ozimoron

que? do you have a point to make?

Neither of these secret service agents has disputed her claim under oath.

That in no way establishes that he wouldn't have been angry and stupid enough to try.

all of it. https://abcnews.go.com/International/russias-blockade-odesa/story?id=85083666

stop- misquoting me.

Again, I said that an AR-15 round has a greater hitting power than a glock. At no stage did I state or imply that an AR-15 was a handgun. The kinetic energy of a bullet determines its hitting power, not just its size. The amount of energy a bullet radiates into a target is determined by a simple formula taught in high school: It’s the product of one half the projectile’s mass times the square of the velocity. https://www.thetrace.org/2017/06/physics-deadly-bullets-assault-rifles/

Putin placed a call...

The AR-15 assault rifle was engineered to create what one of its designers called “maximum wound effect.” Its tiny bullets – needle-nosed and weighing less than four grams – travel nearly three times the speed of sound. As the bullet strikes the body, the payload of kinetic energy rips open a cavity inside the flesh – essentially inert space – which collapses back on itself, destroying inelastic tissue, including nerves, blood vessels and vital organs. “It’s a perfect killing machine,” says Dr. Peter Rhee, a leading trauma surgeon and retired captain with 24 years of active-duty service in the Navy. https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/all-american-killer-how-the-ar-15-became-mass-shooters-weapon-of-choice-107819/

I never suggested the AR-15 was a handgun. It's easy to compare the muzzle velocities of an AR-15 and any gun using simple math.

It has strategic advantage in blockading shipping moving south from Odessa.

This is the reason Pelosi blocked Gym Jordan from the Jan 6 committee. In a column noting the continuing interference Republican Party members are running for Donald Trump as the Jan 6th Committee exposes more evidence of the former president's links to the Capitol insurrection, political scientist Jeffrey C. Isaac from Indiana University, Bloomington, singled out Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) as the man who could be the key to more information about that day's events. '"Jim' was one of the most violent and adamant promoters of Trump’s Big Lie," he accused. "After the violence of Jan. 6th subsided, Jim led the effort on the floor of the Senate to delay and obstruct the counting of the Electoral Votes, and was perhaps the most vocal and visible of the 147 Congressional Republicans who voted to overturn Biden’s victory. https://www.rawstory.com/jim-jordan-2657596719/

She did give an answer. She's entitled to answer as she see fit. She didn't lie, unlike the last 2 Trump nominees.

nobody has refuted Hutchinson's damning statements under oath. https://www.rawstory.com/donald-trump-jan-6-2657594078/

Exactly as Trump's picks met his requirements as set by the Federalist Society.

A lying scum bag like Kavanaugh on the bench. Apparently, Brett Kavanaugh made a promise to US Senator Susan Collins, the Maine Republican who says she’s pro-choice, that he would not vote to overturn Roe if appointed to the Supreme Court. This is getting a lot of attention, because Collins is getting a lot of attention. She said she believed he wouldn’t go there. https://www.rawstory.com/the-supreme-courts-illegitimacy-is-accelerating/

It wasn't humorous, most people are horrified.

Just like "I like beer" is a fine role model?

They don't already have role models? They need more at the expense of black women who have never had any? You really can't get the point can you?

Do you watch Fox News or Newsmax?

Meeting a nazi from a foreign country does make you far right. Why did you leave that point out? Do you consider it irrelevant that she went to a foreign country to meet with a known nazi leader?

"Folks" getting upset is why she ducked the question. It would have made no difference to the senate vote. At least she didn't lie to senators about her voting intentions.

Well the senate didn't agree with you.

U.S. Rep. Marsha Blackburn, the Republican nominee for Tennessee’s open U.S. Senate seat, has twice been on the list of speakers for a conference organized by an anti-Muslim activist group, and has met with leaders of a far-right Austrian political party with Nazi roots. Blackburn, who has previously faced criticism for her association with a former leader of a neo-Confederate hate group, was listed as one of 20 confirmed speakers — including Milo Yiannoupolous and Steve Bannon — at the November 2017 Restoration Weekend, a three-day gathering hosted by the David Horowitz Freedom Center. https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/politics/tn-elections/2018/10/04/marsha-blackburn-senate-hate-group-david-horowitz/1513144002/ was estimated by GovTrack to be the most ideologically conservative member of the Senate for the 2019 legislative year https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsha_Blackburn

How would the question upset anybody? Do you know what she thinks a woman is?

Every one of Trumps picks were put to him by the Federalist Society.