Liverpool Lou

If you had billions, would you fly on a private jet without a medical team or trained physician with such a condition? If that person wasn't aware of the seriousness of the condition, yes, of course, he may.

Who was that and was he requiring, but denied, the same hospital treatment?

Would you even know you had such a condition? Exactly.

Well said.

"...they don't care what you or me think". Of course, they don't, there's no reason for them to care one iota about what anonymous foreign Asean Now posters think and there's no reason for foreign AN posters to get so hot and bothered about the subject to the extent that they appear to think that they can demand what Thai authorities do about the matter.

You left out the word ‘card’. Indeed I did but I doubt that anyone thought that I was "inserting my ATM". I also misspelled Krungsri but you missed that.

My point is that the chap making the claim, knows nothing other than what is reported in the media. Smith claimed that Thaksin's heart condition is fabrication. That has not been confirmed as being factual by any media sources.

Maybe you can go and inform the banks that you spoke to that Krrungsri and BBL both accepted my cash today just by inserting my ATM. No screen mentioned Thai ID being required. Were you, perhaps, trying to deposit cash into a 3rd party's account?

I didn't need anything today except my ATM card and PIN (BBL).

I wonder if this is one of the times that they haven't quite got it dialed in yet and it asks for a Thai ID #, but it should really ask for Thai ID# or PIN, depending on context? Please post back next time you try it and let us know if there's any changes. Paid cash into the Bangkok Bank CDM near Sukhumvit Soi 8 today. As in every other cash deposit transaction since the ID regulations were brought into effect all that was required was my ATM card and PIN.

Not unknown for mail from the UK also to be similarly franked.

Doesn't this violate medical privacy "laws"? Not if he authorised the release of that information.

Any hard facts to support what you know? No, I thought not. The hard fact is the usual "We all know" hard fact b0llocks.

...and there is absolutely no proof that he is not there also. You do realise that if he was transferred back to Klong Prem you'd also have "absolutely no proof that he was there" either!?

The fact of the matter is that none of "we all" know that at all.

It doesn't "matter" but it is of interest to some of the expat community to whom these articles are aimed.

Read it. Nothing further explained. Obviously, you didn't read the full, linked Thaiger article...that or you can't read.

As BS also asked, which account currently gives that rate?

Which "arguments" have I been involved with on this thread...the ones in which I was doing nothing more than pointing out facts, perhaps?

100% as long as the will is properly drawn up with signature and witnesses. Wills do not have to be registered anywhere.

U Thai? Gawd...obviously, he isn't.

Seems that this neighbour is neither inconsiderate nor ignorant.

Is that your situation Lou? Death is everyone's situation.

You don't think that Immigration is supposed to be advised of registered guests?

They do advise Immigration of their registered guests, though, don't they?