did in Europe, only monteklukast, but that is nothing unusual since it is also good prevention of contraception side-effects.

    PM2.5 are tiny particles in the air that reduce visibility and cause the air to appear hazy when levels are elevated. I m sorry but in 3 years in chiang mai I never saw hazy air

     

  4. 2 hours ago, tropico said:

    what is 500?

     

    look at the table chart below. the worst country in Europe is Bulgaria with annual average concentrations of about 35 micrograms/m3. 

     

    Chiang Mai averages 54 micrograms/m3

     

    show me some data. first you accused me of making fake claims and i provided you with some references ....i haven't seen anything that proves your theory and that would suggest Chiang Mai air is healthy.

     

     

     

    Screenshot_20170228-131838.png

     

    again you pull data from different context ( in this sense annual for country) and compare it with densely populated city. good job,  in mixing frogs and horses. 

  5. 6 hours ago, tropico said:

    Thailand made their own standards which are double and more than double of the one from WHO. Therefore even though it is green or blue on the Thai AQI tables, it is hazardous anywhere else WHO standards are followed.  Also, this is what is stated on the document: " The 2  current AQI is still based on PM10 and vastly under-reports air pollution levels and underestimates health risks". If you think that the air is good or is much better than many other places that is up to you but I think the air quality is not up to standards and it could pose a risk. And that is why I thought this document could have been interesting.

    Thank you for your comment though!

     

    care to provide any reference for your fake claim?

×
×
  • Create New...