khunJam

Yes there is a shop that sells shark, none fit all xl and no Shoei in the shop. Looks like I’ll need to fly to bkk for a day. I’ve tried on at 30 helmets and none fit except for a TDC. It’s better than nothing for now

Yes fakes are over the internet and Micky Mouse quality in the shops. Fakes are easy to spot

In the north, shops are all out and have a shop in bkk scoped out

Looking to get a new lid and leaning towards a Shoei J-Cruise - medium or large and will have to order it online being that it’s not stocked in this region. I have an intermediate oval head 58.0 cm, wondering if anyone here has a Shoei with an intermediate oval noggin @58cm? Medium or large? Thanks

Well said Tippaporn, and what is so obvious starting at the beginning of this thread is the climate cult were posting news articles that was used to influence their beliefs and as the thread progressed and challenges were raised, then they chase with conflated data that shows no real evidence, only correlations and hypothesis claiming to be factual. It’s a craft of influence being succumbed by the believers that have no real understanding of what they are talking about.

Yes scientific evidence. I’m sure you believe that the Sun rises from the east and sets to the west every day.

You conflicted this document, because either you don’t understand the process or you’re only here to deliver rino poop. Here is what you fail to understand, the process of peer review. “This is my third publication in Nature to go along with another in Nature’s climate-focused journal Nature Climate Change. I have also served as an expert peer reviewer for both journals as well as Nature Communications and Nature Geoscience. Through this experience, as well as through various failures to get research published in these journals, I have learned that there is a formula for success which I enumerate below in a four-item checklist. Unfortunately, the formula is more about shaping your research in specific ways to support pre-approved narratives than it is about generating useful knowledge for society. In order for scientific research to be as useful as possible, it should prize curiosity, dispassionate objectivity, commitment to uncovering the truth, and practicality. However, scientific research is carried out by people, and people tend to subconsciously prioritize more immediate personal goals tied to meaning, status, and professional advancement. Aligning the personal incentives that researchers face with the production of the most valuable information for society is critical for the public to get what it deserves from the research that they largely fund, but the current reality falls far short of this ideal.” https://patricktbrown.org/?ssp=1&setlang=en-US&safesearch=off He clearly outlined the bias in the community and the challenges that many have to do to circumvent the belief system in the community that hinders progress. Either way you have no credibility. You seem to only scrounge for anything that conflates and or twists the facts. Which is a lie. You posted a link to a document that is a discussion of process then you conflate and customize in your post to justify your irrational position. This is what you do throughout the thread. Bottom line is that you are incapable of identifying any specific proof that climate change is human caused, but you are good at clinging on to the hypothesis and quoting conflating information with a lot of fluff and catchphrase. Your credibility is below zero and is no wonder why I noticed many have stopped responding to your predictable nonsense, either by being ignored or glossed over.

Yes it does have to with the subject, especially if someone isn’t familiar with it. Quinoa causes severe gas for some people. Just a warning, ok?

Any Led Zeppelin is all I need.

Anyhow, I appreciate the contrast you all have provided. I’m going to skip on over

Then please stop using any products developed by fossil energy immediately! Because it will stop the hurricane dead in its tracks.

This is exactly true and correct. You people just want an easy answer. There is none. Leaning how the ocean affects the climate is much more than currents and temperatures. The same with organic mass & solar system influences on and on. But none of you are interested in expanding your knowledge, you want an easy short summarized answer. Besides all that, as far as theoretical science is concerned it has yet to been assembled, even worse it’s impeded due to the political influence and infighting of scientists. This is where you all are jammed up at.

Everything you all keep asking for links and proof is already listed here. If you want to know go fetch it. Posting a summary here will only flood the thread. , it’s way too much.

Another garbage link. Go read the science that you oppose and and let me know once you have a comprehensive study under your belt. If you want to understand what you claim to be factual then you need to understand what you claim isn’t fact. You only post links that are based on an assumption of hypothetical reasoning. Show me a theory that has been tested.

An accurate model would need to be dependent on the entire phenomena, which would undergo an extensive undertaking. As of now the models are limited and by no means complete, and again the links were provided and you chose to bury them with garbage instead of reading. What keeps you from taking a look at this information and understanding it? I can only come to a conclusion is that even if you were able to analyze the and conceive that you are wrong, you would still deny it because as others have pointed out that it is a religious cult is why no one is taking any of you seriously

Your blip is off my radar, bye bye now

More importantly what is the politics that is motivating all this. This needs to looked at very closely, the who and what of it

Oh it matters very much. If you knew anything about science hypotheses isn’t to be proven. The theory is tested. And no theory has been presented to prove.

Isn’t this funny. Someone posted a link and you are not able to read it, too far above to reach

I have read many of your remarks, you are out of your league

Oh I’ve read everything. No evidence has been posted here at all that proves humans are responsible for any climate change. As others have pointed out and illustrated vary clearly is that there is a difference between an idea that correlates a hypothetical reasoning which you say is proof compared to a theory based on real world evidence of observation. All the claims and links that you anti oil people keep hammering at is simply a hypothesis as others already made clear. Also what is remarkably clear is none of have anything new. I have also taken the time to compare the data from computer models and observation, yes it is clearly biased. And again what many other people here have said and it is so clearly evident that you anti oil activists religious cult club members refuse to read the data. And it is also so very clear is that when a person posts good information you go on a internet scramble hunt to bury the truth. This is the playbook of the extremist left groups to push their anti human garbage. As another correctly put it, you are only hooping and whooping and hollering rabble rousing. No proof and proved nothing

Quinoa is good for passing gas

Well said. It’s a political theater and money is at the center of it. A money machine for lobbyists and their puppet politicians.

Absolutely! This is the proof that I would love to analyze. Proof it’s a bad thing and it could be changed. Most of the hype is we are all going to die if something isn’t done right now!! The biggest question is who is cashing in on this. Donations that enviro entities and the attorneys that work for them? Politicians that have big investments? Needs a closer look.

Damn right. Only people make climate change. Why on earth would anyone think otherwise is beyond me