Jump to content

NotReallyHere

Member
  • Posts

    335
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by NotReallyHere

  1. 2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

    The only way he doesn't understand faith is if you haven't actually understood anything he has written over the years this thread has been running. I don't agree with everything he writes, but I certainly accept he knows about faith.

     

    We are not supposed to use the laugh emoji to convey that we think a post is bonkers, so I'm quoting you to use :cheesy: in the post.

     

     

    He is comparing faith to quantum physics.  He doesn't understand the scientific method and how it distinguishes facts from theories.  That's all I need to know.  If you have been foolish enough to read his nonsense for years, it's your own fault.  I'm not the "bonkers" one.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  2. 1 hour ago, Sunmaster said:

    Not at all. The same way I don't feel I'm stupid if I don't understand quantum entanglement. Some do understand it and I don't have a problem with that either. 

    More nonsense.  You can't compare the flowery nonsense you wrote concerning "intelligent design" and "understanding it" with quantum physics.  The fact that you think you can speaks volumes.  You don't understand the simple concept of faith and that it isn't based on anything that can be proven.

    • Like 1
  3. 2 minutes ago, mauGR1 said:

    I'm not offended at all, but i guess you're not answering my question.

    Up to you ????

    Another nonsensical comment.  Your question doesn't make sense because I didn't call anyone any names.  Therefore, I can't answer it.

     

    This is typical of this site.  People with weak positions (like yourself) keep changing the subject until they feel like they have "won".

     

    My original point stands.  "Intelligent design" makes no sense, unless, of course, you choose to redefine it so that it says nothing about any "intelligence" in the design.

     

    Some believers with weak faith feel the need to defend indefensible positions at all costs.

     

    Probably too many missionaries on here.  This thread is what one would expect if one were foolish enough to open the door when they came knocking.

     

    • Like 1
  4. 2 minutes ago, Sunmaster said:

    The lack of comprehension is entirely your own doing. I can't do anything about that, I'm afraid. 

    Your comment indirectly says I'm stupid, but I don't feel the least bit insulted by it.  It's as if someone said 2+2=5. and I replied "that doesn't make sense".  To which the original poster said my "lack of comprehension is my own doing".  I can accept that.  No problem.

    • Like 2
  5. 19 minutes ago, mauGR1 said:

    Ok, and what's your plan to make yourself look " less foolish"?

    .. or do you think that calling other people names is enough?

    I didn't call any particular person a fool.  If you feel indirectly insulted by comments like mine, you are probably reading and participating in the wrong type of thread.  There are plenty of threads about visas you can read that won't leave you feeling offended.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  6. 8 minutes ago, Sunmaster said:

    It wasn't meant to be an explanation of intelligent design. You asked a question  about male nipples, as if that would disprove intelligent design. I simply answered that. 

     

     

     

    In my opinion, it does disprove intelligent design.

     

    What's your definition of "intelligent design".

     

    You'll probably just google it.  Surely someone has tweaked the definition of intelligent design to allow for all the faults in human design.

     

     

    • Like 1
  7. 56 minutes ago, Sunmaster said:

    No need to read the whole thread. A simple Google search will provide the answer.

     

    Men have nipples because nipples develop in the womb before embryos become distinctly male or female. So by the time a Y chromosome kicks in to distinguish a fetus as male, the nipples have already secured their place.

    That isn't an explanation of "intelligent design".  It's just an explanation of what occurs.

     

    "Intelligent" design would have eliminated redundant physiological body parts regardless of when they occurred in our embryonic development.

     

    Men can get breast cancer (ductal carcinoma).  No breasts, no cancer.  Sounds like an intelligent design.

     

    Aside:  Very strange that you would choose Spock for your profile picture.  Unless it's meant mockingly.

     

     

    • Thanks 1
  8. Just FYI for those who are interested.  ASEANNOW deleted my earlier post.  I probably linked to a site I was not allowed to link to.  My apologies.

     

    The Thai media link I posted earlier had many pictures of her at the airport surrounded by police.

     

    If you're interested in seeing the pictures, you can plug " บินกลับแล้ว! ตร.ส่งหญิงไทย  " into your search browser and will likely find the article.

     

    Two interesting things I noticed.

     

    1. The police were all wearing "Tourist Police" windbreakers.  Why Tourist Police?  Has she been out of the country that long that she needs English speaking escorts?

     

    2. She boarded at the First Class/Business Class gate.  Hope she was uncomfortable anyway.

     

    She's on the plane 4 days later than the Thai police promised, but at least they got it done.

     

     

    • Thanks 1
  9. 4 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:

    I do understand.
     

    If a child reports a gun in the bathroom, you as the adult check.

     

    You do not send them back with another 8 year old to check it out. 


    It’s not difficult to follow such simple procedures. 

    Sorry, this was my attempt at humor.  Maybe you have to be from Texas to understand the humor.  Texans are a unique breed.

     

    Not seriously debating the correctness of what you have written.

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Thumbs Up 1
  10. 14 hours ago, Kaopad999 said:

    That's really interesting!  so what that means is that his account has had recent activity. I'm starting to think that it's possible he had his Youtube chnanel demonetized and decied to quit. I know Youtube brouhgt in some new rules a couple of years ago to make their platform more famly friendly.   But even then with a follwing of 1 million people, you'd think he'd at least let his lotyal subscribers and fans know. Myabe that Youtube short  upload was a test to see if he could remonetize his channel?  Yes, i did send him an email and many other people have but no respsonse. 
    I guess time will tell.

    Aside from not being a crypto guy, I'm also no social media expert.  That being said, I did notice that his account is listed on socialblade.com and they report he is still making income.  I think socialblade.com is one of the biggest social media account trackers.  I would hope they screen the accounts for monetization before posting predicted income.  I'm not familiar with monetization policies, but I hope he would get something if they are showing advertisements before, during or after his videos.  I use an adblocker, so I never see any ads.  I can't verify the presence of ads.

  11. I'm not a crypto guy, but I noticed he posted his BTC account address in the description box of his YouTube channel.

     

    Went to Blockchain.com and entered his address.  It looks like after a long period of inactivity, a small net transaction out was posted yesterday.  If I'm reading it correctly, 4 transactions in, one transaction out with a net decrease of the account of $14.55.  I assume that means he's still alive.  Someone else could have access to his account, of course.  No way to be sure.

     

    Did you already email him or send him a DM on his Twitter account?

     

    image.png.cf98f8aa6be7c23897aa073d20a47b65.png

     

    • Thumbs Up 1
    • Haha 1
  12. 16 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

    I appreciate your acknowledgement that, at least, she was arrested, though, albeit the location may have been misquoted by sources and I don't believe the source I quoted has any less credibilty than yours. 

     

    By the way in order to be extradited the subject has to be detained and detainment is arrest.

    Wrong.  Your English comprehension skills and spelling are as bad as your research skills.

     

    And now we also have to call your judgement into question, if you place TE's credibility (note the spelling) on the same level as ABC News, CBS News, AP News, etc., despite the three blatant inaccuracies I pointed out.

     

     

     

  13. 23 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

    "The 57-year-old woman was arrested last week by the Royal Thai Police in Chonburi and appeared at a press conference beside Deputy National Police Commissioner Surachate Hakparn who told reporters that she was now in contact with US officials and would be extradited".

     

    https://aseannow.com/topic/1286917-thai-woman-faces-federal-charges-for-fleeing-the-united-states-after-michigan-hit-and-run-death/

     

    Comment only highlights your lack of research skills and those of the Thai Examiner (which is the news source chosen by ASEAN NOW).

     

    My assessment stands.

     

    Oh, and another falsehood, she was not arrested in Chonburi.

     

     

    • Haha 1
  14. 14 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

    Yes, it is the point.  She was reported as being apprehended pending extradition to the US.  That you claim not to have seen the report  in the press is irrelevant.  

    Oh, and here's a nice quote.  Google it yourself...  ABC News, CBS News, AP News, NY Post, The Detroit News, The Oakland Press (Tubtim's hometown paper) even the goddamned LaotianTimes.

     

    We did not arrest her. After she knew the facts, she showed the intention to accept the punishment in the U.S.,” he said. “This will be a good example for Thai society.”

     

    Get your <deleted> together, Lou...

     

     

  15. 12 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

    "The 57-year-old woman was arrested last week by the Royal Thai Police in Chonburi and appeared at a press conference beside Deputy National Police Commissioner Surachate Hakparn who told reporters that she was now in contact with US officials and would be extradited". 

    To prove me wrong you quote an unreliable news source (the Thai Examiner).  The TE stays she fled four days after the accident.  Wrong.  She fled two days after the accident (January 3rd).  The TE states she was "arrested last week" (which you so conveniently put in bold font).  Wrong, she was apprehended by the police the day prior to the news report (dateline 16 February).

     

    Believe what you want, but you're not proving me wrong by quoting a clearly false news report.

  16. 2 hours ago, Tropposurfer said:

    Ahh the joys of smoking;

    Setting fire to your home, blood pressure, heart disease, wrinkly leathery skin, a whole raft of fatal cancers, the foulest breath, stinking up enclosed spaces you frequent, and those you pass through (like Linus shedding his dirt as he went about), gum diseases, yellow diseased teeth, passing on the cancerous ingredients via passive smoking exchange.

    What a joy! ????

    You forgot erectile dysfunction...

×
×
  • Create New...