Masterton

Yes I am considering that area also, will have a look. The key factor is finding a place that has rooms/chalets right on the beach to stay in, that is what they are looking for first and foremost.

Thanks, I will check those out. Are the places in Jomtien/Na Jomtien you mentioned hotel/resorts or private condos you can rent?

Thanks, wasn't aware they had beach front rooms. I had a look and they are way above budget. Also would prefer to be further away from the centre of Pattaya ideally.

Thanks, will have a look

Thanks, the one on Koh Libong looks nice but very far. I was hoping to not have to travel too far from Bkk though, preferably by car.

Thanks, do you know or recommend any hotels like this on Koh Chang? I went to Samet about 10 yrs back and I am not sure it is suitable for them due to bad roads etc.

Hello, looking for some recommendations or names of any beachfront hotels that are literally "on the beach". Some elderly family members are visiting Thailand and want to stay in one of those hotels that has 'huts' or 'cabins' right on the beach. I am fairly sure these types of place exist in Samui or Krabi etc, but for logistical reasons I would prefer them to stay nearer to Bangkok. and nearer to civilization in general. Does anyone know of any such places in the vicinity of Pattaya for example? Away from all the chaos of the centre obviously, but near enough to make the occasion trip to some malls or tourist attractions. Along that coast, considering Koh Chang also but that might be a bit far. Hua Hin also an option, but not sure that this type of place exists there. Grateful for any suggestions. Thanks.

The claim is only "astonishing" to you because of your chosen "news" sources not reporting on it in order to further their narrative. How about using some of that intellectual curiosity to educate and inform yourself? It is not my job to eduate you, if you want to engage in a discussion about ways in which the 2020 election was stolen, then I suggest you better inform yourself. In any event, dwell in ignorance or not, I will not be responding further.

I suggest you change the title and content of the original post to be exclisively about voter fraud instead of continuously trying to deflect to that topic every time someone posts about potential ways the election could've been / was stolen. Just a suggestion to save and/or not waste anyone's time further.

You have a point. Anyone who gets their news from the Democrat Propaganda fake news media will of course have no knowledge of these facts, nor will they possess the intellectual curiosity to research it.

Says the person who still doesn't understand the difference between evidence and proof. Both are meaningless if they are not allowed to be presented in a court case. As others have repeatedly pointed out to you, most of the cases with merit were refused on procedural and standing grounds. And once again, you do not seem to understand that the thread is about the 2020 election being stolen, and as I pointed out previously, there were other factors involved in addition to 'voter fraud' which you can't seem to be able to see past. The deliberate and co-ordinated suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story in itself was enough to sway the election. Stop blabbering on about voter fraud and proof, you are clearly trolling and are not worthy of any further response.

What a completely idiotic comment. There are no such things as 'fake electors'. Perhaps you should get your information from sources other than Democrat Party propaganda and do your research about elections and history. Opposing parties sending alternate slates of electors is not only legal, but in the case of the 1960 election resulted in the alternate (Democrat) slate being granted the votes. Do your own research and form your own viewpoints instead of blindly parroting fake news propaganda.

You clearly have no idea what you are talking about (as usual). It is common knowledge that Pensylvania violated the terms of their own constitustion when they illegally changed their voting laws leading up to the election. No 'proof' was required by Texas to offer in order to raise the case. Just because the courts refused to hear the case, does not mean Texas were wrong to pursue it. Many legal minds absolutely disagree that Texas did not have standing, it is just one of the many injustices related to the 2020 election farce.

Followed up by a short winded way to demonstrate that you don't understand the difference between evidence and proof. Thanks for proving my points by the way... 🙄

Anyone who gets their information and "news" from the Democrat mainstream media will never believe that there was any impropriety in the 2020 election and they will believe until their dying day that it was the most secure election in history. It is a completely pointless debate because nobody on either side will ever change their opinion on it. You basically have those on one side who know what happened, and those on the other side who have been lied to and gaslit by the media and think they know. When mail in balloting was found to favour Republican votes in the past, the Dems and their dishonest media sang a very different tune. When they used it to cheat in the 2020 election then all of a sudden it was perfect. There were several factors involved in stealing the election and it was not only down to mail in ballot fraud. For example Pensylvania changed their election laws in a way that violated their constitution. And the media and social platforms deliberately supressed the Hunter Biden laptop story (which turned out to be 100% true). That alone was enough to sway the results according to research done later. Too many on here blindly repeating nonsense they heard in the media rather than doing any credible research for themselves and informing themselves of facts. The cases filed were not all by Trump and they were not lost due to the claims being without evidence. They were declined due to standing etc. There was a ton of evidence, it was just not heard. There is a difference between evidence and proof. Trump got more votes than any sitting president in US history and he only "lost" by a few thousand votes in a few swing states (popular vote is meaningless), states that he was mostly leading the day after the election until the they started counting the mail in ballots behind closed doors which took weeks and which amazingly seemed to mostly be for Biden. Yeah not odd at all.... Way too much to go into, but if anyone thinks the 2020 election was not stolen, and if you really believe that Biden got more votes than Obama and Clinton, then you really are living in fantasy land...