Red Phoenix

Let me share the Conclusion and Patient Perspective of that pubished study by prof Goldman and his colleagues, as Goldman was NOT an anti-vaxxer (actually to the contrary). > https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.798095/full Conclusion This observation, which has been posted as a pre-print on the SSRN platform (18), suggests that vaccination with the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine might induce rapid progression of AITL. Dedicated studies are needed to determine whether this case can be extrapolated to populations of patients with AITL or other peripheral T cell lymphoma involving TFH cells. Patient Perspective The patient is the corresponding author of this case report. He hopes that this report will incentivize investigations to clarify the possible impact of anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination on the course of AITL. He remains convinced that mRNA vaccines represent very efficient products with a favorable benefit-risk ratio. > And here a link to an article about his demise from lymphoma-cancer: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2022/09/mrna-covid-vaccine-booster-lymphoma-cancer/671308/

Lol, the article by dr Sayed contains indeed a 40" excerpt from a 2022 video by dr John Campbell. And in that fragment Campbell cites the official response from Public Health Scotland about a question related to Covid-vaccine safety: "We do not have any plans to examine maternal vaccination status, as there is no public health reason to do so" > In the clip dr Campbell then pauses to 10 seconds to let the implications of that response sink in...

In my post I provided the link to the case-report that prof Goldman published about his own case (co-authored with 6 of his colleagues). Clicking within the page featured on that link [ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34901098/ ] you can read the full case-report here https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.798095/full Note that prof Goldman and his colleagues do not share your opinion that for this case "a rapid spread is not uncommon at all".

As I mentioned in the opening post of this thread dr Ah Kahn Syed is a pseudonym used by this Australian MD which allows him to speak his mind and provide his deep-dive insights on his ArkMedic substack. Are you not aware that many doctors in Australia had their license revoked when not parroting the official Public Health narrative about Covid and vaccination? And yes, I missed the sarcasm and misinterpreted your 2nd paragraph, but what would you expect from a crazy idiotic crackpot nutter like me?

The article by dr Sayed is not a research study but an essay published on his substack blog in which he shares his insights in the link between Covid and rapidly emerging cancers. Imo "Big Pharma and their pseudoscience cronies" is a very accurate description of all these Big Pharma funded 'independant research studies' and sponsored 'medical publications and websites'. You wrote that you believe you have a serious side effect from the vaccines. So it's somewhat puzzling that you discard this very worthwhile article about the harms of these gen-therapies (they are not vaccines) because the author is calling a spade a spade, and not trying to obfuscate it with flowery language. Especially since the article is a legitimate reaction against the efforts of Big Pharma and its actors, that try to hide or belittle the harmful effects of these shots with all means possible.

#1 - Yes, a pure disgrace that Kariko and Weismann were awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine for their work on development of mRNA gen therapy. There is of course a precedent > António Egas Moniz (1874-1955) won the 1949 Nobel Prize in medicine for developing the prefrontal lobotomy, a surgical procedure that severed brain tissue to treat psychiatric disorders #2 - Obviously the article by dr Sayed is not peer-reviewed, as it is not a 'scientific study' on a research-subject, but rather an essay explaining his insights in the link between the covid-jabs and the explosion in cancers. He published it on his own substack and all readers can provide comments. #3 - Dr John Campbell was initially a firm believer in 'the $cience' but the evidence became so overwhelming that we were conned by Big Pharma and their bought complicit mainstream media, that he 'fell from grace' despite him being as objective as possible and always providing the facts and data that he was commenting on.

I am not clueless in these matters and very much aware of that maxim by the great healer Paracelsus. Note that your argument that the EU prohibited substances in foods/beverages can be imbibed or ingested on a daily basis, while the vaccine jab is applied less frequently, is flawed. The whole point of the mRNA jab is to force your body into producing a toxic substance which will trigger a 'controlled' immune reaction so that you are 'prepared' when you catch an infection that has an identical or largely similar toxin. That's the theory in a nutshell. However, the 'geniuses' that created those mRNA jabs did not foresee an OFF-switch. They expected that the toxic-substance creation would fizzle out after a couple of days. Unfortunately it has been found out later that in studies done 180 days after the last mRNA-jab, that these toxic substances are STILL in your blood-stream. In other words, the jab turned your body into a perpetual toxix spike-protein factory, and that's why it is sometimes referred to as 'the gift that keeps on giving'. I found it noteworthy to select Prof Michel Goldman's case from the article in my post, as the spread of the cancer over a 3-week period is a good illustration of the 'turbo'-character of the cancer he suffered from. Your and his cases are indeed 'anecdotal', but I would recommend reading the full - lengthy - article from dr Sayed, as he addresses and provides data on many aspects re the connection mRNA jabs and cancer. Source: https://www.arkmedic.info/p/would-you-like-a-turbo-cancer-with

Whether the mRNA covid-vaccines trigger very fast developing cancers is a more than legitimate question and deserves serious debate. But it seems that even posing that question, let alone looking at the data, invokes an immediate dismissal of even considering that possibility by those that were coerced/manipulated in getting these jabs. But consider the following > In Europe currently over 100 individual substances are either fully prohibited or restricted in food and beverages due to carcinogenicity or potential carcinogenicity. However, injecting an experimental substance straight in your blood that will force your body to produce a toxic substance to prevent reduce the effects of a catching a mild respiratory illness, is deemed to be '100% safe and effective'. And note that these experimental jabs were NOT tested for carcinogenic effects, as that was deemed unnecessary for 'vaccines'.

This rather lengthy article by dr Ah Kahn Syed (a pseudonym) on his ArkMedic substack explores the issue from different angles. As he wrote > This article is hopefully going to answer the question about whether "Turbo Cancer” (a) exists and (b) is a consequence, or possible consequence of the imposition of a genetic vaccine platform on the global population. Source: https://www.arkmedic.info/p/would-you-like-a-turbo-cancer-with Here his conclusion: Are Turbo Cancers Real Then? ... What is certain is : that the regulators did not monitor the population for cancers after the rollout of a novel vaccine technology that multiple mechanisms are proven to exist that can cause new cancers or enhance existing cancers and that relate to these technologies that the regulators were unaware of the complexity of these mechanisms when they approved the vaccines that there is a huge network of propaganda underpinned by pharma whose job is to silence any discussion of this issue But I think the most effective image of the last 3 years to resolve this debate is that of Professor Michel Goldman, who published his own case report [ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34901098/ ] following his COVID mRNA vaccines. After his first set of vaccines he developed lymphoma. And not believing that “Turbo Cancer” could be a thing he dutifully got his booster. The rest, as they say, is history. = = =

CDC Purging Its Website After Trump Orders — Agency removed certain pages related to gender issues, HIV, and those that said "pregnant people" by Joyce Frieden, Washington Editor, MedPage Today January 31, 2025 Source: https://www.medpagetoday.com/publichealthpolicy/generalprofessionalissues/114039 = = = The CDC has begun removing from its website words and pages relating to diversity, gender identity, or LGBTQ issues, according to several sources. "From a journalist friend: Just spreading the word," wrote Deborah Blum, director of MIT's Knight Science Journalism program, on Blueskyopens in a new tab or window. "The CDC is purging data, so people should archive their favorite CDC datasets today, namely ones around race/ethnic diversity, LGBTQ, and reproductive health. Also, health data involving climate. The youth risk behavior surveyopens in a new tab or window has already gone down." It was unclear whether the pages were being permanently deleted or just removed from public view, but a quick search showed the following pages have all gone missing and return a note indicating the "page you're looking for was not found": Health Disparities Among LGBTQ Youth (archived page) Environmental Justice | Tracking Program (archived) Safer Food Choices for Pregnant People (archived) Interim Clinical Considerations for Use of Vaccine for Mpox Prevention (archived) Preventing HIV (archived) HIV Risk Behaviors (archived) Fast Facts: HIV and Transgender People (archived) Fast Facts: HIV in the US by Race and Ethnicity (archived) In addition, tools to estimateopens in a new tab or window and reduce the riskopens in a new tab or window of HIV were also down at the time of writing, as was a page on CDC's efforts to address racismopens in a new tab or window as a driver of health disparities. Full article here > https://www.medpagetoday.com/publichealthpolicy/generalprofessionalissues/114039

> I agree that an environment where everybody thinks the same is not a very fertile ground for innovation. But that doesn't mean that so-called 'positive discriminization' should be practiced when hiring/promoting individuals. Competence, merit and performance should always be the prime criteria in job-qualifications, and not 'ticking the right boxes' (race, gender, sexual inclination). The California wildfires were already somewhat of a Wake-Up call of how woke ideology can divert an organization from its primary mission, as the (lesbian female) LA Fire Dept chief made DEI the Dept's first priority.

The recent aviation disaster at Washington DC is raising questions whether lower Air Traffic Controller standards are putting the public at risk. Dr. Mike McCormick, former Vice President of the Air Traffic Organization, the operational division of the FAA, made a stunning statement about the quality of air traffic controllers and whether or not there has been a decline in competency. You can read the World Tribune article addressing the issue here > https://www.worldtribune.com/dei-injected-into-aviation-system-by-obama-was-stopped-by-trump-but-re-started-by-biden/ Revolver News noted: “The aggressive substitution of merit in favor of diversity has led to a so-called competency crisis, jeopardizing not only our ability to generate innovative technology but, in a more dire sense, our ability to simply maintain the proper functioning of various complex systems vital to our existence as a first-world civilization. Despite the superficiality of ‘diversity’ as a matter of rhetoric, the reality of diversity as an ideological, cultural, and legal imperative is not merely cosmetic—far from it.” = = =

@ the 'laughing emoji' poster > I agree that laughing has a positive effect on general health and quality of life, but not sure whether it can reverse the harmful effects of being jabbed.

OFFICIAL Czech record level data shows Moderna recipients had up to a 50% higher death rate than Pfizer recipients Source: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/breaking-official-czech-record-level = = = Executive summary This is an update to my recent article “Official Czech Republic record level data released Nov 2024 confirms Moderna has nearly 50% higher ACM than Pfizer” where I pointed out that the November 2024 official release of the Czech Republic data confirms Moderna causes significantly higher all-cause mortality (ACM) than Pfizer. I’ve updated the extraction software to look 2 years out, and in greater detail, and also added 95% confidence intervals and comorbidity index. The results are stunning: Moderna kills people more on a deaths per person basis than on a “% increase in mortality” basis. This is why those who are younger and have fewer comorbidities have a much higher % ACM increase. This isn’t age confounded. These are in 5 year age ranges where we measure this increase. The ACM differential between brands happens whether people die in high COVID months or low-COVID months so this isn’t differential efficacy. The effect doesn’t change if you pick people with the same comorbidity index (DCCI value). My spreadsheet allows you to examine this. This data confirms the findings of the Hungary study which found Moderna had an 18% higher all-cause mortality during non-COVID periods even though “Pfizer was preferred among older adults with chronic diseases” which is a direct quote from the paper. This was NOT caused by lower COVID efficacy for Moderna since the Hungary study showed Moderna had higher COVID protection than Pfizer. The results for all but the very youngest people (under 25) was large and statistically significant. For 65 year olds, the mortality increase (2 year Moderna relative to Pfizer) was 1.65 with a 95% CI of 1.5-1.8. This is a train wreck. = = =

Who else but our philanthropic 'friend' Bill Gates is behind this... = = = The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has funded skin implants (micro-needle patches) that deliver permanent quantum dots to verify vaccination status. The authors of the Gates-funded study note that the quantum dot 'markings' should persist for at least 5 years. The quantum dots can be detected with adapted smartphones for use in real world settings. Quantum dot implants would be used as biological vaccine passports, where their detection in human skin would be required to enter grocery stores, restaurants, gyms, and to travel... Here the link to the study > https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31852802/

A very worthwhile opinion piece written by former White House and Pentagon official Douglas MacKinnon and published on the website of The Hill. Source: https://thehill.com/opinion/healthcare/5105844-many-so-called-experts-will-owe-rfk-jr-an-apology-in-4-years/ = = = Earlier this month, NBC News posted a story titled, “Fluoride once again scrutinized for possible effect on children’s brains.” The second I finished scanning the headline, my very first thought in the form of a question to myself was: “By the end of the Trump administration, how many experts, Democrats, pundits, journalists and celebrities, are going to owe Robert F. Kennedy Jr. an apology?” In November, just days before President Donald Trump’s victory, Kennedy warned that “On January 20, the Trump White House will advise all U.S. water systems to remove fluoride from public water. Fluoride is an industrial waste associated with arthritis, bone fractures, bone cancer, IQ loss, neurodevelopmental disorders, and thyroid disease.” For years, Kennedy has been warning about fluoride in our water, and for years, countless “experts,” reporters, and politicians have called his warnings “controversial,” “junk science” and “crazy.” But…not anymore. Going back to the report from NBC, we have this: “The research, published in JAMA Pediatrics on Monday … found a statistically significant association between higher fluoride exposure and lower children’s IQ scores,” with scientists pointing to “a decrease of 1.63 IQ points in children” exposed. Wow. If Kennedy is correct about the danger of fluoride with regard to IQ loss — and he clearly is — what else is he correct about with regard to his other warnings pertaining to fluoride? Or for that matter, every other health issue he has been rightfully waving a red flag about for the last few decades? ... > Read full opinion piece here: https://thehill.com/opinion/healthcare/5105844-many-so-called-experts-will-owe-rfk-jr-an-apology-in-4-years/

> https://steemit.com/physics/@abhijitraorane/speed-of-light-is-not-constant-it-is-constant-by-definition

No matter how good they are in their chosen profession, would you take medical advice from a cab-driver, mail-man or your hair-dresser? Sure, you can listen to what they have to say and if they really know what they are talking about it would be wise to consider it. But it always baffles me that people value and sometimes even are persuaded by the often baseless opinions and one-liners made by Hollywood actors or rock-stars. Mark Crispin Miller in his latest sub-stack aptly titled "Bruce Springsteen, born to run (his mouth)" made that same point. Bruce Springsteen, Paul McCartney, John Fogerty, Neil Young, Joni Mitchell, David Crosby, Mick Jagger, Dave Grohl, Keith Richards, Willie Nelson, the list goes on... Here two quotes from the article: > How many great rockers, and other seeming-independent types, did not fall into line? For every one that used his or her head, multitudes revealed themselves as pods, as in Invasion of the Body Snatchers, their old selves vanishing into the phobic mass that put themselves under house arrest, faces diapered, then rushed to get the jab, and, all too often, closed their shows to the “unvaccinated.” > I could go on, sadly—indeed, far more in sorrow than in anger, since it’s probably too much to expect most people overall, much less most rockers and others in the entertainment business, not to fall for so relentless and immense a propaganda drive, if only temporarily. People don’t know what they don’t know; and that’s why effective propaganda always wins—by blacking out the truth, or counter-argument(s). You can read the full article here > https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/bruce-springsteen-born-to-run-his-mouth

It surely looks that after the bombshell speeches of both Trump and president Javier Milei of Argentina, that the globablist WEF attendants need some 'consolation'. > https://www.worldtribune.com/no-longer-secret-depravity-in-davos-as-escort-agency-reveals-record-year/

Do take a moment and reflect a moment on what you just wrote. #1 - You arbitrarily categorized the vaxxed as 'the more intelligent, socially conscious members of the human race' and those that did opt not to get vaccinated as 'the selfish ones'. How is resisting the relentless social pressure, coercion and manipulation to get the shots an 'act of selfishness'? And why are you deemed more intelligent and socially conscious when you 'go with the stream'? #2 - What you call a vaccine paradox is simply proof that the shots do NOT provide you with the protection that they claim, when the data indicate that the shots actually INCREASE your infection risk. Instead of the 'vaccine paradox' let's call a spade a spade, and call it the 'vaccine lie'.

Moments ago, ChatGPT assured me the COVID vaccines reduced COVID cases. So I uploaded the COVID cases data and asked ChatGPT to analyze it. It conceded that the shot increase your infection risk. Source: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/chatgpt-agrees-that-more-covid-vaccination = = = From ChatGPT: In plain English, the more you vax, the more COVID cases you get. This is precisely the opposite of what we were told by the health authorities. Here’s a link to the full ChatGPT session > https://www.skirsch.com/covid/chatgpt/CDC_cases_analysis.pdf = = =

UK's 4 Times Best Personal Trainer Makes a U-Turn on COVID Vaccines?? Mike Hind, the UK's 4X Best Personal Trainer and an MBE recipient, recently sparked a conversation on Facebook by sharing that he feels different after receiving the COVID vaccine. >> And here the link to that post on his Facebook-page https://www.facebook.com/MikeHindFitness/posts/pfbid02e7NkpFXswy3mp3aZ1BUQjNGtqJe9iXUoxpy2GqvUwccv34CruF5RbcMJ9Gn2mTF6l?rdid=eMOYrl2j9VCPi5B9# There are over 2,000 comments where everyone is sharing their experiences. It is quite a sight to behold! These are all real people whom Facebook censored prior to Zuckerberg removing the fake “fact checkers” a couple of weeks ago. = = =

Jan 24, 2025 Speaking today at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Argentina’s firebrand libertarian president, Javier Milei, delivered a thunderous speech that sent shockwaves through the global elite. With unwavering Honesty and Bold Passion Milei condemned 'wokeism,' hailed the rebirth of freedom in Argentina, and rallied world leaders to break free from the chains of collectivism. His impassioned words echoed across the hall, drawing both cheers and controversy. BizNews editor Alec Hogg - who is attending the World Economic Forum in Davos and was in the audience for the address - described Milei’s extraordinary speech as “a watershed.” Hogg said that in 19 visits to Davos, he has never attended a better speech. Hogg likened Milei’s words to Churchill’s famous “fight them on the beaches…” and MacMillan’s “Winds of change…” addresses. = = =