Why would you add the 'don't knows' to the votes in favour of his suspension? Makes no sense at all except that it fits your opinion.
The comments section of the Telegraph as an indication of what people think? The comments section of the guardian would be equally valid.
Seems the former director general of the BBC disagrees with this decision.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2023/mar/11/bbc-has-undermined-its-credibility-with-lineker-move-says-greg-dyke
"Dyke told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “There is a long-established precedent in the BBC that is that if you’re an entertainment presenter or you’re a football presenter, then you are not bound by those same rules.
The real problem of today is that the BBC has undermined its own credibility by doing this because it looks like – the perception out there – that the BBC has bowed to government pressure.""
I like my monarchy. There have been quite a few scandals in the past, with present social media that could, probably would, have meant the end of the monarchy, but they seem to have adjusted.
No chance at all, you don't stop a cult with facts. Telling them it was all lies forces them to confront themselves and admit they've been cheated.
Won't happen.
Tucker disagrees with you, this is about Trump's achievements.
"That's the last four years. We're all pretending we've got a lot to show for it, because admitting what a disaster it's been is too tough to digest. But come on. There isn't really an upside to Trump."