- Popular Post
Bvor
-
Posts
261 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by Bvor
-
-
1 hour ago, iian23 said:
As previously stated, he has been to Thailand twice in the last 12 months. When checking in, the airline told him as you have had 2 visa exempt in the last year so you need a visa
even if the 2 visa exempt by air is the "new rule" (refer sandyf post ?) isn't it per calender year which would mean your friend is ok for 2 visa exempt's in 2024?
anyways i'm done with visa exempts and will hopefully be granted 60 day tourist e-visa's 4 times a year with 30 day breaks in oz.
- 1
- 1
-
1 hour ago, TigerandDog said:
There is a limit of 6 times per year when arriving by air. "Those who arrive at the airport without a prior visa will continue to receive a 30-day stamp up to 6 times per calendar year."
is this an official Order of the Royal Thai Police if so can the link be posted?
-
3 hours ago, DrJack54 said:1 hour ago, Lee4Life said:
Actually I believe it is 6 visa exempt entries by air per year, my neighbor was denied entry based on that rule last year at swampy, but I am not sure it is enforced regularly.
attachment from MFA website.........validity, enforced regularly and I/O discretion cannot confirm.
- 1
-
18 minutes ago, Peabody said:
the IO did indeed make it an issue. That's one more than zero issues.
interesting re I/O view of onwardticket.com. hope all goes well with the Ed Visa.
cheers
-
11 minutes ago, Peabody said:
FWIW, regarding throwaway tickets. They now want to see the email from the airline/agent and, most importantly, a payment receipt.
what form of air ticket was shown to I/O and why did she not believe it was a valid ticket?
-
not too many entries according to normal guidelines - just another petulant female I/O.
appears this time the throwaway airline ticket and the sameday border hop raised her ire sufficiently to threaten and bully.
however, has been stamped in until 9 may which normally can be extended.
application of the blacklist threat most unlikely (contradiction of 9 may entry stamp) - not happen IMHO.
- 1
- 1
-
14 minutes ago, AndyAndyAndy said:
They aren't foreigners. They're Russians.
disgraceful behaviour that taints the image of decent foreigners.
thailand needs to draw a line in the sand re antisocial foreign lawbreakers and expel these types.......no ifs and buts.
- 1
-
1 hour ago, Pattaya57 said:
I applied on Wednesday and just received my approved non-imm O visa today (Saturday), so 72 hours to get approval (application said 10 business days).
thats great, thx for the update.
access to global evisa and the reinstated perth thai airways flights sure beats what WA had to put up with since covid closures.
-
5 hours ago, Pattaya57 said:
Cost was A$120 and not having to ever send passport this is much easier than my alternative of applying in Jomtien
thx for the info.
good to see cost was same as pre evisa.
please post final outcome as I am considering doing same .
i also keep away from jomtien immigration.
-
19 minutes ago, Pattaya57 said:
The list of fees I provided is included on the new e-visa info page so no the fees are not invalidated
which would make the australian evisa single entry tourist visa a lot less than the NZ $300 fee and the "all others" USD $82 fee.
lt is what it is i spose.
cheers!
-
2 hours ago, Pattaya57 said:
Sydney released the new e-visa system today and they included a list of all the visa fees. No change, still $60 for a tourist visa
given that sydney has replaced the previous $60 tourist visa with the new evisa system it would seem that the 19 January 2023 list of visa fees has been somewhat invalidated.
bearing in mind NZ and other countries evisa fee requirements can anyone confirm what sydney/canberra evisa fee requirements is.
-
1 hour ago, sidneybear said:
Worth noting is that visas are going all online very soon
according to sydney announcement that consulate will only accept applications from NSW residents.
according to canberra announcement its embassy will accept applications from other states and regions but not from NSW residents.
both announcements have a 19 March 2024 commencement that "coincidentally" is the same date as New Zealands proposed fee increases...........????
i'm from Perth so the canberra announcement is most welcome albeit overdue.
-
5 minutes ago, sidneybear said:19 minutes ago, Pattaya57 said:
Pretty clear announcement. "The Royal Thai Consulate-Genaral will only accept applications from residents of NSW"
IMHO is somehow referring to other non evisa applications cos the thai evisa system has its own website and user manual - as stated in the announcement (where applicants need to be registered).
-
18 minutes ago, Upnotover said:
Yes that is the correct website.
Just start an application, you will soon get to the page where you find out that documents they want - depending on what type of visa you
i have a registered evisa account and apparently australia has now been granted evisa eligibility.
however when making a trial online application (that acknowledged my eligibility) the system gave a dropdown message that tourist visa single/multiple entries are not available on request .......??????.
anyone have any reason for this?
i am in thailand now but for application purposes i gave notice my location was in australia.
cheers
-
1 hour ago, george said:
i see nothing on the MFA website re this new visa fee bizzo as per AN forum..........i wonder why!
-
1 hour ago, Korat Kiwi said:
Most will holiday for 30 days or less.
visa exempt "policy" changes to herd the western cattle thru the tourist visa gate looks on the cards.
-
41 minutes ago, zzzzz said:
NOT true everywhere
Correct. Countless forum OP's over the years have attested to IO trashing "official rules". The only certainty in TIT is uncertainty.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
12 minutes ago, flyingtlger said:Nobody likes Russians.
TIT gov't does hence 90 days visa exempt.
- 2
- 2
- 2
-
4 minutes ago, dluek said:
not a big deal to pay 800B fine at CW
I think 800B is the minimum fine at IO "discretion" but even 2000B no big deal in the circumstances.
-
1 hour ago, dluek said:
Because seems it would be easier to do it myself than get her involved.
Not being a protected species and no previous TM30"s I wonder if you will cop a fine at Chaeng Wattana.
-
45 minutes ago, London Lowf said:
I wasn't aware of the 180-day rule, if indeed there is such a thing.
Neither am i .
90 days in 98 days of 2024 on top of 210 days in 2023 - good result thus far.
Albeit I haven't heard of any TR60's limit per year.
Would be good to know if there is one and what it is but given the 90 day in 6 month stoush i'd rather not ask on AN.
Apologies for muddying the waters a little by mentioning the tax resident threshold of 180 days.
cheers.
-
15 minutes ago, London Lowf said:
Did I just catch the IO on a bad day?
i don't think so. you were stamped in,she was just a tad suspicious cos thats a lot of time on tourist visas + extensions ( doesn't 180 days = tax resident?). the return air ticket query may have been to gauge if a further extension will be sought. i am also a retired long term visitor but keeping below 180 days per year. whether you are breaking any rules or not is somewhat unclear to me as IO rules and regulations are often applied inconsistently. your next tourist entry might be interesting. good luck.
- 1
- 1
-
1 hour ago, Caldera said:
The official rule was indeed rescinded
please provide link/confirmation that the "official rule" has been rescinded.
-
3 hours ago, bigt3116 said:
That rule was rescinded in about 2009
Can you provide a link of sorts so i can copy and present to IO if necessary............. or will it not matter as IO uses discretionary authority re "rules" "regulations" etc (TIT).
New Visa Exemption Rules?
in Thai Visas, Residency, and Work Permits
Posted
Royal Thai Police Order (number/year).