Jump to content

TheDark

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    702
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by TheDark

  1. 1 minute ago, Brunolem said:

    One can imagine that he forgot to type %, as in 0.1% for covid 19 and 0.68% for cancer...or something like that...

    If someone claims that she has done the math, I do expect this person to be proficient enough to use the correct ways to display the results. 

     

    That's also why I asked to see the source data as well as how the math was done.

     

    Math is beautiful as it's either correct or incorrect. So, let us see the math now.

  2. 1 hour ago, mauGR1 said:

    I did a math, since January 2020 apparently there is about 0,0148 chance to die from coronavirus.

    For a comparison, apparently one has about 0,685 chances to die from cancer.

    Not sure the numbers are correct, so feel free to correct.

    Looking at these numbers, are the lock downs worth ?

    So, by your math, Since January 2020 there is 1.48% chance of dying from coronavirus and 68.5% chance of dying from cancer. 

     

    Those are rather big numbers.  Care to tell, what sources did you use and show us your math as well.

     

    • Thanks 1
  3. 3 minutes ago, Logosone said:

    No, it's exactly the other way round.

     

    Immunity is the rule. It would be the lack of immunity that is the exception. The burden of proof is on those who would have you believe, quite fantastically, that there is no immunity.

     

    We know already that 50% of the people who get it are immune.

    Afaik 0% of the people who get covid-19 are immune. Some people don't have strong or even noticeable symptoms, but they still get the infection and can spread it around. 

     

    Immune people don't get infected and don't spread the virus forward.

    • Like 2
  4. 11 minutes ago, UbonThani said:

    Makes little difference. All short term. Lots of farm burn offs still which are far worse than planes.

    Is it really? 

     

    Most of the biodegradable material rottens after a while and the process will release CO2 to the atmosphere after some time. It would be great, if farmers would use the extra material to burn it correctly and generate electricity while doing so. 

     

    Oil, natural gas, coal are semi permanently stored hydrocarbons, which, when burned, release extra CO2 to increase global warming effects. That's not good in the long term.

     

    Yes, PM10 and PM2.5 and other small particles are annoyance and can cause lung diseases. Correct filtering when burning these, could make a big difference for our wellbing. 

    • Like 2
  5. 15 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

    “NHS Blood and Transplant is preparing to collect COVID-19 convalescent plasma from people who have recovered from this illness,” a spokeswoman said. “We envisage that this will be initially used in trials as a possible treatment for COVID-19.”

     

    “If fully approved, the trials will investigate whether convalescent plasma transfusions could improve a COVID-19 patient’s speed of recovery and chances of survival,” the blood service said.

    I wonder how many plasma donations are required to treat or help to treat coronavirus patients?

     

    I if understand correctly, foreign plasma give the patients "Antibiotics style (for bacterias)" boost to fight the virus, but receivers immune system is not able to copy the immune response from the plasma. Plasma transfusion simply gives more time for the body to learn to cope with the virus. 

     

    Perhaps someone more wiser could teach us a bit how this works? @Sheryl ????

     

     

  6. 1 minute ago, Logosone said:

    Same exact mortality rate as the UK as of today.

     

    Based on Johns Hopkins figures.

    UK is far ahead of killing her citizens. This is mainly because UK delayed it's actions too long, before it started to apply and tell the citizens about physical distancing. 

     

    Like said before. Sweden is a large country with quite few people, while it also has couple of over 1 million people cities. 

     

    1845829994_ScreenShot2020-04-19at19_45_46.png.bec47e6d250b398337d19a3d1e6d03e2.png

     

    • Like 1
  7. 16 minutes ago, Logosone said:

    The reason why I mention Sweden is that they are the example of a country that has basically done very little. Insignificant testing and only late and half-hearted and very limited social distancing.

     

    So you can use that example to compare against a country like Austria which has done a whole lot of testing and the UK which has done less testing (per capita) but has been strong on social distancing.

    Sweden is not doing well.

     

    2121907580_ScreenShot2020-04-19at19_34_35.png.57931e463b4f814d07b2e0b27f11ac2e.png

     

    https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/total-covid-deaths-per-million?tab=chart&country=DNK+DEU+NOR+SWE+USA+OWID_WRL

    • Like 1
  8. 2 hours ago, mauGR1 said:

    Apparently society is already in big trouble for trusting the experts.

    Not the society. A fraction, a loud fraction of the societies are yelling loudly how they don't trust the experts.

     

    I guess, with the help of pandemic, that problem is eventually going away. 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...