SuperSaiyan

I agree to a certain extend that this is bothersome, on the other hand I would say, if you're rich you should pay what the tax law says. Or get a better accountant. You could easily get tax residency in some 0-10% tax country which has a DTA with Thailand and still pay nothing in Thailand regardless if 180 days stay or longer. Just look into Cyprus - that's what I am doing.

17 minutes ago, retarius said:

I just talked to an international tax consultant here in Thailand that deals exclusively with affairs of expats. He tells me not to worry and not to do anything. He said the law isn't changing, it has always been the law but it is being enforced now. he said that the government at present have no way of enforcing the law; that 'savings' except for the prior year, (which are really income and a frequent tax dodge), are exempt; he told me that my US SS payments are exempt under the tax treaty with the US. In short, don't panic, wait and see what the situation actually is before doing making any precipitous moves eg I was going to become a non resident for tax purposes for next year, ie spend less than 180 days here and give up my non-O visa (retirement). 

Your solipsistic view of the situation doesn't apply to people owning assets. Nobody will care about your "Social Security" or whatever people get paid in their home country. Try to imagine people having money in some Swiss Trust and just sending it over. Before: No taxes applied, after: They want taxes.

The earlier the better because all the girls get wet just looking at a handsome White fella in his early 20s. How do I know? I was 22 while I moved to Thailand for a couple of years the first time.

Don't let anybody stop you, especially not the gatekeeping boomers who love to have you stuck in the hamster wheel like they did for 40 years so you pay their pensions, "son, you have to work 40 years in some bullsh1t job then you can enjoy the fruits of your life when you are in your 60s". Yeah, why don't you shut the f up.

29 minutes ago, Walker88 said:

I assume you must be trolling, as no one can be so clueless.

 

trump was and always will be an abject failure, who only resonates with the low IQ demographic.

 

He is a convicted fraudster, a convicted sex offender, a convicted charity fraudster, under 91 felony counts for everything from trying to overthrow American democracy to stealing classified documents, and now also mouthing off because of his tiny micro-penis and its impact on his fragile ego. His country club is the target of surveillance by both adversaries and allies, and has members who are employees of China's MSS....and the reason is because he likes to show off by revealing national security secrets.

 

He claimed his 11,000 sf apartment was 33,000 sf, which constitutes bank and insurance fraud for which he will lose his NYC properties.

 

He is likely to face 5 years in a Georgia jail for his attempts to overturn his loss in 2020. He is likely to be convicted of RICO violations, and in GA that carries a mandatory 5 year sentence.

 

He is the first POTUS since Herbert Hoover to leave office with fewer Americans employed than when he took office. He has the worst economic record in terms of GDP change also going all the way back to Hoover.

 

He ran up $7,800,000,000,000 new National Debt in just 4 years, or $24,000 for every man, woman and child in the US. THAT caused the inflation that the Fed and Biden are now largely controlling.

 

He inherited 4.8% unemployment and left 6.8% unemployment.

 

He declared bankruptcy 6 times, foisting all of that bad debt onto the taxpayer (via bank and bondholder tax writeoffs)

 

He got hoodwinked by the fat little cretin in North Korea just because Kim knew how to pull trump's chain. That allowed Kim to ramp up U235 enrichment, improve the Hwasong ICBMs that can now reach all parts of the US, miniaturize nukes so that they fit on the Hwasong, and test nukes via supercomputer, just as the US does.

 

Everything trump has done is a failure. He can save nothing.

I assume you must be trolling, as no one can be so clueless, and no, I am not validating your rant by a lengthy response.

3 hours ago, jvs said:

Can you show something to back up your claim that he is the worst president ever?

Can you open your eyes? Or is this bait again?

Just now, scubascuba3 said:

I've seen people who liked being alone, who became noticeably happier when they got into regular social interaction, i appreciate some won't find it easy

They probably enjoy both? Happier as in smile? In social settings everybody is behaving differently than while being alone. It doesn't mean people can't be happy if they are alone just because they don't show the same expressions you observe while they are in company of others.

Not living totally alone, but except for gym buddies and the monthly dinners with some friends, I am 90% of the time alone and love it. I remember my childhood sitting in my room an playing 12h straight with Lego, alone. Some people are just made for it. Well and I was married for 10 years and being alone feels like being released from a long prison term.

1 minute ago, Baht Simpson said:

Seeing people who disagree with your views, not as rivals to be debated but enemies to be destroyed.

The issue is though, that this woke stuff has real life consequences. There are only 700 million Whites in the world of 8.5 billion, so we are a clear minority and mass immigration and climate change hoax to scourge us and future non-White leaders selected by an anti-White system is trying to change that even further.

To conclude, it's about survival at this point.

I don't know what's the biggest threat to humanity but I know the only one that can save us right now is Donald Trump, if he can overcome the Matrix trying to imprison him for 1000 years.

1 minute ago, fredwiggy said:

Yes, I knew this just like you did. Please educate yourself on what assuming means, and stop, because it makes you look ignorant.

There is no assumption, it's a fact that top US universities are so woke that they are simply anti White. Proven by facts. You can't disprove and get emotional, as always on the left.

Just now, fredwiggy said:

I'm not delusional about anything. Another one who assumes about people they know nothing about. All I did was post the definition. People get into Harvard because of their grades. Blacks apps are accepted more. One school isn't what the definition is about.

The definition is wrong, though. So, you don't know that Harvard and all other top US universities don't just admit based on grades. They have a "personal rating" system, which in fact means if you are non-White you win. Please educate yourself on the topic.

1 minute ago, fredwiggy said:

Definition actually differs from that......

the section of a political party or system that advocates for greater social and economic equality, and typically favors socially liberal ideas; the liberal or progressive group or section.

You're just delusional about your surroundings.

Harvard admissions:

https://nypost.com/2023/06/29/supreme-court-affirmative-action-case-showed-astonishing-racial-gaps/

Woke/Leftwing.