Jump to content

jonny on the spot

Member
  • Posts

    85
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jonny on the spot

  1. 53 minutes ago, James105 said:

    The problem is that many presume (as I do) that the onus of "proving" those savings have been taxed will be on the individual.   I just use a single personal UK bank account for example, and have funds in there that have and have not been taxed.   I have no idea how I could "prove" that one specific £ has been taxed versus one that has not been.   

     

    My experience of dealing with Thai bureaucracy so far has been quite confounding and that is for simple tasks like buying a motor vehicle, extending my visa, changing address etc, so adding something as complex as tax into this mixture is quite a chilling prospect.

    Well said.

  2. You know another thing that i never understand, for years.

    They have a HUGE untapped source of revenue here in the idiots that drive. Make the police actually do what police are paid for.

    When they see someone driving like a <deleted>, stop them fine them.

    No helmet good fine.

    They already pay the police a salary if you can call it that, make them earn it.

    • Like 1
  3. 43 minutes ago, Dogmatix said:

    Something raised by a friend was the possibility of taxing international health insurance payouts in Thailand. If you claim for an operation in Thailand on your overseas insurance policy, will the remittance either to you directly or the hospital trigger off a tax demand due to income receive from overseas? Companies like AXA now use a Thai payment agent to make the payments to hospitals which would it even easier for the RD to track this “windfall” type of overseas income. 

    And who is absorbing the shortfall if that happened? The hospital, the insurance company, no me.  Not even these people could be that stupid. Oh hang on they could call it an initiative to stimulate the Thai health insurance market.

    Give all Thais a voucher for the first months cover ????

    • Haha 1
  4. 49 minutes ago, Dogmatix said:

    The RD spokesman was not being very truthful when he claimed there was international pressure on Thailand to do this. No other countries tax overseas income earned years ago on a remittance basis AFAIK and taxing on a remittance basis is virtually unheard of. The pressure from OECD, particularly the US and UK has been to set minimum corporate tax rates to make it harder for companies to avoid tax by shifting their domiciles to low tax jurisdictions like Ireland and Luxemburg but it is not the same for individuals because they have to actually live in a place to become a tax resident and the US which exerts most of the pressure re corporate tax doesn’t care what Thailand does te personal  tax anyway because it taxes its citizens on a global basis. You won’t see countries like Singapore, HK and the gulf states suddenly taxing offshore personal income under international pressure. Yes, there is international to collaborate with Common Reporting Standards (CRS) and FATCA etc and provide information on financial accounts of foreigners in Thailand, which in the case of FATCA ThAiland only complied with under threat of being cut off from the US correspondence banking system and thus international USD transactions. But it is huge distortion to blame international pressure for what they have just done.

     

    It seems to be the usual Thai government approach to assume that all Thai people are morons incapable of accessing any information in English from overseas and to blame foreigners for all nasty things they do themselves (remember the unwashed foreigners spreading COVID).

    Well said that man !

    • Thumbs Up 1
  5. 53 minutes ago, Middle Aged Grouch said:

    Very true.

     

    As mentioned before, many house owners from Europe, the UK, the US who have not declared their real estate in Thailand are going to be in some serious hot soup......mainly in France and the USA amongst others,  that have merciless and ruthless tax laws for their commoners....

    Sorry to be stupid, do you mean i should declare my houses in Thailand to the Thais, or the UK?

  6. 3 minutes ago, Dogmatix said:

    I think anything you remit to TH before 1 Jan 2024 is home and clear but after that maybe not. 

     

    What happens is that fill in your PNG 90 tax return which hopefully will be revised adding spaces to deduct DTA tax credits on overseas income by Jan-Mar 2025 which will be the first time you have to report this stuff (i.e. for the l2024 tax year) and you will pay tax based on that calculation, if any is owing.  Then they will send you a letter with a list of supporting documents you have to submit to the RD which will for sure include evidence of the sale of property or whatever generated the income and evidence of tax credits, if you are claiming any, all probably with certified and notarised Thai translations.  They will attempt to match the tax credits with the income to be sure there is a match which may only be the case, if you remit the exact amount you paid tax on.  They will have many reasons to reject your tax credits to be sure.

    Bleak aint it

  7. 5 minutes ago, transam said:

    I wouldn't worry just yet, it is an idea, but when they start working on how to implement the idea, I reckon there will be a lot of head scratching....????

     

    Just imagine the blokes that don't live here, but have a retirement visa for LOS in their passport, now if I were one of those, I probably would worry....????

    True that. However wait and see as a plan has never worked out too well for me in Thailand.

    But i suppose we will wait and see ????

    • Like 1
  8. 6 minutes ago, Dogmatix said:

    That’s a great example. Assuming they had already become Thai tax residents in the tax year they remitted the funds, John and Mary need to file a PNG 90 tax return for that year. If we assume the 10m they remit is from the profit, then that, as income from the sale of overseas immovable property, that is fully taxable in Thailand and they have no tax credit to apply because they didn’t pay UK tax on the gain. They will get the standard Thai tax allowances but their high income for the year will likely push them into the top marginal tax rate of 35%. Most likely any of the original principle used to buy the house would be lumped in as taxable income too because there is no clear way to separate it out.

     

    UK gives full tax break for sale of primary residence but TH does not. Thai tax on sale of property by individuals is calculated on a purely transactional basis on the total sales price according to a slightly complex formula based on how many years held without reference to your other income or top marginal tax rate. This rarely works out at more than 5% of the sales price with room for cheating if the sales price is less than the govt appraisal price. But this only applies to Thai property transacted at the Land Dept.

     

    Conclusion. John and Mary decide not to buy the 30 year lease which structurally is a poor investment anyway. They continue renting in Thailand and transfer their capital gains in smaller annual portions incurring lower marginal tax rates.  The numbers would probably look better if they took separate remittances and each filed their own tax returns rather than as a married couple. To file as a married couple they will need to submit a certified translation of their marriage translation certificate further notarized by the Foreign Ministry anyway.

    Well said. That is one depressing state of affairs.

    • Like 1
    • Thumbs Up 1
  9. Morning all,

    Imagine this scenario, i live in ะhailand retirement visa for years.

    I sell a house in London, previously used as an income stream from rental

    The resulting 40 mil Baht i want here in Thailand, in a lump or dribs and drabs it matters not.

    Does this become taxable? And at what rate?

    Is there any benefit in getting it here before January 1?

    • Thumbs Up 1
×
×
  • Create New...