Cameroni

They are not piss poor shots, they fired in the direction of the barrel to spook him not to hit him, and he ran away as expected and could then be apprehended. Perfect tactics.

I'm not a prude, quite the opposite, but the same rules don't apply. If a woman tells me she's had 12 exes I would walk away immediately. Wouldn't you?

I doubt it very much. Trump of course has been in a long loving relationship and has 5 beautiful children. Swift has chosen to remain a childless woman. Quite tragic she will never experience the joy of children, but another reason not to take her 2 cent wisdom literally.

He looked pathetic dancing in the aisles though.

Well, she made some very bad choices in her personal life. Why should anyone trust someone like this on important matters?

See, this is the key the difference, the KEY difference placeholder. For Taylor Swift it is 80% about her looks. For John Lennon 5%. That's a huge difference. Now, since you mentioned her excellent lyrics, let's have a look shall we? "We are never, ever, ever getting back together We are never, ever, ever getting back together You go talk to your friends, talk to my friends, talk to me (talk to me) But we are never ever ever ever getting back together Ooh, yeah, ooh yeah, ooh yeah Oh oh oh I used to think that we were forever ever And I used to say, "Never say never..." Uggg... so he calls me up and he's like, "I still love you," And I'm like... "I just... I mean this is exhausting, you know, like We are never getting back together. Like, ever" No! We are never ever ever getting back together We are never ever ever getting back together" Okay, now, Placeholder, do you think Taylor Swift will ever pen something like this: "You may say I'm a dreamer But I'm not the only one I hope someday you'll join us And the world will be as one Imagine no possessions I wonder if you can No need for greed or hunger A brotherhood of man Imagine all the people Sharing all the world" Now, which of these lyrics are smarter? Which do you think? One is focused on her own navel, putting down men, the other is concerned about a brotherhood of man. I'm giving you a hint here!!!

Yes I agree, Swift made the most of her bubbly, free and easy, happy no matter what, vibe. And that did attract mostly 12 year old girls at first which made her a star. The same with Elvis Presley btw, way back when. She does make the most of her conversational style of singing and that eye brow raising punchline is her forte, but it's just hard to get past her promiscuity problem, I just don't like it and it put me right off.

Did you just compare the lyrics of John Lennon songs to Taylor Swift's lyrics? Please tell me you didn't do that?

No the experts are commenting on her rigidly upright position, which is part of her position overhaul, so clearly that's an ongoing problem. Since it's a spinal issue it'll be a life long problem and will only get worse with age.

Look, all women like to feel attractive, but for female pop singers who live not off their voice, but off their physical attractiveness, when the physical decline sets in and they are no longer popular, well imagine what a shock that must be when you were loved by everyone? It's enough to make anyone unhappy. Even if they have billions, the feeling of being unloved makes them unhappy and Mariah Carey is just the latest example of this.

According to one so-called 'Postural Alignment Specialist', who goes by Posture Mike on TikTok, Swift, who stands between 5'10 and 5'11, has a 'rounded upper back', which can cause the head to hang forward, resulting in a hump-like appearence. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13855533/Taylor-Swifts-Experts-bad-posture-transformation.html Rather than play politics she'd be better advised to do some yoga and focus on her posture. A hump -like appearance like a Gollum is a more serious problem for her than who wins the US presidential election, I'd hazard a guess.

Poor Taylor Swift is already experiencing the physical decline, apparently she is getting a "Golum" like hunchback and has to undergo posture overhaul. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13855533/Taylor-Swifts-Experts-bad-posture-transformation.html Poor girl, some problems even billions of dollars can't fix.

Yes, but just look at Mariah Carey and you'll quickly learn that billions don't make these women happy. Adulation and feeling attractive does. But nobody would now pay to buy an album of Mariah Carey. And Taylor Swift will go that way too.

She definitely has a better voice than Taylor Swift. Did Lady Gaga dress like a stripper and act like a total prostitute in her early music videos? Yes, she did, she pretended to be a sex-pot and sell records that way, much like Swift, but more extreme, only to turn around and claim to be serious artiste. . Ironically Lady Gaga actually had more talent than Swift. And surprisingly only half of Swift's boyfriends, well 6 we know about, so probably 18. Anyway, we look at Mariah Carey and feel so very sorry for Pop divas. It's so sad when the looks go and nobody wants to know anymore.

You know what' so funny? This high school dweeb living at home with his parents, who looked like a bag boy position would be his highest career option, he actually managed to get a shot off and hit Trump. Whereas this wannabe Ukraine warrior had 12 hours and still only managed to run away and never got a shot off. How embarassing is that for Routh? Lol.

You know, I kinda feel sorry for Taylor Swift, when her looks fade in a few years nobody will be interested in buying her records. She'll be consigned to the dustbin of pop like Lady Gaga, another pop diva who sold her sexuality at first than pretended to be an artist, albeit with a better voice than Taylor Swift. One only has to look at Mariah Carey today to see how sad that looks.

Which makes it even sweeter that polls show that voters are more likely NOT to vote for Harris due to her endorsement.

No, it's not just "right wingers". Scientists found this too: New research published in The Journal of Sex Research suggests that while people are willing to engage in a relationship with someone who has had two or three sexual partners, when their number is higher (or less) than that, an individual begins losing appeal. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/the-mating-game/201612/do-you-have-the-right-number-of-ex-partners

She has been very active. And whilst she admits to 12 exes, those are just the ones everyone knows about. The guys she really had fun with she has to keep them quiet. It has to be more than 12.

My great pleasure. Now, let's look at Swift's abilities in the singing department: "Reviews of Swift's early country albums criticized her vocals as weak and strained compared to those of other female country singers" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_Swift So her singing style is "conversational"...She can't even sing! She chats! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_Swift Like all female pop singers do in their early careers, Swift traded off her looks and sex appeal. If Taylor Swift looked like Rosie O'Donnel, how many records would she sell? Precisely zero.

I quite agree, taking care of sick people is far more honourable than shaking it off for 12 guys and stealing pocket money from 12 year olds.

No I would estimate you at 20 at most, probably below..

If you look at the TOTAL production of all German tanks during the ENTIRE war, you will see Germany produced about 67000 tanks and armoured vehicles. Russia produced, in the same period 119,000 tanks and armoured vehicles. This is the ENTIRE German tank production of the entire war. So whether they would have put the numbers they had in the West into Barbarossa, even that would not have enabled Germany to win looking at numbers alone.

It was far from the best result at the time, it was one of the worst results. Of course whilst Churchill approved the Morgenthau plan, which would have starved 32 million Germans to death, he also sanctioned the ethnic cleansing of 14 million Germans from the East, where huge numbers died, often tortured to death. You're trying to relativize Churchill actions by saying all were monsters, try doing that with Hitler and what he did, and see what response you'd get. But I broadly agree, it was a time of war and death was everywhere, and clearly this affects everyone's decisions. Nevertheless, Churchill has a lot of blood on his hands.

No, Lend Lease was an American program. The 5000 British tanks were aid the British sent and not part of Lend Lease. No it did not. Lend Lease gifted Russia 7000 tanks, but the Russians produced 119,000 armoured vehicles. If you think that's 30% you're obviously mistaken.