The Cyclist

Speculate no more. Just ask yourself why a human rights lawyer became The Director of Public Prosecutions. Head of the Criminal Prosecution Service. One would reasonably expect, both of those positions would go to someone who specialised and was very experienced in Prosecutions. He is a puppet, that has been been nurtured and placed in positions by those pulling the strings. Those were personal attacks, nothing to do with terrorism.

Criminal damage being charged under Terrorism offences = Auto D Notice. Lord Alli is obviously just a very nice and very benevolent chap 😀😀

Having been posting like a demented chimp, on various threads I only have 1 question Where is Chomper ?

As he cannot define what a woman is, there is not a snowballs chance in hell he can define what his Leadership is. It is an embarrassment to use his name and Leadership in the same sentence. He is nothing but a talking puppet.

London MP's can adopt them, house them, feed them, look after them, and be held responsible for their behaviour, up to, and including, jail time. Or they can shut their traps.

Do you think it might have anything to do with very strict immigration policies and very few illegals ? Which won't drive down salaries and keep GDP per Capita high.

As this week marks the 1 year anniversary of Labour coming to Power. It is only fair that we have a look at why Reform would be the largest Party if a GE was held today. I think these sum it up quite well Starmer, the epitome, of why Human Rights Parasites, should be banned from Politics.

Do I ? I went to a stag do in Pattaya about 18 years ago. I've never set foot in the place since. I am against unfettered immigration, as opposed to controlled immigration. I don't admire any Politician. I wouldn't urinate on any of them if they were on fire. You couldn't have got it more wrong Is this you ?

What a steaming pile of horse manure. People do not like Starmer, because he is a lying, miserable excuse for a human being, and him and his Party are an absolute train wreck.

I tried explaining this to another poster, using Einsteins definition of madness. Both Labour and Tories have presided over the shambles that the UK has become, over the last 30 or so years. Voting either in again, would meet Einsteins definition of madness. " Doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results, is madness " Amazing, that people cannot, or will not, see what is before their eyes. Certain sections of society, can of course, be excused. Their indoctrination and cult like traits are simple to spot.

This sums it up nicely

An indication of the desperation that is leaking out of Starmers pores https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/jun/28/keir-starmer-accuses-nigel-farage-of-taking-people-for-fools-in-wales Farage can say what he likes, He is from a Party that currently consists of about 5 MP's. If anyone is taking the Public for fools, it is you, you cretin, coupled with the rest of your Cabinet. You are a train wreck, clinging onto power. Perhaps you could explain why 2 male escorts, who caused criminal damage, have been refused bail, and their trial set for next year ? Nobody, but nobody, gets refused bail for criminal damage in the UK. What are you trying to hide and keep hushed up Starmer ?

Then you best not read this I understand that some, not all, of our readers have genuine impediments to understanding written English. So this guy has provided commentary and broken it down into easily understandable English Lying, deceitful, sad excuse for a human being. Only just beaten into 2nd place by a certain T Blair. However as Chomper points out, there is still 4 years where he could potentially surpass T Blair and be so far in front, that he would be in a league of his own. Or perhaps the howls of " When are you going to resign PM " will start ringing out from the likes of the BBC, Sky News etc, from Monday morning.

Correct. Just imagine how much of cluster Labour will be by then. By- Election wins for Reforms over the last few days, Labour dropping around 25% at each one, including Lyndsey Hoyles constituency. Reform have no need to implode They just need to sit back and watch Labour eating itself. Tories are gnawing on the bones of a not quite deceased carcass. Whatever way anyone tries to slice and dice it. For a Party that proclaimed loudly that they had a plan ready to from day . Somebody must have nicked that plan, they were lying like a big bag of lying things, or their plan consisted of driving the UK into the ground. U turn after U turn, meaning more tax rises in the Autumn Unemployment UP Welfare Bill UP Inflation UP Tax Rises UP Wealth creators fleeing the Country UP Different groups of people hating Labour UP Illegals almost 50% UP C'mon you 2. Give us the benefit of your mentalism by explaining how good the plan was, and how it is benefiting the Country ? People with inquiring minds, would like to at least try and understand the mentalism.

The 1st column after the dates are UK pedestrian fatalities Which are roughly about 100 a year less than Thailand. Does that make Thailands figures pretty good for a developing Nation Or does it make the UK's figures absolutely shocking for a so called developed Nation. Hope that clears up your confusion

The plebs are rebelling as well as members of the Labour Party At what point will both Labour and the Tories come to terms with being busted flushes and no longer represent the views or wishes of the majority of the electorate. Carry on. All you are doing is making the job of Farage easy. He does not have to do anything to become PM. You both, are doing it for him.

Labour are toast 11 months in, and they are in tatters. The difference between sitting in the big chairs, and rabble rousing from the cheap seats.

This one ? https://www.housingtoday.co.uk/green-light-for-460-home-mixed-use-marina-scheme-in-southampton/5134805.article You will find that this is endemic throughout the UK. Affordable housing included to gain planning permission. affordable housing dropped once project begins as being non viable. There have also been a number of high profile Court Cases, where the Council took the developer to Court for dropping the affordable housing. Hobsons choice for the Court. Rule in favour of the Council and the project does not go ahead. Invariably, the decision goes in favour of the developers.

You are beginning to stutter. You might want to take a deep breath and step away from your keyboard. And accept that someone with over 2 decades of experience - It might be fair to say that my big toe has forgotten more than you will ever learn from google.

Just a mentalist then.

Pretty good numbers for Thailand UK Figures 2016 448 6,507 16,595 23,550 12.63 2017 470 6,497 16,838 23,805 13.20 2018 456 6,662 15,314 22,432 13.50 2019 470 6,421 14,879 21,770 13.24 2020 346 4,318 10,086 14,750 14.24 2021 361 4,967 11,326 16,654 13.68 2022 385 5,889 13,053 19,327 14.52 2023 405

Right here Are you bi-polar ?

I never retired with a big fat, gold plated, index linked Government pension, because I worked in the DWP or similar. There is a world of difference between a legal challenge and a Judicial Review. A Judicial review will always side with the Government when it comes to matters of National Security. How is that for speculation ?

Are you struggling ? You intimated that I suggested setting up camps on the South Coast You invented an issue that did not exist. Just like you invent excuses as to why something cannot, or will not work. No, it's not a hypothetical, its a very simple solution, by invoking the National Security Act and drafting in the Military under Military Aid to the ( failing ) Civil Authorities. Because you are not familiar with what can be done, does not make it untrue.

Check it out for yourself then. You know, sometimes people actually know what they are talking about. Amazing eh