Georgealbert

Have you fead the thread? This was using examples to explain the situation in this accident, in Thailand. Maybe if you have nothing constructive to post, stick to quoting Enoch Powell in you other posts today.

As you seem unable to use google to search, here are the links. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/27/section/87 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2002/3113/contents/made Car magazine article also, just for reference. https://www.carkeys.co.uk/guides/laws-for-emergency-vehicles-explained Uk regulations as I am from the Uk, but same in most countries, that includes Thailand. Go to your local fire station and ask a trained driver. I have family in Thailand in fire and rescue services and I asked them, not just shouting my mouth off in a forum, with no knowledge, experience or training, like you. I also read that Dunning and Kruger were looking classic examples for their research, you seem to be will suited for that. Bye, as I have better things to d than try to educate TROLLS.

Go back to your bar stool, you may find someone who is impressed with your BS. Leave facts to those that have the knowledge, training, skills, qualifications and experience

I passed the UK EFAD course over 35 years and did regular refreshers up to a few years ago. Have driven fire trucks, water tankers, cars, landrovers, turntable ladders and hydraulic platforms, on blue lights hundreds if not thousands of times. Your experience and qualifications? Zero I bet. I will quote the Uk reference for you again. Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 Section 87 The Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2002 Keep left: Section 3(15)(2) Double white lines: Section 4(26)(5b) Zig-zag lines: Section 4(27)(3c) Red traffic light: Section 5(36b) Exemptions from Road Signs Police, fire and ambulance can exceed the speed limit if it would hinder progress. This includes ambulance rapid response units operated under the NHS. Police, fire, ambulance, bomb disposal and blood service can drive through a red traffic light and disregard a keep left sign if it would hinder progress and can be done so without endangering anyone. A rule of thumb is that a red traffic light should be considered as a give way sign. Police, fire and ambulance can stop on zig-zag lines at the side of the road but no exemption is given for crossing double white lines down the middle of the road. Sometimes emergency vehicles may need to disobey other signs and regulations. This will depend on the professional judgment of the driver and they could be liable for prosecution if the act was not proportionate to the circumstances. Road signs can be disregarded by anyone if directed to do so by a police constable in uniform. This gives police drivers the opportunity to give themselves permission to disregard a road sign

Certainly wins “most silly post of the day” Think you need to find a hobby or something.

Seems you want to start a thread, “who has the longest overstay.” You seem to be proud of you 10 day fine. Think you need to be more worried about buying gf house or getting her to Spain.

Can you recommend a “prosecuting attorney” in Thailand I can ask? i remember you had previous experience after getting pushed by a Juristic Entity Chairperson.

Exemptions from Road Signs Police, fire and ambulance can exceed the speed limit if it would hinder progress. This includes ambulance rapid response units operated under the NHS. Police, fire, ambulance, bomb disposal and blood service can drive through a red traffic light and disregard a keep left sign if it would hinder progress and can be done so without endangering anyone. A rule of thumb is that a red traffic light should be considered as a give way sign. Police, fire and ambulance can stop on zig-zag lines at the side of the road but no exemption is given for crossing double white lines down the middle of the road. Sometimes emergency vehicles may need to disobey other signs and regulations. This will depend on the professional judgment of the driver and they could be liable for prosecution if the act was not proportionate to the circumstances. Road signs can be disregarded by anyone if directed to do so by a police constable in uniform. This gives police drivers the opportunity to give themselves permission to disregard a road sign. References Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 Section 87 The Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2002 Keep left: Section 3(15)(2) Double white lines: Section 4(26)(5b) Zig-zag lines: Section 4(27)(3c) Red traffic light: Section 5(36b)

Total nonsense, flashing lights and sirens warn other road user, and allow emergency vehicles to treat a red light as a give way, and can only proceed when safe to do so.

Total nonsense, flashing lights and sirens warn other road user, and allow emergency vehicles to treat a red light as a give way, and can only proceed when safe to do so.

5555 your on every Trump threat, but you don’t like him, just hate Biden! Used the new stock photo option and searched your user name. Surely something went wrong.

Yet another Trumper in denial. Everyday you post your support for Trump and his propaganda. Now you called him an ahole. So predictable.55555

A rabbit hole is not deep enough for this poster(the kiwi beachlover). He is just a vast echo chamber as he puts everyone on ignore, when you call him out on facts.

No, there are rules, if you choose not to follow them, then tough luck. He probably had a superiority complex, and thought he was special, or has listened to some of the poor advice given on these forums.

Think we have enough trolls pretending to be human already, Where BobS to today?

So you now support violence and intimidation to support Trump. What kind of alternative, empty echo chamber, reality, do you live in? Do you make a conscious effort every day to make yourself look silly in your posts or does it come naturally?

Seems not to be you lucky week with money transfers. Today moneygram, yesterday Western Union.

What else do you expect. Mr F off is on another rant about The Guardian. He seems to think it should not report facts. I think the true reasons is he tries to hid his real views, as he seems to wants to jump straight in on every thread about immigrants/ non whites.

What will be the plan tomorrow??? If you are real, please sit down and think to yourself, what do you want? Sorry, but you seem to be disaster waiting to happen. Please never invest any more that you can afford to lose.

55555 Where was I banned? All I have asked you for is the links to real facts. Youtube posts, like in your other thread is not facts. So lets stick with the originally thread, which was quoting facts about what was said at the hearing, it was not opinion piece from the The Guardian, it was a statement of the details of the hearings. It was you that went off on a rant. If you cannot remember see below. Talking of abuse it was you calling people “snowflakes”, then start whining when people call you out on your false facts.

How is stating facts an insult? Happy to be on your long ignore list.

Yesterday you were worried about the length of her name, and were planning to move to Spain. Less than 24 hours later you want to buy her house and 30 + 30 lease. What could ever go wrong!!!

Keep digging, all your doing is backing up what I said. The Guardians reported facts from the hearing and you do not like facts. You seem to thinks you and only you are ever right. Your rigid and narrow minded perspective of the world really prevents you from seeing the facts. So what happens when again you don’t like the facts, you go off on another rant.

So you would like your news sources not to report the facts and quotes from the hearings, which the Guardian has done here. You seem, again, to only want to read news that meets your agenda, and bias views. You really do find facts difficult!

Good post, but you trying to show facts to a Trump fan, they will not believe it. They can only repeat “facts”(propaganda) from Trump, the man that has never lied. 555555