SunnyinBangrak

Not really no. If a person who was not even president was storing top secret and classified documents on an unsecure home server where it was hacked by enemy states and who then went on to physically smash the hard drive with a hammer and bleech-bit to cover it up is NOT a crime, then it's a hard sell to say President Trump having documents locked up at MAL with heavy security is a major crime. It smacks of double standards and lacks logic. Complex legal situations are generally determined by precedent which does to your assertions what an iceberg did to an unsinkeable cruise ship.

sometimes a simple picture helps understanding a situation.

I saw no evidence of your unsupported claim. I saw an incredible patriot who was baselessly smeared and attacked by the losing party both before his election and during his term. He was falsely accused without evidence of all manner of dreadful crimes, even impeached twice on nonsensical charges which wasted years and destroyed the concept of impeachment(it was not meant to be a tool to demonstrate hatred of a politician that beat you). I ask, what person that is "just out for himself" would donate his entire salary to good causes. Does Biden donate his entire salary? "During his 2016 campaign, Donald Trump promised to donate his salary if elected President. It was a promise, even his critics acknowledge, that Trump was keeping." https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2021/02/27/president-donald-trump-probably-donated-his-entire-16m-salary-back-to-the-us-government--here-are-the-details/?sh=362faff31a8d Calling others "stupid" because they can see through the 6 years of lies and dishonesty used to attack DJT does not reflect well on your ability to form judgements, and certainly shows a lack of respect for those with differing opinions than you hold yourself.

My takeaway from this request for a special master is surprise that the court order implicated the current president so directly. This is contrary to repeated claims that Biden was not involved in this latest witch hunt against the man the democrats are terrified of running against. I think this latest attack on Trump would have more chance to succeed if it weren't so obviously political, which the court order shows is the case. Maybe they should have redacted this to protect the democrat narrative? Oh well, better luck next time! "On May 10, 2022, NARA informed Plaintiff that it would proceed with “provid[ing] the FBI access to the records in question, as requested by the incumbent President,beginningas early as Thursday,May 12,2022” https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/master-order/bd04012fd4a34767/full.pdf

Highly abusive and defamatory comment there against the most beautiful and classy first lady we ever had. Seeing such terrible false comments made against Melania makes me think this latest witch hunt against President Trump is falling apart at the seems causing such lashing out by the disappointed.

The timing should not be a surprise. Doing this at the start of september is genius, it leaves plans to keep Europeans warm this winter in tatters and causes maximum disruption and fear. It leaves no time to build new coal or fossil fuel generators or reopen mothballed nuclear plants. If only Europeans had been warned of the dangers of relying almost solely on Russian energy imports to keep the lights and heaters on. All these government agencies around the world and literally NOBODY knew it was a dangerous situation? If anybody did warn about this danger, please accept my apology, and name the one person that raised the alarm(and was mercilessly mocked for doing so).

What you say about Rittenhouse may be a popular narrative of the left. I well remember the threads where this narrative was set in stone. But it is factually incorrect. "In a post-verdict tweet, U.S. Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-New York, called the outcome "heartbreaking." "Justice cannot tolerate armed persons crossing state lines looking for trouble while people engage in First Amendment-protected protest," he wrote. Part of that statement -- the claim Rittenhouse was armed when he crossed state lines -- was repeated by many in the wake of the verdict. But that information is wrong " https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/nov/26/jerrold-nadler/nadler-wrong-claim-rittenhouse-crossed-state-line-/

I see brick weed for sale on facebook marketplace. All sellers seem to have 3 different kinds, gold, red and blue if memory serves. Do these signify different qualities? I can remember one time getting some exceptionally fine brick weed. It was nice dark green and a bit sticky. It was a fantastic smoke and I went back the next day to buy another block for spare but they had sole out and back to the usual dry, seed-ridden stuff that smelled a bit moldy and was their usual product. I would love to buy whatever it was I got that time. Feel free to post suppliers you had good experiences with for brick.