Jump to content
ASEANNOW Official TikTok account is now LIVE! -Follow Us! ×

Sujo

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    7,955
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sujo

  1. On 3/18/2021 at 5:22 PM, muzley said:

    Wasn't WAPO the paper that called Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi the leader of ISIS who Trump took out "an austere religious scholar"!! What a joke of a publication!! Good to see them grovel in a retraction. Hope they get sued with all the other fake news media like NYT, CNN, MSNBC etc like with the Covington kids.

    Its ok, his lawyer now admits she was lying. Saying no reasonable person would believe what she said. 

     

    So when it comes to actual evidence and saying under oath, as usual, it falls apart.

     

    https://www.9news.com.au/world/sidney-powell-donald-trump-election-lawsuit-defamation-dominion-voting-systems-us-politics/b0f93c3c-d228-46ec-8ddb-62a1087c9cd0

    • Thanks 2
  2. Speaking of trump. He is still saying he won. I wonder if his new platform will be still spreading the lie.

     

    it seems when it comes to actually saying that in court even his lawyer has disowned the claim.

     

    No reasonable person would believe her, she claims in court docs. Oh dear, hahahaha.

     

    oh donald, please on your new platform you will post the truth.

     

    https://www.9news.com.au/world/sidney-powell-donald-trump-election-lawsuit-defamation-dominion-voting-systems-us-politics/b0f93c3c-d228-46ec-8ddb-62a1087c9cd0

     

     

    • Like 1
  3. 7 hours ago, Old Croc said:

    Yes, she has every right to claim victimization from that film decades later because a producer suggested she bang her co-star to add spice to the film.

     

    She replied, "what do you think I am, I'll just stick to showing my vagina to the world. and when I'm in my mid sixties I'll ignore all the fame and money I made from that film and blame everyone else for what I did."

    Do you understand what you just said?

    she agreed to a part in a movie knowing what was required in the movie.

     

    she didnt sign up for having to have actual sex for whoever someone said she should.

     

    Its not a porn movie, hence she turned it down. But she shouldnt have been asked to do it in the first place.

     

    Its like you agreeing to do a movie to show your bits. But the producer then says you have to do it with the co star. 

     

    Why do you think thats acceptable?

    • Like 1
    • Sad 1
  4. 2 hours ago, Jeffr2 said:

    Yeah.  I use to like CNN.  Not now.  Fox went off the rails during the Trump reign of terror.

     

    Now, mainly online sites.  Nothing live.  Sadly.

    I enjoyed cnn during the trump joke years.

     

    Now its not interesting. All covid in US and since im not there it doesnt interest me. Today all about the wacko shootout. Thats understandable but not hours on end with the reports on it.

     

    I dont watch fox anymore, too many crazies like hanity and tucker.

     

    Al jazeera intrrnational is quite good.

    • Like 2
  5. 19 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

    Good to see a definitive definition, thanks Jeff.

     

    But on close scrutiny, and I quote from your link, it finds hate crimes are-

     

    "A hate crime (also known as a bias-motivated crime or bias crime)[1] is a prejudice-motivated crime which occurs when a perpetrator targets a victim because of their membership (or perceived membership) of a certain social group or race.

    Examples of such groups can include, and are almost exclusively limited to ethnicity, disability, language, nationality, physical appearance, religion, gender identity or sexual orientation."

     

    So mocking somebody for their physical appearance ie orange complexion or small hands or mocking hairstyle or obesity is a HATE CRIME. Yet I have read members here mocking somebody for this exact thing. All one way though, I never saw any poster mock anyone for being of dark color for example. Any explanation for how the left can carry out hate crimes daily with no penalty?

     And then it concludes mocking someone on the basis of their ethnicity is a hate crime. I saw many many posts here mocking the former first lady for this. Starting to notice a real pattern now.

    And mocking somebody for a disability is a hate crime. Yet I read again many many times here posts continually mocking the former President for his bone spur disability. That, once again, is a hate crime.

     

     How can it be hate crimes are alive and well and flourishing on this forum? Very very worrying would you not agree Jeff?

    Its not a hate crime to call the former guy an orange buffoon. 

    He also doesnt have bone spurs.

     

    No one mocked melania for her ethnicity.

    • Like 1
  6. 1 minute ago, Old Croc said:

    I could have a good guess and I'm sure many in the industry and press already know. 

    The Identities of people named in this way virtually never remain secret.

     

    Guess what, I just confirmed my guess with a 1 minute google search!

     

    Doesnt matter. She never named him. She can refuse to identify the co star and its still just a guess. Also it wasnt really to do with the co star, it was the producer that said she should.

     

    He deserves tp be outed for wanting her to do that. 

    • Sad 1
×
×
  • Create New...