ASEAN NOW News

The UK government is contemplating legislation to remove Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor from the royal line of succession. Defence Minister Luke Pollard told the BBC this action would prevent Andrew from ever becoming King and is deemed necessary, regardless of the police investigation's outcome. Get the latest headlines in your email Despite being stripped of his titles last October due to his connections with Jeffrey Epstein, Andrew remains eighth in line to the throne. On Thursday, Andrew was released under investigation, 11 hours after being arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office, which he denies. Pollard confirmed that the government is working with Buckingham Palace to ensure Andrew is not "a heartbeat away from the throne." He hopes the proposal will receive cross-party support, but it will proceed only after the police investigation concludes. On Friday, unmarked police vehicles were observed at Royal Lodge, Andrew’s residence. Thames Valley Police, responsible for the arrest, is expected to continue searches at the property until Monday. The proposal follows support from MPs, including those from the Liberal Democrats and SNP. Some Labour MPs, critical of the monarchy, are skeptical about the necessity of the move due to the low likelihood of Andrew ascending to the throne. Introducing such legislation would require an act of Parliament, needing approval from MPs and peers, and royal assent from the King. It would also need backing from the 14 Commonwealth countries where King Charles III is head of state, such as Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. The last significant change to the line of succession was in 2013 with the Succession to the Crown Act, and the last removal due to abdication was in 1936 with Edward VIII. Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey emphasized that police should conduct their investigation without interference. He noted that Parliament would need to address the issue, ensuring Andrew can never become King. The SNP, led by Westminster leader Stephen Flynn, expressed support for Andrew's removal from succession if legislation is necessary. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 20 Feb 2026 View full article

US President Donald Trump has announced a new 10% global tariff after the Supreme Court rejected his previous import taxes. The court's decision, which Trump criticized as "terrible," struck down most of the global tariffs announced by the White House last year. Get the latest headlines in your email The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that Trump overstepped his powers, a significant win for businesses and US states challenging the duties. This ruling could lead to billions in tariff refunds and has created further uncertainty in global trade. In a speech from the White House, Trump stated that refunds would likely face prolonged legal battles. He expressed intentions to use other laws to continue his tariff strategy, claiming these tariffs promote US investment and manufacturing. "We have alternatives - great alternatives, and we'll be a lot stronger for it," Trump asserted. The legal battle centered on import taxes implemented last year on goods from nearly every country. Initially targeting Mexico, Canada, and China, the tariffs expanded to include many more countries, declared during a "Liberation Day" event last April. The White House had relied on the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which gives the president authority to "regulate" trade during emergencies. However, the measures faced backlash from firms affected by the sudden tax increases, fearing higher prices. Challenging states and businesses argued that the IEEPA does not mention "tariffs" and was not intended to allow the president unchecked power over taxes and trade deals. Chief Justice John Roberts sided with this interpretation. Roberts stated, "When Congress has delegated its tariff powers, it has done so in explicit terms and subject to strict limits." He emphasized that if Congress intended to provide such extraordinary tariff powers, it would have indicated so clearly. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 20 Feb 2026 View full article

The Balearic Islands' parliament is preparing to debate a proposed ban on non-residents purchasing homes in Majorca, Minorca, Ibiza, and Formentera. This proposal, put forward by the political party Més per Mallorca, will be reviewed on February 24. Get the latest headlines in your email MP Lluís Apesteguia stated that the proposed ban would prioritize homes for residents, discouraging speculative investment in the region's property market. He affirmed that this restriction complies with EU rules and existing case law. Apesteguia emphasized the importance of making housing accessible to locals rather than being dominated by investment funds. He questioned whether homes should cater primarily to investors or local residents, as reported by the Majorca Daily Bulletin. The rising interest from foreign buyers in the Balearic Islands and other popular Spanish holiday destinations has led to increased property prices, prompting local protests. Sebastià Sagreras, representing the People's Party of the Balearic Islands, announced that the party would oppose the ban. Marc Pons, former president of Menorca's council, acknowledged EU regulations might hinder the proposal, suggesting the need for alternative solutions to the housing issue. Vox spokesperson Manuela Cañadas criticized the proposal as "demagogic," according to the Majorca Daily Bulletin. According to real estate publication Idealista, the Balearic Islands are Spain's most expensive province for property. The report highlighted 25 municipalities experiencing record resale prices, with Ibiza’s Sant Joan de Labritja at the top. The average price per square meter there is £7,830 (€8,959). Majorca also saw significant price increases, with Colonia de Sant Pere experiencing a 37.5% rise. Idealista noted the islands' enduring attractiveness to international buyers, offering luxury, a Mediterranean lifestyle, and solid investment potential. Apesteguia stressed that the current market makes housing unattainable for most local citizens. He stated that the bill aims to ensure homes are primarily for residents, not just investors. Tourism and investment are crucial to the Balearic economy, but local needs are a growing concern among policymakers. The ongoing debate highlights the challenge of balancing economic development with ensuring affordable housing for residents. As this proposal reaches parliament, it continues to spark discussions about the future of housing in the Balearic Islands and how best to address both the desires of international investors and the needs of local populations. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 20 Feb 2026 View full article

Donald Trump has directed the Pentagon and other US agencies to release government files related to UFOs and extraterrestrial life. He made the announcement on his Truth Social platform, citing public interest in the subject. Get the latest headlines in your email The announcement came after Trump accused former President Barack Obama of disclosing "classified information." Obama had suggested during a podcast interview that aliens might exist. Trump told reporters on Air Force One, "I don't know if they're real or not," and noted he might help Obama by declassifying the information. In his social media post, Trump instructed government agencies to release files related to "alien and extraterrestrial life, unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), and unidentified flying objects (UFOs)." He described these topics as highly complex and important. Obama later clarified his stance, stating he had not seen evidence that aliens have contacted Earth. However, he emphasized that "statistically, the universe is so vast that the odds are good there's life out there." Trump mentioned he does not have a personal opinion on the existence of extraterrestrial visitors. He acknowledged that while he seldom discusses the topic, it fascinates many people. Speculation grew when Lara Trump, Trump's daughter-in-law, suggested he was ready to speak on the issue. She mentioned on a podcast that the president had a speech prepared about aliens which he would deliver at an appropriate time. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, when asked about this, responded with laughter, stating, "A speech on aliens would be news to me." Interest in unidentified flying objects and possible government secrets about extraterrestrial life has increased recently. This public curiosity was reignited after leaked Navy videos showed unknown objects, prompting discussions about their origins and implications. The topic of UFOs remains a subject of widespread intrigue. Many people believe the government possesses undisclosed information about extraterrestrial encounters. The release of these files could potentially shed light on long-held mysteries regarding UFOs and alien life. Trump's decision to release these files underscores a growing demand for transparency regarding unidentified phenomena. As the files become public, they are expected to stimulate further debate and investigation into the existence of extraterrestrial beings. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 20 Feb 2026 View full article

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's arrest, while seemingly catastrophic for the Royal Family, may ultimately strengthen their position. Since Andrew's controversial 2019 interview with Emily Maitlis, Prince William has reportedly been displeased with his uncle's actions, seeing them as a blemish on the family. Get the latest headlines in your email William's desire to distance Andrew from the Royal Family has been evident, particularly during a tense interaction at the Duchess of Kent's funeral. King Charles expressed his concern over Andrew’s arrest for suspected misconduct, emphasizing the need for a thorough investigation. While anti-monarchy group Republic views this incident as a potential turning point, allies of King Charles, such as broadcaster Jonathan Dimbleby, argue it could fortify the monarchy. Charles's decisive actions last October, stripping Andrew of titles and military honors, demonstrate a clear intent to separate the Royal Family from Andrew's personal issues. The Epstein scandal has long cast a shadow over the Royals. However, focusing the current investigation solely on Andrew could draw a critical line between him and the rest of the family, helping them to regain public confidence. King Charles's consistent reference to his brother as "Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor" signals a deliberate distancing from the controversies associated with him. This strategy may allow the Royal Family to cleanly separate their identity from Andrew's, potentially emerging from the scandal with renewed strength. In conclusion, while Andrew's legal troubles present immediate challenges, they also offer an opportunity for the Royal Family to reinforce their integrity and resilience. The outcome of the investigation could serve as a pivotal moment, helping them navigate past this adversity with unity and clarity. Key Takeaways Andrew’s arrest poses challenges but may strengthen the Royals. King Charles's swift actions serve to distance the family from controversy. Drawing a line between Andrew and the Royals could enhance their public image. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 19 Feb 2026 View full article

As tensions between the US and Iran escalate, the deployment of significant US military assets, including the USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group, signals more than diplomatic maneuvering. The movement of another carrier, the USS Gerald R Ford, towards the Middle East, along with other military reinforcements, suggests that Washington is preparing a range of military options. Get the latest headlines in your email These deployments could serve as diplomatic leverage but also indicate that indirect negotiations between Tehran and Washington might be at an impasse, potentially leading to military action if neither side shifts its stance. The critical question arises: why does Iran, facing the world’s most powerful military and its strongest regional ally, remain defiant? The answer lies in the US's stringent conditions for negotiations, which Tehran views as tantamount to surrender. From Tehran's perspective, the US demands—including ceasing uranium enrichment, limiting missile range, and halting support for regional groups—are not just negotiation points but core components of Iran’s security framework. These elements are fundamental to what Iran terms its "Axis of Resistance," a network aimed at deterring threats and exerting regional influence. Iran’s ballistic missile program compensates for its outdated air force and limited access to advanced military technology. The nuclear program, although officially peaceful, is considered crucial for its deterrent value. Mastery of uranium enrichment grants Iran a "threshold capability" that offers strategic leverage, as it signifies potential capacity for weaponization pending a political decision. Iran’s leadership, notably Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, views accepting US conditions as potentially more dangerous than enduring a limited conflict. While a military confrontation, however damaging, may be survivable, yielding its strategic deterrence would fundamentally weaken Iran's defense posture and regional stature. Yet, the risks of military engagement are multifaceted. A US campaign would likely target Iran's leadership and security apparatus, impacting the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and potentially destabilizing domestic control. The resulting power vacuum from key leadership losses could destabilize the country further, especially amid lingering public discontent following violent crackdowns on protests. For Washington, while the military might exists to meet objectives, war is inherently unpredictable. Miscalculations could escalate conflict beyond initial plans, destabilizing the region and creating unforeseen challenges. Previous conflicts have demonstrated how quickly wars can spiral, complicating goals and management. Internally, Iran faces significant economic pressures from ongoing sanctions, inflation, and economic stagnation. Escalating tensions further strain the economy, risking public backlash if livelihoods are threatened. Tehran’s defiance serves to project strength locally while signaling resilience to international pressures, although this stance potentially limits diplomatic flexibility. Ayatollah Khamenei confronts stark choices between the "worst" option, strategic surrender, and what may appear as the "best of the worst," engaging in limited military confrontation. Publicly, Iran seems to lean towards the latter, despite the profound dangers involved. Both nations face substantial uncertainties with risks of miscalculation. A conflict could redefine regional stability and power dynamics, affecting global interests. As the situation develops, the stakes remain high for Tehran and Washington, encapsulating a complex interplay of geopolitical aspirations and the harsh realities of potential warfare. Key Takeaways Rising US-Iran tensions with military assets deployed in the Gulf. Iran resists US demands, seeing them as threats to its core security. The potential for conflict introduces significant regional and global risks. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 19 Feb 2026 View full article

Members of Donald Trump's Board of Peace have announced over $7 billion in aid for Gaza as part of a relief package aimed at reconstruction and stability. The announcement came during the board's inaugural meeting in Washington, amidst concerns from Western allies that the board could overshadow the United Nations. Get the latest headlines in your email This relief effort is part of the second stage of a US-brokered ceasefire, focusing on Hamas's disarmament and rebuilding Gaza. However, current indications suggest Hamas is not moving towards disarming, with its influence in Gaza reportedly extending. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has stated that Gaza’s reconstruction is contingent on demilitarization. The conflict began with a Hamas-led attack on Israel in October 2023, which led to a strong military response. The ensuing conflict has left Gaza’s infrastructure severely damaged, with an estimated $70 billion worth of destruction. Countries such as the UK, Canada, France, and Germany have opted not to join the Board of Peace, wary of its potential to bypass the UN. Addressing these concerns, Trump assured that the US intends to work closely with the UN, emphasizing the importance of stability investments. Key contributors to the relief package include Kazakhstan, UAE, and Saudi Arabia. The UN is set to provide $2 billion for humanitarian aid, while FIFA will contribute $75 million towards soccer-related projects in the region. Efforts are underway to establish a new transitional Palestinian police force, with 2,000 applications already received. This force, backed by the International Stabilisation Force, aims to maintain security and disarm non-state groups such as Hamas. Despite the plans, skepticism remains regarding Hamas's disarmament. Success in this area is crucial, as reconstruction and governance require a stable security environment supported by the local population. Hamas has indicated that disarmament would require Israeli withdrawal from Gaza. Trump’s approach, combining investment and development strategies, is seen as unconventional. His administration touts it as "new thinking" in conflict resolution. Meanwhile, questions persist about sustaining Gaza’s development amidst ongoing political divisions. Key Takeaways Trump’s Board announces $7bn aid for Gaza reconstruction. Disarmament of Hamas is essential yet challenging. International cooperation is crucial for Gaza’s future stability. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 19 Feb 2026 View full article

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has been released under investigation after his arrest for suspected misconduct in public office. Thames Valley Police arrested him in Norfolk and conducted searches at properties in both Berkshire and Norfolk. Get the latest headlines in your email King Charles III emphasized the importance of letting "the law take its course" and expressed full support and cooperation with the police. The investigation scrutinizes Andrew's ties to the late Jeffrey Epstein, alongside accusations of sharing confidential information. This arrest is Andrew's first, and he has consistently denied any wrongdoing. Thames Valley Police confirmed a detailed investigation is now in progress. Earlier this month, separate allegations surfaced regarding a woman allegedly brought to the UK by Epstein for a meeting with Andrew in 2010. This matter is still being evaluated. After his arrest at Sandringham, Andrew was seen leaving the police station looking subdued. Thames Valley Police alerted the Home Office in advance of the arrest. While this arrest is unrelated to sexual offence allegations, it highlights serious concerns about misconduct in public office. The situation remains under careful watch as the investigation unfolds. Thames Valley Police have concluded their searches in Norfolk but continue to assess all aspects related to the allegations, ensuring a thorough approach to the case. They remain committed to uncovering the truth and upholding justice. Key Takeaways Andrew investigated for public office misconduct. King Charles fully supports the police investigation. Arrest not linked to any sexual offence allegations. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 19 Feb 2026 View full article

President Donald Trump has issued a stark warning, stating the world has "probably 10 days" to see if a deal with Iran can be reached before potential military action. At the inaugural Board of Peace meeting in Washington, Trump emphasized the urgency, warning of consequences if a meaningful agreement isn't secured. Get the latest headlines in your email Negotiations between US and Iranian officials have recently shown progress in Switzerland. Special Envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law, reportedly had productive discussions. However, Trump acknowledged the difficulties in dealing with Iran's nuclear program, reiterating his hope for a diplomatic resolution. The White House's increased military presence in the Middle East includes the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier. Despite this buildup, the UK has not permitted the US to use its bases for potential strikes on Iran. Iran has bolstered its military defenses, with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamanei issuing warnings to US forces via social media. US intelligence has observed Iran reinforcing its military sites, heightening tensions. Congressional opposition to potential military action is growing. Democrat Ro Khanna and Republican Thomas Massie plan to invoke the 1973 War Powers Act to force a vote, aiming to curtail presidential powers in committing to armed conflict. Past attempts to limit such powers have faced resistance, as seen with Senate Republicans blocking a similar resolution regarding Venezuela. Khanna cautioned against catastrophe, pointing out Iran's complex society and military capabilities. The idea is to prevent unnecessary risks to US troops in the region. The Board of Peace, originally aimed at resolving the Israel-Hamas conflict, now appears to extend beyond, possibly sidelining the UN. As the deadline approaches, global attention focuses on whether diplomacy will prevail or if the region could face further instability. Key Takeaways Trump sets 10-day deadline for deal with Iran. Military tensions rise, UK withholding base support. Congress seeks to limit executive military action. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 19 Feb 2026 View full article

SummaryAndrew Mountbatten Windsor has been arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office - read the police statement in full Photos show cars arriving at the Sandringham Estate in Norfolk earlier this morning It comes after Thames Valley Police said they were assessing a complaint over the alleged sharing of confidential material by the former prince with late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein Andrew, who turns 66 today, has consistently and strenuously denied any wrongdoing This is a breaking story, we'll bring you more shortly Police statementspokesperson for Thames Valley poilice said: "As part of the investigation, we have today (19/2) arrested a man in his sixties from Norfolk on suspicion of misconduct in public office and are carrying out searches at addresses in Berkshire and Norfolk. The man remains in police custody at this time. We will not be naming the arrested man, as per national guidance. Please also remember that this case is now active so care should be taken with any publication to avoid being in contempt of court. Assistant Chief Constable Oliver Wright said: “Following a thorough assessment, we have now opened an investigation into this allegation of misconduct in public office. “It is important that we protect the integrity and objectivity of our investigation as we work with our partners to investigate this alleged offence. “We understand the significant public interest in this case, and we will provide updates at the appropriate time.” Get the latest headlines in your email Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 19 Feb 2026 View full article

In the aftermath of the Gaza War, Hamas is struggling to regain control over the region despite significant losses. The conflict left their military in disarray, leadership depleted, and infrastructure devastated. Despite these setbacks, Hamas is reclaiming control over security, taxation, and government functions, questioning its willingness to disarm as required by a new peace plan. Get the latest headlines in your email Activist Mohammed Diab notes that Hamas has regained control in over 90% of its areas, reinstating police presence and reestablishing administrative control. People in Gaza now rely on Hamas for essential services, highlighting its regained dominance. However, market vendors report aggressive tax enforcement by Hamas, making survival difficult under economic pressures. Traders, essential for importing goods post-ceasefire, face heavy taxation. Some report harsh measures, including threats and kidnappings, for non-compliance with tax demands. Hamas spokesman Hazem Qassem describes the region as in a state of emergency, justifying "exceptional measures" to maintain order. He separates these actions from Hamas's broader goals, attributing them to government necessity rather than organizational policy. Despite such control, Gaza's leadership is challenged by Israel. The Israeli Defense Forces report ongoing skirmishes, emphasizing the need for Hamas's disarmament to ensure peace. Conversely, Hamas highlights continued Israeli attacks, complicating the ceasefire's stability. Trump's peace plan, integral to Gaza's restructuring, depends on Hamas disarming. Negotiators face complications in how this disarmament would be executed, given the group's deeply ingrained and well-armed presence. Internally, Hamas faces political tensions. Reports of internal power struggles and continued influence in government sectors suggest resistance to relinquishing control. Public actions, such as medical case transfers through Rafah Crossing, indicate Hamas's ongoing administrative involvement. The situation in Gaza remains critical, with the implementation of Trump’s plan hinging on tangible disarmament actions. The international community watches closely as this complex power dynamic continues to evolve. Key Takeaways Hamas regains control amidst post-war chaos. Tax enforcement challenges local traders. Disarmament crucial for peace plan success. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 18 Feb 2026 View full article

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg found himself on the stand in a landmark trial scrutinizing social media's impact on young users. Challenged over Meta's efforts to block underage access to platforms, Zuckerberg admitted improvements but lamented delays, stating, “I always wish we could have gotten there sooner.” Get the latest headlines in your email The plaintiffs' lawyers questioned the effectiveness of Meta's age verification, arguing children often bypass restrictions. Zuckerberg responded, “I don’t see why this is so complicated,” while acknowledging the company could do more to protect users. During the trial, plaintiffs accused Meta of designing addictive platforms harming young people's mental health. Evidence includes internal documents supporting these claims, while Zuckerberg's legal team attributed issues to external factors like home life. This trial is pivotal, with KGM's case among many "bellwether" trials gauging jury reactions to social media's design liabilities. Recent testimony by Instagram CEO Adam Mosseri denied claims of clinical addiction, describing excessive use as akin to watching too much TV—an interpretation disputed by many psychologists and lawmakers. At the heart of these proceedings is ongoing frustration for families like John DeMay's, who lost his son to an online scam. DeMay, skeptical of past assurances from Zuckerberg, continues advocacy for greater online child safety and finds hope in court action over legislative progress. Zuckerberg’s testimony follows a history of congressional hearings on child safety where his promises left families unconvinced. The trial may lead to significant repercussions for social media firms, potentially altering platform designs and leading to substantial payouts. Meta, also facing separate legal challenges in New Mexico over consumer protection violations, denies concealing knowledge of social media harms. Instagram has introduced safety features for young users, but a review by advocacy group Fairplay found most features lacking effectiveness. Concerns about Meta’s handling of child safety have been echoed by former employees, with allegations of data misuse and toxic workplace practices, highlighting internal struggles with these critical issues. Key Takeaways Zuckerberg defends Meta’s child safety measures. Trial emphasizes social media's potential harm to youth. Ongoing legal battles could reshape platform policies. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 18 Feb 2026 View full article

Tensions are reaching a boiling point as Russia and Iran plan joint military exercises, with concerns over possible US military involvement. The drills, happening on February 19 in the Sea of Oman and northern Indian Ocean, aim to enhance maritime security and counter-terrorism efforts, according to Iranian navy commander Hassan Maghsoodloo. Get the latest headlines in your email These exercises, which began as part of the 2019 Maritime Security Belt involving China, showcase a united stance against Western geopolitical pressures. Meanwhile, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is conducting maneuvers in the strategically important Strait of Hormuz, amid threats of US intervention. President Donald Trump has previously warned of potential strikes against Iran, largely in response to the regime’s severe crackdown on protestors. As the bond between Russia and Iran appears stronger than ever, sources suggest the US might be on the verge of a major Middle Eastern conflict, possibly involving Israel. This would represent the most significant US intervention in at least a decade. The US aims to keep its military actions contained within Iran, if intervention occurs, but the question remains whether Tehran’s allies, such as Russia, would retaliate, potentially sparking a wider conflict. Diplomatic efforts between Washington and Tehran continue. Recent negotiations in Geneva, involving Trump’s advisers and Iran’s Foreign Minister, showed some progress but failed to resolve fundamental disagreements. Both sides admitted to making headway, but certain issues remain unresolved. Vice President JD Vance acknowledged these diplomatic challenges, highlighting Trump’s desire for a deal while noting Iran's reluctance to meet US demands. He remarked that diplomacy may have reached its "natural end," adding to the uncertainty of the situation. As the world watches these developments closely, the potential for conflict remains high, raising fears of a new war in the Middle East. Key Takeaways Russia and Iran prepare for joint naval exercises. US military intervention seems increasingly likely. Diplomacy struggles with unresolved issues between the US and Iran. Join the discussion? Already a member? Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 18 Feb 2026 View full article