BobBKK

8 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

That doesn't mean that the stabbing or killing was premeditated.  (It doesn't actually prove that the attack was premeditated.)

 

He could have gone there to confront her with the item, then become enraged upon seeing her and then made the decision to attack.  Likewise with the knife, he could have had it for another reason, then used it once his rage increased.

 

Very hard to prove something is premeditated.

 
Whatever - he did it - 99.99999% of us live a long life and do not kill or rape people. Personally, I have not an ounce of sympathy for those that do.



 

They are so entitled... glad when they are all gone.

1 minute ago, Lacessit said:

I'm a realist. Of course it's to do with the security I provide. That said, there's a lot of affection on both sides.

 

Your last sentence reminds me of an old Aussie saying:

 

"If my auntie had balls, she'd be my uncle".

 To be fair, it IS an exchange, and I wish you no ill will. I date much younger girls, and I understand it for what it is. I am always respectful, kind and considerate as I'm sure you are. Good luck and be happy and who cares if things were different what would happen - it is what it is.

Just now, Liverpool Lou said:

Doesn't he have to appear in court and be proven guilty before you are able to announce the sentence?

 Yes, after due process and CCTV evidence, etc.   then hang him and all murderers alike  

15 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Free abortions and vasectomies at the Democrat convention. 

 If they had the vasectomies first, they would not need the abortions.  I read they were 'fully booked' I wonder whether they will offer any transitions?  Come to the Dem convention as a man and leave as a woman! 

hang him

I think she's just an ordinary person and not particularly bad or anything. But she's not POTUS material and will be out of her depth should she keep the momentum and actually win.

He was a lawyer?  jeeze 

9 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Why not? It's a relationship of mutual benefit. If it takes me five minutes to put my socks on, and her only 30 seconds, it saves me time. You should see the CAT scan of my spine.

 

You think I am not a free man? Getting snarky, aren't we?

 

I know I will die solvent, because I manage my money well. How about you?

 
I agree—it's a mutual benefit—so we agree on something! Who cares? It's an exchange, and I understand codependency, but if you are both happy, why not?  

1 minute ago, Lacessit said:

You need help for that inferiority complex. Do you have anyone that actually gives a sh!t about you?

 Aww, I'm sure she loves you very much, and it has nothing to do with your money and security. There do you feel better now?  I'm quite sure if you were equals in age and opportunities, she'd pick you for sure! 

This is a strange topic—a better one would be, 'Is Crypto going downwards?' The answer is NO, but as it's pioneering, it is a rocky road. The ability to eventually lose banks and have instant, secure transactions, has to be a part of the future imho.

I don't like Trump very much, and if I were American, I'd vote JFK. However, I loathe the pathetic liberals much more than Trump, so if I HAD to choose between the two, I'd vote for Trump. At least he says he will try and stop the Gaza and Ukraine wars - not a peep from the Messiah Harris, just Biden's liberal rhetoric.  

35 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

My GF used to walk about 2km to school in bare feet, because her family could not afford shoes. She's honest and hardworking, dedicated to taking care of me.

 

I don't think  you can tar every Thai with the same brush, unless you move in entirely different circles to mine.

 

I can only conclude your acquaintances back West, who don't have 1 million baht in assets, must have p!ssed it all away against a wall, or in a betting shop.

 Yeah, I bet you love her taking care of you and devoting her entire life to your comfort (you pay the bills). What an ego!

Who cares? We are not here for their intelligence, are we? I find most, not all, Thais pretty dumb - especially about international affairs, history, etc.  Gob nai kala!

1 hour ago, Danderman123 said:

The polls changed.

 

https://elections2024.thehill.com/wisconsin/harris-trump-wisconsin/

 

 

 But you understand, I believe, that she is on a bounce due to her boss being forced out despite saying he was the ONLY one who could beat Trump. I'd expect her to get 3 or 4 points just because of this fanfae and her Messiah status right now.

18 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

The statement I was responding to was that the polls were wrong in 2016.

 

I explained that the polls were right.

 

Do you disagree?

 I disagree STRONGLY - it was not about the popular vote. The polls said she'd win 300 electoral votes and be POTUS - we have all the evidence. Most posters admitted they were wrong, but YOU think they were right.

On 8/17/2024 at 11:22 AM, newnative said:

     Don't I wish 'the American voters will decide'.  The 'American voters' decided for Clinton in 2016, to the tune of 2.8 million more votes, not 'very tight' at all.  A blowout.  The EC, unfortunately for the country, 'decided' that election and we ended up with the worst presidency in US history.   

     Almost happened again in 2020, when the blowout was 7 million votes more in favor of Biden.  Again, not 'very tight' at all with the actual voters.  If you want an actual 'tight' race, try Bush-Gore, with a less than 600,000 vote difference, in favor of Gore.   Or Kennedy-Nixon, with less than 113,000 votes in favor of Kennedy.

 I observe you don't understand the electoral system - if you don't like it - fight to change it. 

On 8/17/2024 at 1:46 PM, Danderman123 said:

Trump lost the popular vote in 2016. The polls were right.

 
It was not about popular vote - it was about States and you KNOW IT

what?? Do they want US to pay?   cremate and send the box jeeze

3 hours ago, mancub said:

Agreed. I think the poster bob BBK has mis-interpreted the term "payable years " as being mandatory instead of  available for voluntary contributions ( if reqd). 

 No I understand its voluntary and I want to pay - letter says I cannot GG says I can up to 2026. Waiting email response.

2 hours ago, sandyf said:

If you want to read the GG that way, up to you.

The letter is more likely the reality.

 Elsewhere in the GG I can assure you it says so EXPLICITLY and gives dates until 2026

7 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

sheeple who refuse to think

 

When you have nothing call those you don't agree with sheeple. 

 aww Brian I was just accused of burrowing my head and took it in good humour - Hare today gone tomorrow!

On 8/13/2024 at 12:31 PM, Alpha84 said:

The evidence is all there. Beyond the poles there are also various other reliable metrics. It's clear she is winning:

 

 

 His predications in 2016 were great too haha