James105

He was quite funny in his prime. I was in the forces and he was one of the few (possibly only) comedians that would regularly tour overseas bases to support the troops on operations, put on a show and I don't think he made any money from doing these. I met him once on a deployment and he seemed quite a decent bloke. He is just a guy that told jokes with the purpose of trying to make people laugh, and those jokes were of their time before people became so pathetically weak and sensitive to well, just about everything really.

What every species does to ensure it's existence endures. Procreate and evolve. Maybe we'll get lucky and it will keep us around as batteries to power its energy requirements until it perfects the usage of drawing power from the sun.

Bit weird living in a country that has cannabis shops that can legally sell mind altering drugs yet are not allowed to sell harmless (at least in comparison to weed and cigarettes) vapes. Luckily for him he wasn't able to purchase the illegal vape (which could land him in jail for 21 days if caught), and merely having a punch up and lobbing a brick through a window will probably result in far less of a punishment.

Ok I am curious. Who do you think is a funny left wing comedian? Frankie Boyle who made fun of Katie Price's disabled son? Jo Brand who thought it would be funny if someone threw acid in a politicians face? Which right wing comedy shows have you watched recently to form the opinion that "rightwing humour is dominated by the reactionary stuff nobody wants to listen to"?

I would suggest Have I got news for you is different as it offers politically biased views on a channel that pretends it is impartial so I would not object to someone complaining about something that a) they are forced to pay for and b) is breaking their impartiality charter with impunity. Sky News as an equivalent example is as left wing biased as they come (hence they are going bankrupt and confirming the saying 'go woke go broke') but they are a private channel (same as GB news) so they can do what they want. If you have an equivalence with Sky News or another private channel where you can show that 70,000 right wing folks signed a petition to get it cancelled then you would have a point. My feeling is that right wing folks have better things to do than watch TV shows they know that they are not going to like for the sole purpose of policing with the goal of preventing others from watching it.

I never said it was. I was responding to someone who said "It seems a the show’s audience didn’t find it funny." which I found strange because why would someone watch a show that they didn't find funny? No-one is forced Clockwork Orange style to have their eyelids pinned open to suffer through something they don't like (I assume people own TVs like the one I have that offer other channels) and apparently 70,000 signed a petition to try to get a show cancelled as someone said something as a joke they didn't find funny. This seems to be quite an odd behaviour of leftists that they feel the need to police shows that they don't even watch. Very odd.

You do? What are you thinking? Another Ukranian rent boy getting up to mischief?

I doubt any of the signers of that petition have ever seen the show so they are not "the audience". Do you watch things you don't like on a regular basis so that you can complain and sign petitions about it? Is that common behaviour amongst leftists to purposely watch things not aimed at them so they can get mad and complain about it? I can understand if it is the BBC that they are forced to pay for but a privately funded channel seems a bit odd.

I'm curious to see his mugshot as from the videos (although not great quality) I've seen of the driver of the car he looks to be in his early 30s which considering he is an alleged drug taker would be quite surprising as taking drugs normally ages a person, not de-ages them. There was a man arrested who looks to be 53 who was part of the lynch mob trying to grab the driver when the police were detaining the actual driver and I assumed the police were talking about him rather than the driver, but now it seems the person who was driving is apparently 53... Something strange is going on here. Not convinced we are not being gaslit about something about this character, but no idea what as in the videos he for sure looks to be a white guy. At the very least I'd like to know what drugs he is taking as whatever he is taking he looks way younger than 53.

This is the most strawiest of straw men I think I have seen so far. Nobody is "desperate" for this to be a muslim and you are the first I've seen that seems to link the 2. Why do you think you did that do you think? Is there some kind of pattern or history of muslims ploughing vehicles into pedestrians with the purpose of killing and maiming them? If there was such a pattern of this kind of violence its no surprise that you are linking a car driving into pedestrians with muslims, but I wouldn't necessarily call you a racist for doing so, just someone who is able to identify a pattern of behaviour amongst a certain culture.

Best case scenario is that AI is benign and does all the jobs that humans hate, then does all the jobs that humans like, and then humans have no way to live a productive life so society and birth rates collapse. Worst case scenario is that AI is malevolent and destroys us all.

Utter embarrassment to the UK. The incompetent fool is getting desperate now and turning to countries even more corrupt than Rwanda to help him out of the hole he has dug for himself.

What hard evidence do you have that 18,000 gods (that humans have believed in throughout history) do not exist?

Isn't that your problem as well though? You only believe in just one more god than me and just like myself you don't believe in the other 17,999 invented by humans despite having no evidence that those other 17,999 gods do not exist. I'm sure you would agree that it would be silly to believe that Thor or Zeus or Odin is real.. right?

Thousands of gods have been invented by humans, some estimates have put it at around 18,000. If you think believing in a god ensures where you go in the afterlife then what makes you think you have the right god? Aren't you concerned that you rock up in the afterlife and Odin (for example) kicks you into Hel and an eternity of suffering for not believing in him, since you think that "belief" ensures where you go? I think having a belief would stress me out that I had it wrong considering there is literally zero evidence to go on. Not sure how religious folks sleep at night with the worry really.