Saint Nick

19 hours ago, Mr Meeseeks said:

They will have to find something to do as there will be no tourism for months. 

 

The government will likely need to support taxpayers by offering bailouts.

 

Businesses will go to the wall, especially those that were over-leveraged, pay rents and are in debt.

 

No point even discussing tourism as it isn't going to happen even if the govt. decided to open up the borders, which we now know, going on the panic that the Egyptian soldier and Sudanese diplomats have caused, is not happening for many months to come. 

"...find something to do..." as in ...what exactly?

"The government will...need to support..." we have seen how well that worked out before, haven't we!

If they are going to react like that, with every Covid- case found, this country is <deleted>...doomed for all eternity and we are straight back on the way into the age of hunters and gatherers!

Even if that is the case and it would be relevant to anything...does that make the subject at hand "better"?

2 minutes ago, Sailboat said:

I agree murderers, rapist, pedophiles, progressives are all humans.

I hope, you are trying to be funny...which really needs some practizing on your side!

3 minutes ago, Logosone said:

There is a very clear and documented connection between the gay rights movement and the movement to legalise paedophilia. You may read about it here:

 

https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/gay-activists-in-germany-silent-on-alliance-with-pedophiles-in-1980s-a-919119.html

 

Gay politicians are on record for arguing in favour of legalising paedophilia.

 

How can you say there is no link?

 

 

Heterosexual people, politicians etc also have been arguing for the legalisation of pedophilia!

There are sick people everywhere and they come from all walks of society!

Coraloation is is not causation and context matters!

Homosexuals, transsexuals, pansexuals...whatever...are human beings and citizens and should therefore have all human rights and civil rights!

Not that hard, really!

10 minutes ago, Logosone said:

Well there has been a historic and clear link between the gay movement and the movement to legalise paedophilia.

 

The Spiegel has uncovered this link in an investigative feature, you can read here:

 

https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/gay-activists-in-germany-silent-on-alliance-with-pedophiles-in-1980s-a-919119.html

 

The alliance between the gay movement and the movement to legalise paedophilia is of course largely ignored by those supporting the gay agenda. However it is a very real, well documented historical fact.

 

So it is legitimate to ask, what is the effect of giving legitimacy to the gay lifestyle by legalising gay marriage, in terms of those sexual preferences still considered mental illnesses or criminal.

 

Again, how does a country benefit by legalising gay marriage? What are the consequences?

Jesus man...just say, what you want to say and we are done with it!

There is no whatsoever connection between pdeophilia and homosexuality, just because some homesexuals are also pedophiles!

There is no "gay lifestyle" and it sure is has nothing to do with mental illness or criminality- at least not more or less, than with a "heterosexual lifestyle"!

16 minutes ago, Sailboat said:

Yes, even the mentally ill should be allowed to have anal sex without persecution and of course raise children. 

Abortion should be extended to age 17, with the communities right to choose. The right to deny the free speech of anyone that triggers us/liberals/democrats in anyway.

Progressivism is wonderful and if you don't agree we will destroy you, how dare you!!! 

 

Under what rock did you crawl out of?

Mental Illness (or the lack thereof) has no connection to gay marriage, anal sex is performed by many heterosexual couples and what does that have to do with raising children?

Are you having your clean, missionary,heterosexual  sex infront of your children?

And the rest of your post is even more incoherent drivel!

1 hour ago, Logosone said:

Because the desirability of having roads in a modern society is very high for the majority of people.

 

What is the desirability of gay marriage for the majority of people?

 

What advantages does gay marriage bring for the country as a whole?

Not for me!

What do I care about "the majority of people"?

48 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

 

Perhaps a Thailand economy that's forced to shift to actually working and producing things -- instead of relying on easy mass tourism dollars that don't require a skilled or educated workforce and ends up ravaging the country's environment -- wouldn't be such a bad thing for the country in the long term. 

Sure...and of course, that will happen within a few months, and therefore mass- unemployment will be completely avoided!

"...found him to be highly responsible, caring for the students and wanting them to maintain discipline."

No, no and the all important "discipline" eg "shut up and do as you are told"!

17 hours ago, Logosone said:

Well, for a start because gays can not produce children and therefore can not produce future taxpayers.

 

If everyone was gay the whole idea of pensions, the generational contract where the future generations pay for the pension of the old, would be a non-starter. 

 

So from the outset being gay and living a gay lifestyle costs society money because gays can never produce future taxpayers.

 

It would be quite fair to tax gays on that justification alone.

 

However, gay marriage is another universe of subsidising gays with all kinds of benefits, that cost the taxpayer hundreds of millions of Dollars.

BUT NOT EVERYONE IS GAY!
Red Herring, all the way!

If my granny had wheels, she'd be a bus!

19 hours ago, Logosone said:

Of course if gay marriage would benefit the country as a whole then you would have to support gay marriage.

 

Looking at the UK, Spain or Germany I don't seen any great benefit to the country as a whole that gay marriage has brought.

 

Has there been any disadvantage to having gay marriage? Of course there are many disadvantages to non-gay taxpayers in allowing gay marriage. Gay marriage would entitle gay couples to typical marriage benefits including claiming a tax exemption for a spouse, receiving social security payments from a deceased spouse, and coverage by a spouse’s health insurance policy, largely at taxpayers’ expense. 

 

Indeed in the US the Congressional Budget Office estimated that the cost to the federal government of extending employment benefits to same-sex domestic partners of certain federal employees (making no mention of additional costs such as Social Security and inheritance taxes) would be $596 million in mandatory spending and $302 million in discretionary spending between 2010 and 2019.

 

So it costs the non-gay taxpayer hundreds of millions. Why should non-gays subsidise gays?

 

 

 

Wow!

Why should I pay taxes for roads, when I don't even have a drivers license?

Why should non drivers subsidise drivers?

If by "nation" he means "himself and his ilki and puppet masters"...he is 100% right!

On 7/12/2020 at 7:59 AM, TopDeadSenter said:

 Trump doesn't wear a mask - causes much tears and angst.

 Trump does wear a mask - causes much tears and angst.

 

Sometimes I wonder if the problem is not with Trump?

Oh, don't wonder!

It 100% is!

To have ANY tourists, you first need to open the borders!

And by the way: even 1,5 million -should they come- will not save millions of jobs in or related to the tourism industry!

4 hours ago, Destiny1990 said:

He said these dirty  farangs without a facemask then how many times he has been caught himself in public without his facemask ?

Yeah, but he is from Thailand, where the lack of testing has nothing to do with miraculously low numbers of deaths and infections and everything is 100% under control!

Not like the dirty unwashed farang, coming from their corona- infested countries...

you no undasatand Thailan...

5 hours ago, Tippaporn said:

Yeah, but it gives the left so much hope.  Every other avenue they've tried has failed so maybe, just maybe, this will be their 'golden goose' to nail Trump.  Please, Kelsall, don't take away the left's hopes and fairy dreams.  That's cruel.

Let's see'em then! 

Here is alittle story, to help the guys from yesteryear understand a bit better!

When I was a kid (70's) in Germany we had a very popular sweet!

It was a waver, with sweet eggwhitecream, covered in chocolate, forming a small cone!

Evey child loved it!

These delightful treats were called "Negerkuss" - which translates into "Negrokiss"

When I was a child, a "Neger" was a black man or woman and it never crossed my mind, that there was something wrong with it!

My father had a colleague, who was a "Neger"- a friendly man, everybody liked - especially the children!

Then...some years later...they changed the "Negerkuss" into a "Schokokuss" and no child really understood, why?

What was wrong with being a Neger and why do you have to change the name of the treat?

And when I was 13, I saw "The Color Purple" and later "Roots"...and I understood, why a thing, that had no hateful or hurtful meaning to ME, could be extremely hurtful to others and I understood, that a "Negerkuss", as innocent as it was to me and my friends, might not have been so innocent to others!

My opinion in the matter of changing the names of the "Redskins" into something else, does not matter a single bit!

But if people are hurt by that name, it should be changed!

It is not that hard to understand!

6 minutes ago, giddyup said:

It's still available, illegal or not, child porn is probably about the only one not freely available, but there's plenty catering to underage girls. The girls may actually be 18 or over, but the suggestion is they are much younger. So is role playing rape, bondage, torture etc etc. BTW, there are plenty of sites besides Pornhub.

There is a difference, between some one DRESSING like a schoolgirl or ACTING like a schoolgirl and BEING a schoolgirl!

There is a difference between a ROLEPLAY of incest or rape and REAL incest or rape!

Here is a hint: one is ILLEGAL, the other one is not!

I'll let you figure out, which one is which!

4 hours ago, lks7689 said:

Maybe it's time you realise that they prefer you somewhere else?

I bet you have talked to the several hundred thousand, who work in the tourism industry!?

I was out on Patpong on Wednesday- night!

Police- patrol started at 5:30!

NOT ONE of them, wearing masks!

And when the rain started, the little sugarpoof- monsters all huddled up under the roofs of the bars and restaurants- no social distancing needed!

Leading by example, I guess!