Bert got kinky

7 minutes ago, transam said:

Really, we must have met to know that ...?   ????........????

We may have.

Who do you use for your visa agent?

6 minutes ago, transam said:

Both banned....................????

And????????

6 minutes ago, sipi said:

The good old days SC.

I won't mention my favourite four.

They know who they are....

Actually, I will drop a few names, without actually dropping their names.

Rumak, big Pete from CM, Wayne, the Canadian, the Greek.....

Smokie & Blether???

Just now, transam said:

Sadly you still miss my point, and go off on a booze tangent, now accusing me of complaining because I couldn't buy a beer during Buddhist day, what is the matter with you, I don't need to buy beer on a Buddhist day..????

 

It is clear that I must make allowances for you, so you crack on.....????

Laters Terry.

Just now, transam said:

It looks like you have a major comprehension problem, or just a nasty streak.

 

So what is the "go have another drink Tranny", all about....?

 

Stop making excuses if you have a problem.....????

It looks like you have a major comprehension problem, or just a nasty streak.

No, I just understand and agree with the law.

You have been in Thailand for a long time, you should understand this by now.

So what is the "go have another drink Tranny", all about....?

You are moaning that you weren't allowed to buy alcohol during the Buddhist holiday, well now you can, so drink away.

4 minutes ago, Bangkok Barry said:

And then he denied writing it. Funny.

Are you still stalking me.

Very bad form.

Just now, transam said:

Your wife beater shirt comment aimed at me was real and noted by me and other readers, but not worth reporting, because I laughed at your daftness......????

 

So you (and a few other slow board members) weren't clued up enough to understand that there was a typo in the post.

Go and have another drink Tranny.

32 minutes ago, KannikaP said:

No.

Or the long answer:

Heck, no!

Just now, Liverpool Lou said:

Actually, you did, though obviously it was a typo...

"

Agreed but the poster was well aware that it was a typo.

11 minutes ago, Bangkok Barry said:

Yah!!! I haven't seen a 'go back to your own country' post for quite a while now. Thank you for reviving the old and idiotic chestnut. You even call the poster a wifebeater. Well done for adding to your ignorance and stupidity. Not a bad effort in just two sentences.

I did not call the poster (transam) a wifebeater, Where did you get that from???????

If you don't understand a post, ask about it.

Feel free to apologize for your false and made up accusation against me.

18 minutes ago, transam said:

As I said before, you cannot see the point, which has nothing to do with a daily beer fix, it is about one's freedom, and not being controlled on one's personal consumption of anything via religion.....................????

 

But, if you think it is OK, Reverend, that's your prerogative, this is a chat forum.......????

 

 

The problem is that I can see the point.

In Thailand it is illegal to sell alcohol on certain dates,

The law is very clear and everyone with half a brain knew that Tuesday (August 1st) was one of these days.

If you break the law you could be prosecuted.

Now, do you see the point?

29 minutes ago, transam said:

In my multi religion country, folk can drink beer, wine etc on any day of the year....................

Well if you are so dependent on alcohol, go back there .

Don't forget to pack you Chang wifebeater.

24 minutes ago, steven100 said:

yeah Bert .... did you remember to get your cannabis fix yesterday  ... you'll be on the heroin next.  Lol

did you remember to get your cannabis fix yesterday 

Yeah got my cannabis fix, but only because cannabis sales are legal yesterday.

If it was against the law to buy cannabis on a Thai holiday, UI definitely would not do that.

you'll be on the heroin next.  Lol

Wow, H is legal now?

Anyone got any links to sites selling it?

23 minutes ago, transam said:

I think you have missed the point, but never mind, eh....

No, I am very much on point.

Just because you don't like a law, doesn't mean that the law is wrong.

If you can't survive for one day without your alcohol fix, you are the problem, not Thai laws.

22 minutes ago, transam said:

Nothing to do with "laws" of the country, it is a religious "law", being told no booze on religious days.

This country has many religions, but one tells others what they can or cannot do.

In my country, there are a zillion religions, but none control the populace freedom of what they can or cannot consume...????

So your country has never had half day closing on Sundays? (also religious).

Jeeez, seems like the alcoholics can't go one day without their fix.

30 minutes ago, KannikaP said:

If I was keeping the property well in order, clean, tidy etc, I would not mind, even if I was not there. It's HIS property.

But of course, if anything went missing or got damaged that would be different matter. Solution: Keep the place tidy and video it every week/clean, do NOT leave any valuables hanging about.

do NOT leave any valuables hanging about.

Or horse sized vibrating rubber toys, or an industrial sized vat of KY jelly, etc.

29 minutes ago, billd766 said:

How so? It is his property and they are paying no rent.

 

If you feel so strongly, then you take them to court.

 

It is the owners business and not yours.

How so? It is his property and they are paying no rent.

Where did the poster  'J Branche' say that his tenants were paying no rent?

He simply stated that he uses his maintenance card to access his tenants property, there was no mention of non payment of rent.

If you were renting a property, would you be ok with your landlord entering your property without your permission or presence?

It is the owners business and not yours.

I'm voicing an opinion on a forum in the same way that you are.

Therefore, let me state to you, my opinion is my business and not yours.

Just now, BenStark said:

Using the maintenance card means using the excuse of needed maintenance, so tenant will be present.

 

How many houses do you know that are accessible with a card?

And that's not what was stated, He stated that he used the card to inspect the property.

If the tenant was present, why would he need to use the card?

Just now, KannikaP said:

And if the tenant is wrecking the place, the owner should have the right to go in, assess the damage, get some money if possible, and kick the 'douche' out.

And if the tenant is wrecking the place.

If the tenant is wrecking the place, the owner should be able to go in and inspect the place but only with the tenant present.

The poster stated 'As a landlord I use the Maintenance card to access and inspect my properties'.

The fact that he is using his maintenance card to access suggests that the tenant is in fact not present and therefore, most likely unaware.

Note that the poster did not mention any special circumstances for the illegal entry, just that he does this to inspect his properties.

If you were renting and your landlord searched your house without you being present and without your permission, would you just accept this?

I agree but this is not what the poster