Jump to content

dfdgfdfdgs

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    821
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by dfdgfdfdgs

  1. 9 hours ago, mrblonde said:

    What is Samae San Island like

     

    There are 2 islands right next to each other.  Koh Samae San and Koh Kham.  I think the below (in bold) applies for both but I realised once I'd written it that it might just apply for Koh Kham and not Koh Samae San.  I think both - the navy in this area seems to discriminate against foreigners a lot.  There's an old war vessel tourist attraction in Sattahip (HTMS Chakri Naruebet) which Thais are allowed to visit (for free) and foreigners are completely banned...  Can you imagine that in Europe/US?

     

    Double-pricing for the boat (foreigners pay double) and you're only allowed there if you are with a Thai!  So effectively if you weren't already taking a Thai, you have to pay 3 times what a Thai pays...

     

    Worth avoiding for that reason alone.  I looked at swimming there...

    • Like 1
  2. 1 hour ago, mstevens said:

    And if the person who is at fault simply doesn't have any money, the hospital has to provide free treatment for which it will not be able to recover the costs while those of us who have the money to pay for treatment / insurance have to wait or possibly even miss out because the doctors and nurses and attending to those who cannot pay.  Can't say I like the sound of that.

    If they have insurance the nurses will still be attending to them, so what difference does it make.  You could make the claim that you would be paying a premium for their lack of insurance, but not that you will be kept waiting longer because of them being there.

  3. 11 hours ago, DavisH said:

    Hopefully other islands will be given some sort of sanctuary status

     

    Lots of national park islands, Koh Surin, Koh Similan, Laem Son, Koh Rang, Angthong Marine Park, the ones near Koh Lipe...

     

    But people don't want to stay there because they want their luxury hotels, deckchairs, watersports, seafood restaurants on the beach etc.  So most people daytrip them and they're busy 11am-3pm and deserted before and after.

  4. Koh Larn is a sacrificial island.  There are simply too many tourists in Thailand for the number of inhabited islands to be able to cope with them (whilst remaining something of the paradises that they are marketed as).  So all the Chinese and Russians choose Koh Larn (for whatever reason) and Koh Larn just has to take the daily abuse it gets for the sake of all the other islands.

  5. 5 hours ago, xylophone said:

    You use the plural and I was referring to one specific event, and anyway I have been here five years already and even though the current Aircon was okay, I wanted a Mitsubishi inverter Aircon as I like to keep the temperature on 22° C at night, whereas the old one was struggling to do this. Not only that I save on electricity bills.

     

    You compared your way of doing things with the OP and they are complete opposites.  You have no problem giving things to people for free, whereas the OP wants his aircon.  Clearly when people are getting things out of you without having to do anything to earn them, they are less likely to moan and argue with you.  Whereas in the OPs case, the landlord wants something, they are not getting it as easily as they would with you, and thus an argument has ensued.

  6. 1 hour ago, xylophone said:

    I have owned two houses here and rented a few apartments and have had absolutely no problems with the rentals, but then perhaps I'm different to you, and I say this because if I install anything in my apartment, such as a new aircon, which I have just done, I asked for permission to do so and tell the owner that when I leave, he can keep the aircon unit, but only if it is my decision to leave.

    Well of course you won't have any problems with landlords when you are giving them 1000s of baht (10,000s of thousands?) worth of free equipment for no apparent reason...

    • Like 1
  7. 8 hours ago, Get Real said:

    Who decides what´s right or wrong? You as a single person, or structured law and order made for take care and control a country and it´s population?

    Every individual of reasonable age and sound mind has the mental capacity to decide for themselves what is right and wrong except certain people with mental conditions such as sociopaths who are less able empathise and determine between the two.  That doesn't necessarily mean they will never do wrong things of course.

  8. 8 hours ago, Get Real said:

    Yes, there is. Every single person have an obligation to obey the law, and the one that breaks it, shall face punishment for that offense. Sure, you´re not wearing a wig?

    There is no obligation to follow the law.  If there were an obligation, there would be no existence of punishment, because nobody would break it.  Everybody has a choice whether they want to follow the law or ignore it.

×
×
  • Create New...