OZinPattaya

35 minutes ago, Crazy Alex said:

Just as i figured... the ad was taken down because it speaks the truth. Liberals literally HATE the truth.

The Ad was taken down because it came from a right-wing source, pure and simple. Had it come from a left-wing source I seriously doubt there would have been much of an issue here. It's not a question of truth, which can always be debated. The problem is not the suppression of the "truth" but rather the very conditions and means of even discussing it. As in, freedom of speech and discourse without undue fear of reprisal. That would be a start.

7 minutes ago, sirineou said:

Much has being revealed, but was not actionable because of Presidential privilege. . but not all  would have been made public if there were sealed indictments to protect against  statute of limitations . 

If he is not reelected pay particular attention to the southern district of  New York, and Florida. 

" The statute of limitations refers to the time period between when an offense is committed and the individual is charged (i.e., indicted.) However, there are actions that can cause this time period to toll (stop running), and there are states and/or crimes for which there is no “statute of limitation.” For the federal government, this time period is very generally five years, and that is one of the reasons why a “sealed indictment” might be issued, to stop this “clock” from running while keeping an investigation secret. " 

https://www.quora.com/When-sealed-indictments-are-issued-does-that-stop-the-clock-on-the-statute-of-limitations

What do you, or your ilk, really think you're accomplishing other than proving your own political bias. I was no great fan of Bill Clinton but I never supported Starr's witch-hunt against him. So, you got an impeached Democrat and now an impeached Republican. Congratulations. You just accomplished something completely predictable!

17 minutes ago, simple1 said:

You are using the same behavioural style of language as the extreme left - both sides of the divide are equally guilty of 'wanting to impose their views'.

Come on now, equally guilty? I'm trying to think of a single leftist person who got fired from their job, de-monetized or de-platformed on social media for expressing leftist beliefs or criticisms of the right wing. If you can think of one I'll counter with 50 of the opposite. "Cancel Culture" is distinctly a phenomenon of the Left. There have been several instances of this already with people who dared to criticize the BLM in the wake of the riots, an employee of the Federal Reserve to name but one. To pretend there is any semblance of equivalence here is silly

On 6/15/2020 at 1:53 AM, Baerboxer said:

 

Meanwhile the young black female Mayor decrees he must be sacked immediately. How dare he use his weapon to defend himself when a person, over the drink drive limit, violently resists arrest, grabs a taser of an officer runs turns, and aims what might be the taser or could've been another weapon.

 

So the deceased's family think that if someone beats up the police and runs there's no right to shoot them!

 

I watched the video. He was clearly slurring his words when woke up and had been out celebrating. Failed the breath test, which he took peacefully, then decided to fight and run. Why did he suddenly decide to resist arrest? What was he afraid of? If he'd been cuffed and gone quietly he'd be alive.

 

What their seems to be is a growing idea black people should now be above the law, especially if being enforced by white officers. This is being pandered too by patronizing politicians and so called celebrities. 

 

I trust the police union will be wanting to discuss the summary dismissal by a black Mayor of a white officer - as she may be racist.

Growing idea? It's grown, fully grown. And yes, that is precisely what the BLM wants, is not for equality under the law, but for racial impunity under the law due to a vague concept of hereditary sin, which sin now justifies everything under the sun, no matter how criminal or disgusting the behavior.

If black people have a problem in America maybe they should hold the Democrats to task for all the promises they failed to fulfill. Something like 92% of black people voted against Trump. Call me crazy but if I vote against a particular candidate en masse I'm not really expecting too much from said candidate on my behalf. But if I keep voting for the same party every nauseating election, magically expecting different results, is that not the definition of insanity? At the very least it's not the opposition party's candidate who's to blame for your predicament, it's the party you keep voting for expecting different results, despite decade's worth of empty promises 

19 hours ago, Nigel Garvie said:

Wow, on the rampage tonight!

BLM is a vast, now worldwide, movement condemning injustice against black people.............its about race

Marxism is a political philosophy,  adhered to by a tiny insignificant bunch of academics and their students...............it is about equality of distribution of power and wealth. 

The idea of Marxists controlling BLM is like the idea of a rabbit controlling a train. 

But please, give me some evidence.

 

Hope not Hate's main activity was condemning rabid press like the Daily Seig Heil, for featuring endless twisted stories inspiring stupid ignorant people to hate immigrants. 

It appears that you would prefer Hate not Hope.

 

There's always and inevitably the appeal to sentiment. If you don't agree with my political worldview then you must support hate over hope. This is the emotional blackmail that lurks behind every self-loathing liberal. Because, make no mistake, they have no argument. So they have to appeal to your emotional sentiment every time.

16 hours ago, Tug said:

Donalds mental illness won’t let him accept when he looses look the man has solicited foreign interference in the election he refuses to back legislative moves to protect our elections he accepted help from foreigners in 2016 the one and only reason he’s hasent been indicted on that is because he is a sitting potus and Billie Barr is his pet da we see it we haven’t forgotten come on November!!!

The mental illness is Donald's? Won't let him accept when he loses? Seriously? The fact is, the Dems have zero moral ground here. They went out to impeach this president by hook or crook--the ends justifying the means--in the process lost all credibility except for their hysterical choir, and now have the hypocritical audacity to speculate that Trump might stoop to the same level of anti-democratic turpitude that they themselves practically invented.

On 6/12/2020 at 2:54 AM, Brunolem said:

So it seems that Biden still has moments of lucidity when he comes out of his basement looking for some natural light.

 

One wonders how the Democrats, supported by the younger/socialist generations, couldn't find a candidate among the Boomers, and had to go get out of retirement a guy from the Silent Generation!

 

Since Biden will probably be institutionalized after losing what remains of his marbles, long before the end of his term, a lot of attention should be given to his running mate...

 

Having said that, if Trump is reelected in November, expect nothing short of a full blown civil war in the US...

 

A civil war entirely of the Left's making. Which I can tell you will be more than welcomed by the hitherto silent Right, which has been lurking in the shadows and itching for this for a long time. Watching the Antifa whelps revolting with impunity, while the radical Right is chomping at the bit.

On 6/11/2020 at 7:13 PM, PatOngo said:

Both sides of the fence look bad right now, the Chinese will be very happy! 

Very well spoken. They do. Very happy doesn't even begin to describe the positive jubilation of the Chinese right now.

Given the civil unrest in America, somehow I seriously doubt that Great Britain and Europe are going to fill the vacuum where China is concerned. You think China worries about England and Europe?

This is journalism for you nowadays. The moral judgement is implied in the headline itself. Far-right vs. Anti-racist. The implication being of course that being right-wing is inherently racist. Or that being left-wing is inherently non-racist. Is left-wing media so insecure about the journalism they are schlepping that they can't even muster a headline that isn't ludicrously biased? Okay, folks, before you even read the story, this is what you should believe. It's right there in the headline in case you just got a lobotomy.

3 minutes ago, TopDeadSenter said:

Much more. The writing is on the wall already. Next will be a major concerted move for "reparations". For this they will rewrite history to portray whites as brutes invading Africa and capturing slaves, slaves who then went on to build the white man's world. The new narrative will state slaves were never traded by blacks, and blacks never took white slaves. So financial reparations are due. It will be something like a 75% one off wealth tax, leaving white families trying to desperately live off the land in abject poverty and legally forced to kneel down to show subservience to blacks driving around in Lambos and Ferraris. Eventually those whites with common sense and drive again become wealthy and all the Lambos are wrapped around a lamp post somewhere and after wasting all their new money on crack and luxuries society will again revert to life as we know it. Rinse and repeat.

 

I'm wondering, do any TVF members think that society is more cohesive and content now that this BLM movement told us we are all racists and took over being our moral guardians and burnt down our cities? It doesn't seem to have been very cathartic from where I'm sitting. Anybody?

If the Left ever got to the point where they were able successfully to legislate such reparations--which I doubt--they would then truly witness the wrath of the Right, which they honestly have yet to see. And I hope they never do. There aren't enough Chazes in America to hide behind. This wouldn't be what I'd characterize as a fair fight, assuming Antifa is the toughest the Left has to offer. It'd be a massacre.

I personally foresee America dying the death of a thousand cuts until there comes a time when we acknowledge our irreconcilable differences, divide the country up, either peacefully or otherwise, and go about our own business.

16 minutes ago, Curt1591 said:

So much for virtue signaling !!!

 

Obligatory. Every one of these spineless mercenary corporations are doing the same thing. Protecting their profits. I'd honestly rather buy from the Chinese at this point. I'd really like to think that such shameless pandering will bite these companies in the @ss, but sadly I don't think it will. It has worked quite well for Nike.

7 minutes ago, Why Me said:

Fights the officers, grabs their taser, flees on foot and then stops to aim what's in his hand, maybe the taser, maybe not, at the officers. I would say that's grounds for being shot at.

The actual report is conveniently short of such dirty details as per usual. We're just supposed to assume not only that the shooting was unjustified but racially motivated as well.

I think the police chief resigned before the guy hit the ground.