Chomper Higgot

Mamdani can’t win election solely on the ‘Muslim vote’. He can win election be addressing the everyday concerns of New Yorkers.

Contradicting Pam Bondi’s clear statement that the list was on her desk.

All you need now is to disprove the other part of Tug’s post that you declared wrong. The bit about “ he [Trump] wouldn’t put any tariffs on his pal.“ We expected an answer tomorrow, but Trump is having another bout of dither and delay, his latest vacillation coming up with August 1. Do stick around.

Excellent, Biden put tarrifs (sanctions) on Putin, Trump has not. Although he has argued for removing sanctions on Russia: https://www.forbes.com/sites/stuartanderson/2025/03/30/trump-wants-more-trade-with-russia-but-less-with-everyone-else/

It might. Assuming there’s only one copy.

Adjusting their internal head programming takes a little while. They’ll show up as soon as they’ve received their download of the latest firmware 25.07.320epst (Talking points, deflections and whataboutary).

That’s the title, read the OP.

Pam Bondi already confirmed there was a Epstein list and that it was sitting on her desk. The issue is not what anonymous member of this Internet discussion forum opined during the period in which information was being withheld. The issue is the about face of the Administration. The DOJ is very clearly lying and we have Pam Bondi to thank for confirmation that they are.

The subject of the thread is the client list.

Can you please provide a link to the source if that screenshot Jonny. Here’s how it’s done: https://www.axios.com/2025/04/02/trump-tariffs-russia-ukraine-ceasefire

Here’s what needs explaining: https://thehill.com/homenews/5158153-jeffrey-epstein-client-list-bondi-review/amp/ And now ‘it doesn’t exist’. Next up, and it will turn up here, Trump supporters, both foreign and domestic, will start pretending they never had any interest in the Epstein Client list. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/jeffrey-epstein-files-list-pam-bondi-trump-maga-b2716554.html

I agree, though I would extend that to assaulting any Emergency Service personnel or staff tasked with public safety duties.

Solicitors make statements on behalf of their clients. Get over the problem you have with people having the right to legal representation.

The defendants made the allegations, they are e titled to legal representation. Your vengeance fantasy doesn’t negate those rights.

And yet I provided a link to the actual facts that the Charges came following the IOPC investigation.