Red Phoenix

Recycling the 2, 3 and 4 year old ad-hominem trash from your FactCheck archive? A desperate last resort in trying to counter the irrefutable evidence that the Covid-19 response was a disaster, and that specifically the Covid-19 gen therapies (the experimental jabs) were neither safe nor effective, and even more important > not necessary.

The main take-away for me and reason for posting this study is that it comes from a source that cannot be accused of 'anti-vax sentiments' but that it CONFIRMS that the vaccinated are now suffering more health-issues and higher mortality than the non-vaxxed.

The pre-print of this Norwegian study by a team led by prof Jaarle Aarstad from the Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, is about to be peer-reviewed. The title already says it all: The temporal protection and declining health of the COVID-19 vaccinated in England: A 26-month comparison of the mortality involving and not involving COVID-19 among vaccinated vs. unvaccinated But here the Study conclusions: An interpretation is that vaccination, despite temporary protection, increased mortality. Strengthening the interpretation was relatively high mortality among vaccinated not involving COVID-19 counterintuitively following periods of excess mortality. Further strengthening the interpretation was relatively high mortality not involving COVID-19 among vaccinated corresponding with the excess mortality during the same period. Source: https://f1000research.com/articles/14-133

Yes, that was their previous September 2024 stance. However, my post is about the official Health Canada regulator's statement last week in an e-mail to the Epoch Times confirming the presence of a Simian Virus 40 (SV40) DNA sequence in the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, which the manufacturer had not previously disclosed. This is an evolving story and it's tiring having to constantly remind you of actually reading what the article states and not responding by posting old rebuttals that do not keep up with developments re the issue. Note that the topic as covered in the posted Epoch Times article has been addressed in this longer but very worthwhile piece by dr Byram W. Brydle on his substack providing some background on the significance and implications of that SV40 sequence. > https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/p/explosive-story-health-canada-admits

Not for all those that experienced (or will experience) adverse effects after having first been coerced/manipulated into taking an experimental gen-therapy shot to 'protect their health', and then being gaslighted about these '100% safe and effective' shots.

Note that the topic as covered in the posted Epoch Times article has been addressed in this longer but very worthwhile piece by dr Byram W. Brydle on his substack providing some background on the significance and implications of that SV40 sequence. > https://viralimmunologist.substack.com/p/explosive-story-health-canada-admits In that article Brydle also addresses the potential juridicial consequences of Pfizer not having disclosed the presence of this SV40 DNA sequence to the HealthCanada regulator. An excerpt: > Notably, Pfizer has been granted legal indemnity for their shots; something which in and of itself should be a major concern. However, an important court ruling was recently made in Michigan, USA. Specifically, the court ruled that a pharmaceutical company’s legal indemnity was null and void for a contaminated version of the medical product. The product, but not any contaminants are subject to the legal indemnity. And failing to disclose a bioactive component would seem to go one step further. You can read an article about the legal issue here [ https://wwmt.com/news/local/michigan-judge-denies-drug-manufacturers-immunity-in-case-of-contaminated-covid-19-medication ] So, it would follow that Pfizer’s legal indemnity should be null and void for shots that contaminated with bacterial DNA that included a bioactive sequence that was not disclosed to regulatory agencies. = = =

We are 2025. Posting articles +3 years old to 'debunk' recent developments is not helpful to debate the issue, but we all know you are only posting this tsunami of scientific-sounding denial garbage, to derail the topic. Try to stick to the issue > Official regulator HealthCanada statement that confirms that Pfizer did not disclose the presence of this SV40 DNA sequence to them, which they are legally obliged to do. The juridicial consequences of this are quite interesting, as it could be considered fraud with Pfizer losing its indemnity for any claims of vaccine-harm.

> Scraping the barrel? A +1-year old article to 'debunk' the recent official HealthCanada statement

> Pathetic, a 1-year old newspaper article to 'debunk' the recent official HealthCanada statement

Health Canada has confirmed the presence of a Simian Virus 40 (SV40) DNA sequence in the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, which the manufacturer had not previously disclosed. > Now stop trolling, if all you can come up with are 2 year old Poltifact and 1 year old UsaToday articles, to 'debunk' what official HealthCanada is now stating.

Health Canada has confirmed the presence of a Simian Virus 40 (SV40) DNA sequence in the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, which the manufacturer had not previously disclosed. There is debate among scientists with regards to the significance of the finding, with some saying the DNA sequence has the potential to cause cancer, and others saying it poses little to no threat. “Health Canada expects sponsors to identify any biologically functional DNA sequences within a plasmid (such as an SV40 enhancer) at the time of submission,” the agency said in an email to The Epoch Times. “Although the full DNA sequence of the Pfizer plasmid was provided at the time of initial filing, the sponsor did not specifically identify the SV40 sequence.” The regulator said that after scientists Kevin McKernan and Dr. Phillip J. Buckhaults publicly raised the presence of SV40 enhancers in the vaccines earlier this year, “it was possible for Health Canada to confirm the presence of the enhancer based on the plasmid DNA sequence submitted by Pfizer against the published SV40 enhancer sequence.” Both scientists made waves after discovering plasmid DNA in the mRNA COVID-19 injections, warning it could potentially alter the human genome. However, the two share different degrees of concern about the significance of an SV40 sequence—which is used as an enhancer to drive gene transcription during the vaccine manufacturing process—being present in the shots. You can read full article here > https://www.theepochtimes.com/world/exclusive-health-canada-confirms-undisclosed-presence-of-dna-sequence-in-pfizer-shot-5513277

Possible but that is pure speculation from your part. Note that the USAspending.gov website does not mention any annotations being made, which you would expect for a site dedicated to tracking projects.

> And what about the DATE of that contract - september 2018 for Covid-19 services? Preparing to combat ridiculous posts from conspiracy theorists for an event that would only emerge + 1year later?

@Yagoda @Hamus Yaigh Well, I looked whether I could find that screenshot on the USAspending.gov website. And yes, here is the link > https://www.usaspending.gov/award/CONT_AWD_FA865018C7886_9700_-NONE-_-NONE- So it's not a hoax, and the contract between the DOD and Thomson Reuters Special Services is genuine. With that cleared up now, it sure raises some questions that the US Dept of Defense awarded a 4-year contract to Reuters already in 2018 for Covid-19 services, with the project described as "Active Social Engineering Defense - Large Scale Social Deception". > Both the date of award and the description of the services to be provided, beg for some clarification... Hope some AN-members can shine some light on this.

There wasn't a link to that website screenshot on the site where I came across it, hence I am not sure whether it is a hoax or genuine. Hope that some AN-member can shine some light on this.

Not sure what to think about this > Is it a hoax or incriminating evidence of the Covid-19 pandemic being planned by the DOD? From this USA Spending.gov website screenshot it looks that the US Dept of Defense awarded a 4-year contract to Reuters already in 2018 for Covid-19 services, with the project described as "Active Social Engineering Defense - Large Scale Social Deception". > The date and the contract description surely do raise some questions!

Best News of Today > not having to waste my time anymore responding to a foul-mouthing arrogant close-mind like you.

Hope so, but unfortunately that will most probably not be the case. But eventually McCullough will be reinstated, and those that were behind revoking his license will be unceremoniously dismissed and sued their pants off.

Try reading what I actually wrote. > Show me 1 post where I called you out for recommending people to take the covid-vaccine. Is it a false statement by me writing 'that you support the 'deadly covid-virus' narrative'? Don't think so, as you have repeatedly accused those like myself that state that it are not viruses that transmit diseases as crazy, anti-vax nutters.

Explains a lot about your vehement stance supporting the 'deadly covid-virus' narrative. Whose bread one eats, whose word one speaks...

So those +81.000 physicians, scientists, and concerned citizens, 240 elected officials and 17 professional organizations that are calling for the immediate removal of COVID-19 vaccines from the market to prevent further loss of life, are all 'anti-vax' quacks??? Pathetic nonsense!

Yes, you'll always find Andy in the kitchen at those...

Interesting... And you will undoubtedly also find this table interesting As you go down the list, nearly every senator who gave RFK Jr. a hard time during the hearing was a beneficiary of major pharma bucks. Bernie Sanders and Elisabeth Warren respectively for +23 and +10 million US $

Rather strange reasoning you apply here. How exactly do people that argue AGAINST vaccination, 'make a buck from other people, even as they know what they say is wrong'?

Over 81,000 physicians, scientists, and concerned citizens, 240 elected officials, 17 professional organizations, excess mortality, negative efficacy, and DNA contamination call for urgent action. Source: https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/review-of-calls-for-market-removal-of-covid-19-vaccines-intensify-risks-far-outweigh-theoretical-benefits/ = = = This peer-reviewed study by The McCullough Foundation, authored by epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, and Dr. Peter McCullough, titled, Review of Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines Intensify: Risks Far Outweigh Theoretical Benefits, was just published in the journal Science, Public Health Policy and the Law: Abstract COVID-19 vaccination campaigns around the globe have failed to meet fundamental standards of safety and efficacy, leading to mounting evidence of significant harm. More than 81,000 physicians, scientists, researchers, and concerned citizens, 240 elected government officials, 17 professional public health and physician organizations, 2 State Republican Parties, 17 Republican Party County Committees, and 6 scientific studies from across the world have called for the market withdrawal of COVID-19 vaccines. As of September 6, 2024, the CDC has documented 19,028 deaths in the United States reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) by healthcare professionals or pharmaceutical companies who believe the product is related to the death. The total number of COVID-19 vaccine deaths reported to VAERS (37,544 among all participating countries) have far exceeded the recall limits of past vaccine withdrawals by up to 375,340%. The criteria for an FDA Class I recall, which applies to products with a reasonable probability of causing serious adverse health consequences or death, have been far exceeded. Excess mortality, negative efficacy, widespread DNA contamination, and a lack of demonstrated reduction in transmission, hospitalization, or mortality have undermined the rationale for continued administration. These unified requests for regulatory action underscore substantial shortcomings in data safety monitoring and risk mitigation. Immediate removal of COVID-19 vaccines from the market is essential to prevent further loss of life and ensure next steps are taken for accountability of the harm incurred. = = = If you don't have the time to read the full study, and article highlighting and summarizing the main findings of this lengthy study, can be read here: > https://vigilantnews.com/post/peer-reviewed-study-finds-irrefutable-evidence-supporting-immediate-market-withdrawal-of-covid-19-vaccines/