stevenl

Ignorance is bliss.

Let me correct that for you. "No-one seems to have noticed the fact that if her bike was stolen by a Thai, it never would have made the English language news."

With many sources available, the other take is nonsense.

That's the difference between approved, aka reliable, sources and unapproved, aka unreliable, sources.

And don't forget the many posts from expats stating they'll return to the UK when needed for health reasons due to free care .

In quite a few places they're present. E g. Outside the small big c at rawai beach Some time ago I checked, but must admit I didn't check recently.

Doesn't matter, taking them is illegal. Has been so for many years, as is importation to most western countries.

Why do you presume they have not been supplied?

No.

All you have to do to understand is ready. Yes, the confusion and misunderstanding is intentionally caused by alt right sources

I've heard this woman described as intelligent, well educated, articulate, assertive, professional woman in a position of power. Not knowing her I was unable to either agree or disagree...

Lol, blaming labour for something they may not do in the next years. How about looking at why it didn't happen in recent history and who is to blame for that?

In his defense, he hardly ever posts any links at all except AJ on the war in the ME.

So you consider the collateral damage numbers as given by the IDF acceptable.

"why claim it was only civilians killed". A claim that was made only in your mind. You were brushing over the dead, no denying that.

"So your answer is to do nothing". No idea why you come to that conclusion. My answer is your solution is not practical and will never be implemented. Enforcement of helmet wearing, ending ghost riding and no tourists without a valid DL are more practical imo.

Cherry picking much? Putting your beliefs in the IDF? Let's say it was 150 dead, seems reasonable. Sure some of them would have been terrorists, let's be generous, 25? So only 125 civilians, that's ok then. And sure, you can argue about the numbers.

"One very effective and fairly easy thing they could do is wait outside of every school and when the motorbikes come out with driver/passengers not wearing helmets, give them a ticket." That would lead to an uprising. Not feasible. "When underage kids come out riding a bike, take the bike and call their parents. If the parents gave the bike to the child to use, then they should be in legal trouble. ". Same, not feasible. "other than stop ever foreigner at the Chalong roundabout" And many Thai without helmets or with modified bikes.

So first you state Russia can not realistically gain anything, then you state Ukraine will lose if they continue fighting. Looks like you're lost in your own thoughts, not yet fully accepting a dawning realty.

You do the video at home these days, with 'test' interruptions in between. Plus I don't think it's a constructive video that will help in any way.

"From 2021 to 2023, fatalities rose from 96 to 168 annually.". With people inside and no tourists, if course numbers were lower. The number of fatalities has for years and years been around 180 per year.

I didn't check the second link. But from the first one "Scottish Labour has taken a 10-point lead over the SNP in the latest YouGov poll on Westminster voting intention. The two parties are also neck-and-neck for Holyrood voting." I must say I don't see where 'also' in the second sentence comes from.

Nowhere, that's why I didn't ask you.

Excellent comparison. "It means making America great again. Other leaders say similar, for example Hitler wanted to make Germany great again"

Russia snubs invitation to an event they weren’t officially invited to,