Jeff the Chef

So you lied, or tried to misdirect, understood.

I'll ask again, will you now admit you are wrong about 1979?

HI Wobblybob, would you care to debate when the war started in Gaza?

Will you now admit you are wrong about 1979? Israel’s disengagement from Gaza, unilateral withdrawal of all Israeli security forces and settlements from the Gaza Strip in August–September 2005. https://www.britannica.com/event/Israels-disengagement-from-Gaza

Close but no cigar: Israel's Disengagement from Gaza and North Samaria (2005) https://embassies.gov.il/MFA/AboutIsrael/Maps/Pages/Israels Disengagement Plan- 2005.aspx#:~:text=By 22 September 2005%2C Israel's,settlements in Samaria%2C was completed.

You were trying to downplay the "report within a month" to respond in 4 weeks as if it were not that important, the ICJ want a report not some form of response.

Wrong again, you're on a roll today, it's Israel that has to comply with the order not the people of Gaza.

The Good Ship Lollipop may have sailed long ago. but my full post included, comply with all U.N. resolutions, then look after their own people and leave the Arabs alone.

I'm sure the Israeli delegation will call you soon to give evidence to that effect the next time they go to the ICJ.

If there are around 1.5 million Palestinians around Rafah I hope they are big tents as 40,000 will need to house 37.5 persons in each one.

To keep you honest, that is all, not respond, report.

The timeline is irrelevant, my problem was with your wording i.e. "respond" as if it was just a matter of fact comment, whereas a report is " an account given of a particular matter, especially in the form of an official document, after thorough investigation or consideration by an appointed person or body."

No, not 4 weeks to respond, the actual wording is report: Decides that the State of Israel shall submit a report to the Court on all measures taken to give effect to this Order, within one month as from the date of this Order.

From the press release: As has been repeatedly affirmed, Israel is committed to international law, Israel is committed to meeting its legal obligations, including with respect to humanitarian assistance, Yet, the ICJ made the order yesterday, full text here: https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20240328-ord-01-00-en.pdf

Exactly what it says on the tin, Israel goes back to their given lands, look after their own people, comply with all U.N. resolutions, and leave the Arabs alone.

Really, so prove where I am lying and Israel is purer than the driven snow.

I'd like to see Israel go back inside their original borders, comply with all U.N. resolutions, then look after their own people and leave the Arabs alone.

I'm fine with that, can I suggest that you don't ask simple questions that only require one word answers, and then accuse the replier of lying.

OK, prove it.

Everything

State department official’s resignation highlights rifts over US Gaza policy #Annelle Sheline says ‘I no longer wanted to be affiliated with this administration,’ claiming Biden is flouting US law over Israel Biden administration’s Gaza strategy panned as ‘mess’ amid clashing goals https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/mar/27/state-department-resignation-gaza-biden-policy

A look into how and why international laws and principles are being applied and ignored in the Israel-Gaza conflict. The events of October 7th sent shockwaves across the world and brought to the forefront once again a conflict that has been ongoing for 75 years. The Israeli government’s response was prompt – they embarked on a war of magnitude in Gaza claiming they needed to take out Hamas and rescue the hostages. At first the international consensus of western powers seemed solid: Israel has the right to fight back after the Hamas attack. But more than five months later, Israel's military is facing criticism worldwide, including allegations that it is committing war crimes, crimes against humanity, ethnic cleansing and even genocide. This film will explore whether Israel is breaking international law; if so, why are western powers, in particular the US, silent.

Do you have a link to this statement?

It's politics, giving Bibi the finger, so to speak, keep up Bri, no deflection at all.

37 degrees on the Phitsanulok/Phichit border with a nice breeze, bring on the rain, save me watering the garden.