Social Media

Repetitive criticisms of the Asean News Item have been removed @Chomper Higgot 17. ASEAN NOW news team collects news articles from various recognised and reputable news sources. The articles may be consolidated from different sources and rewritten with AI assistance These news items are shared in our forums for members to stay informed and engaged. Our dedicated news team puts in the effort to deliver quality content, and we ask for your respect in return. Any disrespectful comments about our news articles or the content itself, such as calling it "clickbait" or “slow news day”, and criticising grammatical errors, will not be tolerated and appropriate action will be taken. Please note that republished articles may contain errors or opinions that do not reflect the views of ASEAN NOW. If you'd like to help us, and you see an error with an article, then please use the report function so that we can attend to it promptly.

In the wake of Donald Trump’s recent election as president, a surge in sexist attacks targeting women has flooded social media, as reported by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD), a think tank based in London. These attacks, which include misogynistic comments and hate speech, intensified following a viral post by white nationalist Nick Fuentes on X, formerly Twitter. Fuentes’ message, “Your body, my choice. Forever,” a provocative twist on the reproductive rights slogan “my body, my choice,” quickly became a rallying cry for right-wing men disparaging women on social media. The slogan gained traction particularly in response to posts by women expressing disappointment in the election results. According to the ISD’s analysis, Fuentes’ slogan was referenced thousands of times daily across social media platforms in the week following the election. The number of mentions peaked at over 12,000 on Friday. The report documented a staggering 4,600% spike in the phrases “your body, my choice” and “get back in the kitchen” on X within a 24-hour period late last week. Beyond social media, the report also notes offline harassment, including reports of young boys echoing the misogynistic phrase on school campuses. Merchandise with “Your body, my choice” emblazoned on hats and T-shirts also began appearing on e-commerce sites. ISD’s U.S. director of technology, Isabelle Frances-Wright, co-authored the report and commented on the alarming trend in an email statement, explaining that this phenomenon illustrates how influential online figures can sway not only digital discourse but also real-life behavior, particularly among young men. “One of the alarming characteristics of this trend is how quickly online influencers, known for propagating hate, can influence both online and offline behaviors, most especially the behaviors of young men,” Frances-Wright stated. The recent rise in gender-based vitriol reflects a broader trend of hateful rhetoric following Trump’s election victory, including instances of racist harassment. The report cites cases in which Black Americans received texts containing racial slurs, including messages that read they had been “chosen to pick cotton ‘at the nearest plantation.’” The FBI and other law enforcement agencies are investigating these texts, though their sources and motivations remain unclear. Gender dynamics played a significant role in the recent election, largely due to Vice President Kamala Harris’s presidential campaign, which prioritized reproductive rights—a key issue for women voters. Pre-election polls showed a significant gender gap between the candidates, with Trump and his supporters frequently targeting Harris with misogynistic language. Trump himself made disparaging remarks in July, claiming that world leaders would view Harris “like a play toy” based on her appearance. Allies of Trump also suggested that her rise in politics was simply a product of diversity, equity, and inclusion policies. An ad from Elon Musk’s America PAC, since deleted, went as far as calling Harris the C-word and labeling her a “Communist.” As these attacks proliferate online, they reveal an intensifying trend in digital hate speech, raising concerns about the implications of social media as a platform for divisive and harmful rhetoric. Based on a report by NBC 2024-11-14

President-elect Donald Trump has announced former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee as his nominee for U.S. ambassador to Israel, a choice that signals a potential shift in American policy toward a more pro-settlement stance. Huckabee, a longtime ally of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, has consistently voiced support for Israeli settlers and has even backed the possibility of Israel annexing parts of the occupied West Bank. Huckabee’s relationship with Netanyahu and his outspoken support for settlements are significant, especially given Israel’s current pro-settler government. Some within the Israeli right-wing are now optimistic that Trump’s upcoming administration may be the most pro-settler U.S. administration in history, amplifying support for policies that favor expansion in the West Bank. Trump's own perspective is echoed in his endorsement, where he remarked, “Mike Huckabee loves Israel and the people of Israel... he will work tirelessly to bring about peace in the Middle East.” Huckabee’s commitment to Israel and his views on the West Bank are well-documented. In 2015, he controversially asserted that Israel’s historical connection to the West Bank is stronger than that of the United States to Manhattan. Four years later, Huckabee went on to declare that he believed Israel had the right to annex parts of the West Bank. His views on Palestinian statehood have also been clear for over a decade; during his 2008 presidential campaign, Huckabee stated, “there’s really no such thing as a Palestinian” and argued that if there were to be a Palestinian state, it should be established within the borders of other Arab nations rather than Israel. Netanyahu’s own stance on annexation has evolved over time, particularly under the Trump administration’s previous term. Toward the end of Trump’s first term, Netanyahu considered declaring the annexation of parts of the West Bank but ultimately did not align with Trump’s team on the matter. Now, with Huckabee’s potential ambassadorship, some right-wing members of Netanyahu’s government are reigniting calls for annexation following Trump’s victory. Yet annexing West Bank settlements would be a contentious move, widely viewed as illegal under international law, and would likely trigger global condemnation. This step could also further obstruct any potential pathway to a Palestinian state, as international bodies largely view Israeli settlements as a critical barrier to a two-state solution. The implications of Huckabee’s nomination are complex, as Trump has not yet clarified his administration’s full approach to Israeli-Palestinian relations, particularly concerning settlement expansion and annexation. Nevertheless, Huckabee’s alignment with Israeli settlement interests points toward a U.S. policy that may be more openly supportive of pro-settlement initiatives, potentially reshaping U.S.-Israel relations and altering the course of Middle Eastern diplomacy. Based on a report by AXIOS 2024-11-14

I was preparing for Remembrance Sunday when two police officers arrived at my door. It was early, around 9:40 a.m., and my things were laid out—a black dress, black tights, a coat, and a new poppy to pair with my vintage enamel one. I hadn’t dressed yet when my husband told me the police were there for me. Assuming it was about the road being closed for the parade, I went downstairs, still in my dressing gown, and greeted the officers. What they told me left me speechless. The officer on the left, PC S, informed me that I was accused of a "non-crime hate incident" (NCHI) over something I posted on X (formerly Twitter) a year ago, allegedly stirring up racial hatred. Shocked, I asked, "What did I post that was so offensive?" He replied that he couldn’t tell me. “Who made this complaint?” I asked. He couldn’t tell me that either, only referring to the complainant as “the victim.” I stood there, trying to process it all, feeling like I’d entered some Kafkaesque nightmare. With Remembrance Day preparations in the background, I thought of the soldiers who fought and died for our freedom. "Today, we are commemorating British men who gave their lives so we could live in a free country,” I told the officers. “And here you are, accusing me on this sacred day for something that didn’t even break the law.” It struck me how un-British this felt—an intrusion of the state into my life over a vague complaint. As they left, I wondered if the officers felt any shame for disrupting Remembrance Sunday with what felt like an authoritarian intrusion. Perhaps they’d just laugh it off over coffee. I felt fortunate to have a platform, support from the Free Speech Union, and the knowledge to fight this. But others might not be as lucky, and I realized how intimidating such an encounter could be for someone without the same support. These NCHIs, it seems, are designed to chill free speech and discourage dissenting opinions. Recently, Essex Police released a statement saying my post is now being investigated as a criminal matter under Section 17 of the Public Order Act 1986. Ironically, the change in approach wasn’t even conveyed to me on Sunday. This isn’t an isolated incident. I spoke with Bernie Spofforth, a businesswoman whose retweet misidentifying an alleged attacker led to her arrest and 36 hours in custody. Though ultimately, the case was dismissed, the experience left her devastated. How can a social media post justify such severe consequences? Harry Miller, a former police officer, also had a similar experience, recorded as an NCHI for questioning transgender issues on Twitter. Winning a court case, he showed that NCHIs interfere with free expression. But these cases persist. The Free Speech Union discovered that, since 2014, more than 250,000 NCHIs have been recorded in England and Wales. Despite government attempts to reduce these incidents, their numbers are only increasing. In theory, officers are now directed to only record incidents showing clear “intentional hostility.” But it seems the police are more focused on recording incidents that garner them approval from interest groups. Meanwhile, serious crimes like stabbings and burglaries go unresolved. Some officials may want to expand NCHIs, but as writer Charles Bukowski said, “Censorship is the tool of those who have the need to hide actualities from themselves and from others.” If we are truly to honor those who sacrificed their lives for freedom, then we must safeguard the rights they fought to protect. We should hope that our leaders stand for free speech and focus on addressing real threats to public safety, not silencing opinions. Remembrance Sunday should be a day of pride, not a reminder of how far we’ve strayed from the freedoms once fought for. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-11-14

Special Counsel Jack Smith is reportedly planning to retire before President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration in January, effectively sidestepping any immediate attempts by the incoming president to remove him from office. This early retirement would prevent Trump, who has vowed to “fire” Smith within “two seconds” of taking the oath of office, from taking direct action against the man responsible for leading high-profile investigations against him. Smith, whose work has focused on federal criminal cases tied to Trump’s alleged attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election and his handling of classified documents, is aiming to conclude his cases ahead of Trump’s anticipated return to the presidency on January 20, 2025. According to sources cited by the New York Times, Smith’s choice to retire ahead of Trump’s inauguration aligns with his commitment to complete his prosecutorial responsibilities while avoiding direct confrontation with the next administration. This decision highlights the longstanding Department of Justice policy of avoiding the prosecution of a sitting president, a principle that has shaped Smith’s timeline. DOJ officials reportedly believe that pursuing charges against a sitting president would be both legally and practically challenging, given the power of the executive office. Therefore, as Trump’s presidency looms, the DOJ appears ready to wrap up its pursuits to ensure that any remaining cases can be handled without direct presidential interference. Smith’s proactive departure reflects the broader strategy among federal prosecutors and officials who anticipate Trump’s potential moves to dismiss or undermine those involved in any criminal cases against him. Trump’s statement that he would waste no time firing the special counsel underscores his discontent with Smith’s investigations and hints at his likely approach to handling those in government positions linked to actions against him. By retiring before the presidential handover, Smith not only completes his work on his own terms but also reinforces a protective boundary against political retribution. The decision ultimately highlights the tension between presidential power and the Department of Justice’s mission of upholding the rule of law. For Smith, retiring early becomes both a professional safeguard and a message of independence, signaling that his work concludes on his own timeline and not at the behest of the new administration. Based on a report by NYP 2024-11-12

The Conservative Party has edged ahead of Labour in the latest voter opinion poll, showing a shift in public support following the appointment of Kemi Badenoch as party leader. According to a survey by the research group More in Common, the Conservatives now hold a two-point lead, with 29% of voters supporting them compared to Labour’s 27%—their strongest lead since Labour’s sweeping general election win in July. This survey positions Reform UK in third place with 19%, followed by the Liberal Democrats with 11%, and the Greens with 8%. A previous poll by BMG Research at the end of October had also shown the Conservatives slightly ahead, suggesting that recent changes in the political landscape have impacted public opinion. One of the main reasons for this shift appears to be the sharp drop in Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s popularity. Since its peak in early August, his approval rating has declined by nearly 40 points. In contrast, Badenoch holds a net approval rating of -3, significantly higher than Starmer’s -25, although many voters still report being unfamiliar with her leadership style and approach. Some of Labour's recent policy choices may also be contributing to this decline. Polling experts cite controversies such as the party’s decision to cut the winter fuel allowance and debates over the distribution of “freebies” as factors undermining Labour’s standing with voters. One of Labour’s most criticized proposals—the plan to impose inheritance tax on farmland valued at over £1 million—has stirred widespread disapproval, with nearly six in 10 voters opposing the measure, according to More in Common. These issues seem to be chipping away at Labour's initial support, allowing the Conservatives to regain ground. Luke Tryl, UK director of More in Common, attributes Labour's recent drop in popularity to what he describes as perceived “missteps” by the party. He notes that Badenoch’s leadership has encouraged voters to envision a viable alternative, thus benefiting the Conservatives. “We know that things like the cuts to the winter fuel allowance had an impact on [Labour’s] standing, similar to the row over freebies. That’s now translating into a boost for the Tories because they now have a leader. There’s a leader people can imagine voting for,” Tryl explained. This perception of a fresh start under Badenoch appears to have spurred a positive shift in voter sentiment toward the Conservatives. Reflecting on the impact of Badenoch’s appointment, Tryl highlighted that her leadership has allowed the party to distinguish itself from its previous administration. For comparison, Rishi Sunak, the outgoing prime minister, had a net approval rating of -35 when he resigned. Badenoch’s perceived difference from past leadership has helped shape the Tories' improved polling performance. Tryl also commented on the broader political environment, noting that voters today are more volatile and less inclined to give extended "honeymoon periods" to new leaders. “People think there’s been mistakes. We have a much more volatile electorate, and people are impatient. The era of long honeymoons is over,” he remarked. This heightened scrutiny on leadership changes means that while Labour initially enjoyed strong support, Badenoch’s fresh approach and Labour's recent setbacks have shifted the balance back toward the Conservatives. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-11-14

For those looking to get away from U.S. politics over the next four years, Villa Vie Residences has introduced the Tour La Vie program, a residential cruise that allows participants to travel the world while avoiding life back home. Through this program, travelers have the chance to explore over 140 countries and skip any unwanted political atmosphere at home. The program's inspiration, according to Mikael Petterson, CEO of Villa Vie Residences, came from the general tension in the political climate rather than specific election outcomes. “We came up with this marketing campaign before we even knew who would win. Regardless of who would have won, you would have half of the population upset,” Petterson told *Newsweek.* “Quite frankly, we don't have a political view one way or the other. We just wanted to give people who feel threatened to have a way to get out.” The Tour La Vie program offers a range of flexible packages to cater to different timelines. The annual "Escape from Reality" option costs nearly $40,000, while the four-year “Skip Forward” package for the duration of a presidential term costs $256,000 for single travelers or $320,000 for two. Those wanting shorter getaways can choose two- or three-year packages under options like "Mid-term Selection" and "Everywhere but Home." For those looking at a year-long cruise, the cost is approximately $80,000 for single travelers or $50,000 per person when shared. Announcing the cruise led to an immediate surge in interest, Petterson said, noting a significant increase in calls and inquiries. Since Villa Vie typically sees a two- to three-week lead time for bookings, it’s expected that the company will soon know how quickly the cruise fills up. Offering up to 650 spots, the ship will visit 425 ports worldwide, providing an abundance of adventures for its residents. With an itinerary that includes a month in the Caribbean and a four-month journey around South America, travelers can look forward to two Panama Canal transits, explorations of the Chilean Fjords, a close-up view of Antarctica, Carnival in Rio, and even an Amazon River cruise. Though Tour La Vie is geared toward long-term exploration, travelers can still stay connected to home. Thanks to mail services routed through the corporate office to the ship, residents can maintain voting rights, ensuring that even those away for the 2028 elections can still cast their ballots. According to Petterson, the cruise primarily attracts three groups: retirees, some as old as 92; semi-retired individuals; and younger digital nomads. As the Villa Vie Odyssey embarks on the second month of its ambitious 15-year voyage, it promises to take residents to all seven continents, 13 World Wonders, and over 100 tropical islands. The all-inclusive package covers meals, drinks, a free first medical consultation, and bi-weekly housekeeping. There’s high-speed internet as well, enabling residents to stay in touch with friends and family, who can also join the cruise for $129 a day. "I think the world cruising market is growing and growing,” Petterson remarked, emphasizing the appeal of this unique lifestyle. “Having the ability to completely disconnect from the world and still be connected with our internet and Wi-Fi and invite your friends on board… It really helps your ability to really live this lifestyle and still stay connected with your friends and family." Based on a report by Newsweek 2024-11-14

Two teenage boys from Ottawa were reportedly planning to bomb a pro-Israel rally on Parliament Hill, according to documents obtained by Global News. The two, who are both minors, were arrested by the RCMP in December and February on allegations of plotting an attack against Ottawa’s Jewish community. Though the specific details of the plan weren’t initially disclosed, recent court documents outline new allegations regarding the suspected target. “They are alleged to have formed a plan last fall to violently attack Jewish persons in Ottawa, possibly through the detonation of an explosive device at a pro-Israel rally,” stated the Department of Justice. One of the teens allegedly possessed acetone, oxidizer, and metal ball bearings—all of which are common in the construction of homemade bombs. The plot was reportedly linked to ISIS, also known as DAESH, and according to Canada’s Integrated Terrorism Assessment Centre, it may have been “possibly accelerated” by the Hamas attack on Israel in October 2023. The Department of Justice noted that, while the radicalization of the two teens likely began before the recent Hamas-Israel conflict, one of them reportedly had contact with DAESH overseas. This period also saw increased calls to violence by DAESH in response to the escalating conflict. The claim that a pro-Israel rally was the intended target came up in an application from federal lawyers seeking to withhold sensitive national security information in the teens’ trials. This case highlights a disturbing rise in antisemitic incidents in Canada, including recent shootings targeting Jewish schools. In addition, there has been an uptick in ISIS-related cases, such as the recent arrest of a Pakistani foreign student in Quebec accused of planning a mass shooting at a Jewish center in Brooklyn, New York. Shimon Koffler Fogel, president and CEO of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, told Global News he was unaware of the rally as a target but was not surprised. “It doesn’t come as a surprise,” Fogel said. “And I think it’s consistent with what we have seen across the country, where the violent and radicalized protests that have manifested themselves on our streets are losing all constraints in terms of how far they are prepared to go in order to advance their position.” Fogel expressed disappointment with Canadian law enforcement’s handling of the threats faced by the Jewish community, saying, “They understand the extent to which we are under threat, yet they are not taking all the steps necessary. They are not using the provisions of the Criminal Code in ways that are going to offer protection to those who are at risk.” The father of one of the accused teens, who immigrated from Iraq, claimed the family had warned him to avoid extremist influences and had even arranged for him to meet with an imam. However, posts on the father’s Facebook account reportedly include derogatory references to Jews and Zionists, with one post expressing a desire to eliminate all Israelis. Meanwhile, the co-accused faces charges that include three counts of terrorism, agreeing to commit murder, and attempting to obtain a prohibited firearm. In a report released under the Access to Information Act, the Integrated Terrorism Assessment Centre stated, “The plot involved a reported threat to the Jewish community, which exemplifies how significant international events, amongst other personal grievances, can likely influence an overall path of mobilization.” Based on a report by Global News Canada 2024-11-12

Following a sharp ratings dip during last week’s Election Night coverage, CNN is bracing for sweeping layoffs under new CEO Mark Thompson, who is reportedly targeting high-salaried on-air talent and redundant positions across the organization. According to Puck News, Thompson’s planned layoffs are expected to impact hundreds of CNN employees as he restructures the network’s workforce, focusing on a shift toward a “digital-first” model. CNN has struggled to keep pace with competitors in the cable news arena. While Fox News captured an impressive 10.3 million viewers in prime time on Election Night and MSNBC, anchored by Rachel Maddow, pulled in 6 million viewers, CNN lagged with 5.1 million viewers, according to Nielsen. This marked a significant loss for CNN, which historically dominated election coverage in years past. As part of the reorganization, Thompson may cut back on the network’s highly compensated anchors, such as Anderson Cooper, Erin Burnett, and Kaitlan Collins. Cooper, who hosted the recent Election Night broadcast, is reported to have a contract valued as high as $20 million annually. Burnett’s salary is estimated at $6 million, while Collins earns a reported $3 million. Thompson’s push for budget restructuring could see significant reductions in these salaries as he works to align the network’s finances with a shifting viewership and digital landscape. Further signs of the coming change were evident earlier this week when anchor Chris Wallace announced his departure from CNN, ending a three-year run marked by low ratings and corporate turnover. Wallace, reportedly earning $8.5 million annually, is one of several high-profile figures Thompson has considered asking to accept pay cuts. Additional stars, including Jake Tapper and Wolf Blitzer, may also face compensation adjustments. Thompson, previously the CEO of The New York Times and the BBC, is focusing on adapting CNN’s content production for a more digitally-focused audience. According to sources, the layoffs will target television production teams whose roles are deemed less critical under the new digital-first approach. Reporters and correspondents are expected to take on some of the responsibilities currently handled by producers and production assistants, streamlining workflows and reducing the network’s reliance on traditional television support staff. Additionally, CNN will eliminate redundant roles and, in some cases, reduce or fully dissolve certain divisions. The upcoming changes follow an earlier round of cuts in which CNN laid off approximately 100 employees, or about 3% of its workforce. For many at CNN, these layoffs only add to the anxiety within a work environment described by Puck as “high stress and high anxiety.” The reshuffling at CNN underscores a larger industry trend as media companies face the pressures of declining viewership, changing consumer habits, and the need for cost-effective digital strategies. In a competitive field where audiences have increasingly diverse options for news and information, Thompson’s restructuring efforts aim to give CNN a fighting chance to recover and remain relevant in the evolving landscape of news media. Based on a report by NYP 2024-11-14

Two U.S. Navy destroyers, USS Spruance (DDG-111) and USS Stockdale (DDG-106), were targeted by Houthi forces with a series of missiles and drones as they exited the Red Sea and entered the Gulf of Aden through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, the Pentagon reported on Tuesday. Pentagon Press Secretary Maj. Gen. Patrick Ryder confirmed that Houthi forces launched at least eight drones, five anti-ship ballistic missiles, and three anti-ship cruise missiles at the two destroyers. The U.S. warships successfully intercepted all projectiles, with no reported injuries or damage to either vessel. The incident marks the second attack by Houthi forces on these destroyers, which were also targeted by Houthi missiles in late September, along with the USS Indianapolis (LCS-17). The Houthis, who are aligned with Iran, have increased their missile and drone capabilities in recent years, frequently targeting vessels and other military assets in the region as a part of the broader conflict in Yemen. Brig. Gen. Yahya Sare’e, a spokesman for the Houthis, claimed that the recent attacks were successful. In a post on social media platform X, he also asserted that Houthi forces had attacked the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) in the Arabian Sea. However, Ryder stated he had no information regarding an attack on the Lincoln. According to USNI News' Fleet Tracker, USS Abraham Lincoln was stationed in the Gulf of Aden as of Tuesday. Both Spruance and Stockdale were previously operating independently in the Red Sea under Operation Prosperity Guardian. On Monday, however, the two ships joined the Abraham Lincoln strike group for enhanced regional security. The Bab el-Mandeb Strait is a critical chokepoint connecting the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, making it a strategically significant route for international trade and naval operations. In recent months, tensions in the region have heightened, with Houthis conducting multiple missile and drone strikes in the area, creating additional pressure on U.S. forces to maintain security in key waterways. The Pentagon has yet to release further details, and U.S. Central Command has not issued an official statement on the attack. However, these continued confrontations highlight the ongoing challenges in securing vital maritime routes in a region fraught with political and military instability. Based on a report by US Naval Institute 2024-11-14

A disturbing scene unfolded outside a community theater in Livingston County, Michigan, where demonstrators carrying Nazi flags gathered in protest during a performance of *The Diary of Anne Frank*. The antisemitic demonstration took place outside the American Legion Post 141 in Howell, where the play was being staged, and involved masked individuals who reportedly waved Nazi flags and shouted hateful, racist slurs, according to WXYZ, a CNN affiliate. In addition to Howell, demonstrators were also reported in the nearby town of Fowlerville. Alex Sutliff, who witnessed the scene while driving through Fowlerville with his wife, encountered the group at a stoplight and was shocked by their behavior. “They were saying awful antisemitic things that I don’t even feel comfortable repeating myself,” Sutliff shared with CNN. He described how the group “all stuck their hands up” while chanting “Heil Hitler, Heil Trump.” Sutliff quickly left as the light turned green, calling the police to report the incident as he and his wife circled back to alert the demonstrators that authorities were on their way. Upon hearing this, the demonstrators dispersed, leaving before the police arrived. The incident has sparked concerns among both local residents and the theater group itself. The Fowlerville Community Theatre, responsible for the production, issued a statement acknowledging that the play is intended to reflect the real experiences of those who suffered in the Holocaust. The group emphasized their commitment to portraying these stories with authenticity, adding that the protest outside brought an unexpected element of realism to the production. “On Saturday evening, things became more real than we expected,” the statement read, describing how the presence of the demonstrators offered “a small glimpse of the fear and uncertainty felt by those in hiding.” The theater group also expressed hope that by sharing Anne Frank’s story, they might contribute to preventing such atrocities from recurring. “As a theatre, we want to make people feel and think,” the statement continued. In response to the protest, the Anti-Defamation League’s Michigan regional office condemned the actions, expressing outrage on social media. The ADL described the demonstration as “disgusting,” particularly in light of the way these extremists openly celebrated symbols of hatred. This incident follows other recent acts of hate in Livingston County; just a few months earlier, White supremacist groups staged a march in Howell, located about 40 miles from Detroit. Amid a broader rise in antisemitic incidents, the ADL reported a significant spike in threats against Jews in the U.S., noting a threefold increase in the year since the October 7 attack on Israel by Hamas. This increase is part of a larger trend, with a surge in hate crimes targeting Jews, Muslims, and Arabs in the weeks following the attack. For this Michigan community, the demonstration serves as a sobering reminder of the need for vigilance against hatred. The theater company, undeterred, remains committed to bringing the stories of Holocaust victims to the stage, hoping that empathy and awareness can be kindled even in the face of such adversity. Based on a report by CNN 2024-11-14

A serving Gloucestershire police officer has been arrested in Gloucester on suspicion of a terrorism-related offence, reportedly due to suspected online support for the proscribed organization Hamas. The constable, a man in his 30s, was detained by counter-terrorism officers on Tuesday under the Terrorism Act, specifically on suspicion of offering support to the designated terrorist organization. Gloucestershire Constabulary has confirmed that the alleged support centers on the officer’s online activities. Hamas, an Islamist militant group based in Gaza, is designated as a terrorist organization in the UK, the European Union, the United States, and numerous other countries. This designation makes it illegal to show support for or be affiliated with the group within the UK. The organization has been involved in an ongoing conflict with Israel, which intensified significantly following a major attack on October 7 of last year. Following the arrest, specialist officers launched searches as part of the ongoing investigation, focusing on securing digital evidence, including seizing devices and conducting searches of a vehicle and an associated residence. Assistant Chief Constable Arman Mathieson of Gloucestershire Constabulary addressed community concerns over the arrest, acknowledging the gravity of the allegations. He emphasized, however, that the investigation remains in its early stages and that the public should avoid premature conclusions. Mathieson explained that the primary aim of the searches is to gather relevant digital devices for analysis, underscoring that the arrest facilitates a “prompt and effective” inquiry into the matter. The Gloucestershire police remain focused on conducting a thorough investigation while reassuring the public that any potential misconduct will be rigorously addressed. Based on a report by Sky News 2024-11-15

The news that President-elect Donald Trump would select Representative Elise Stefanik as ambassador to the United Nations sparked intense reactions at the UN, with diplomats reeling at the prospect. Stefanik, a Republican from New York, is widely recognized as a strong advocate for Trump’s America First policy and someone who could tackle the persistent anti-Americanism and antisemitism that pervades the UN system. Stefanik’s initial task will focus on the UN Security Council, where the United States, as a permanent member, possesses both veto power and the authority to call special sessions. Her approach is expected to differ from that of the Biden administration, which often hesitated to wield its veto, considering its use a failure in diplomacy. This reluctance placed the United States on the defensive, while nations like Russia and China, unafraid to exercise their veto power, pushed their agendas forward. With Stefanik in the role, the US is likely to embrace a more assertive approach, prepared to veto proposals that threaten American interests. In this adversarial environment, Stefanik’s strategy may go beyond defense. She could leverage her convening power to take a proactive stance, introducing resolutions that put pressure on nations antagonistic to the United States. Both Trump and his reported pick for secretary of state, Senator Marco Rubio, are likely to see Stefanik as the central figure in their political opposition to America’s adversaries. Stefanik’s work could involve highlighting the malign activities of countries such as China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. Through strategically introduced resolutions, she might force China and Russia to openly veto measures that expose their activities and those of their allies. For example, instead of waiting to block yet another anti-Israel resolution, Stefanik could propose designating Hamas as a terrorist organization. This move would force Beijing and Moscow to use their veto power in defense of a terrorist group. Stefanik’s strategy could also extend to exposing Iranian-linked groups, such as the Houthis, who have launched attacks on international shipping in the Red Sea, as well as addressing crimes against humanity committed by China and Russia. Should Trump resume his “maximum pressure” campaign against Iran, Stefanik would be pivotal in pushing for the United Kingdom, France, and Germany to join the United States in reactivating multilateral sanctions on Iran. Triggering the “snapback” of these sanctions before their expiration would reinstate UN embargoes on Iran’s conventional and missile capabilities and reestablish the prohibition against nuclear enrichment, all while circumventing potential Russian or Chinese vetoes. Another significant aspect of Stefanik’s agenda could be the strategic use of American financial contributions across the UN to counter Chinese influence, reduce antisemitism, and ensure that funding does not inadvertently support terrorist organizations. Based on a report by NYP 2024-11-14

Inflammatory off topic troll post removed @pattayasan

Troll post removed @blaze master read the credible links provided in the topic